There's nothing too complicated about what they do but it's a grind, often accompanied by bad weather. If the company and union have agreed to what's paid then I guess that's reasonable. Might have too much turnover with less pay. But I can remember when FedEx was a much more complicated job and we never got this pay. Express is a lot more streamlined now.
California is a sorry excuse for a state
- Thread starter Peytonmanning11
- Start date
Peytonmanning11
Well-Known Member
To be in the army reverse do you need to take the asvab
Capitalist businesses are more likely to go bankrupt because of many factors including there are a heck of a lot more of them.
UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
Yes but the minimum score needed to pass is only 31 compared to 50 for the regular forces.
im not sure why but maybe cuz the workers dont give a
and just care about doing the least work possible and keeping their job??? thats me and many guys at my job. guys sleep on the job. were not rewarded for working harder.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
It's mandatory, and it's something that has to be taken into consideration when it comes to compensation. Not a lot of people want to work these hours.
More like $75k here, depends on area, since some have pay raises diverted to underfunded pensions.
For my area, I would say yes. I think some regional and local unions should probably consider adding cost of living adjustments to their supplements.
Our pay has more or less, simply kept up with inflation over the last 30+ years. I think that should continue.
I think it's unfortunate that other jobs haven't. I also think it's unfortunate that people in those other jobs resent people who are fairly compensated and want to bring others down with them.
floridays
Well-Known Member
I'll assume you're trying to communicate to Americans (for the most part), it's labor here.
floridays
Well-Known Member
And I don't care about your forewarned "elaboration", KAPISH?
Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
Co-operatives have the potential to reward the owner/employees, but they also pass the risks along as well. If that's what floats your boat, all you need is a game plan and a group of like-minded investors/employees to start your road to incredible wealth. Or, you could sell Amway! Either way, noone's stopping you.
government could incentivize them the way they do in italy.
capitalist workers take on risk too like working conditions, losing their jobs, etc.
dezguy
Well-Known Member
According the the English who, you know, created the English language, it's labour.
floridays
Well-Known Member
Correct, but in America we spell it labor. Sorry to be short, I need to run to the towne centre and purchase a new improved personality.
dezguy
Well-Known Member
But he's posting from Canada, where labour is the accepted spelling.
floridays
Well-Known Member
Understood.
my fingers are on automatic pilot
It will be fine
Well-Known Member
There shouldn't be a need to incentivize them if they are more successful. According to you they should have a competitive advantage and would thus be far more prevalent.
well they are and im not sure why they are not more prevalent. perhaps everyone thinking theres only 2 economic systems has something to do with it.
It will be fine
Well-Known Member
If I had to guess it's because the people with the skills required to start one would rather start a traditional company and keeps the fruits of their labour themselves.
you mean exploit their workers.
