caravan
- Thread starter Jkloc420
- Start date
Rumpel Stiltkin
Active Member
hey which movie is that avatar son
Obama would have been crucified by conservatives had he sent thousands of troops to sit on their asses for three weeks and wait for a few thousand mostly desperate and unarmed people to show up at the border fence as an act of political theater.
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
OK.
(If you're not concerned at all that any random President is instructing the US Military to work within the US borders without Congressional approval, you do you).
Sleep tight.
The President has the right to send troops into what he considers an emergency without getting Congressional approval first.
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
I bet you love RED DAWN.
Are we being invaded?
All snarkiness aside, think about it.
You’re endorsing a President who wants to put the military on US soil, this time...
You’re OK with it, this time.
In fact, you’re ENTHUSIASTIC about it, because it’s what you want.
What about next time?
You like the 2nd Amendment, right?
What if a President decided to make an executive order about an amendment...oops
Never mind, READ THE CONSTITUTION.
Case by case basis. No president is going to try to take out the 2nd or any other amendment. Trump's actions per the 14th amendment is just interpreting it because there's some leeway for interpretation. If he's wrong the court will correct it. The 2nd amendment is pretty much set in stone.
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
Give me a break, if you don't like the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, I could drive a truck through the current ideation of the 2nd Amendment, if you want to talk about 'interpretation'.
By the way, the SC has validated the 2nd Amendment, several times.
By the way, the SC has validated the 14th Amendment, several times +.
Would you like to talk about nuances of interpretations?
Guy, come on.
Both Amendments are settled law, backed up by multiple SC decisions.
You refuse quibbling on the 2nd, but you quibble on the 14th?
Please.
The intent of the writers of the 14th amendment was to insure the citizenship of freed slaves, not to give citizenship to the babies of foreigners born here. They clearly stated that in debates in Congress. If anything giving citizenship to babies of illegal aliens is incorrect.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
So?
Turdferguson
Just a turd
Justand giggles.
Obama sent the National Guard and you were having an orgasm it felt so good.
TDS - Get a grip
!
!
I thought the governors controlled the national guard ,
Non sequitur
Well-Known Member
"Desperate and unarmed", that's it, and how many are there in the world?
I listened to a podcast explaining the net positive of "trickle down" immigration. The fact that after the initial costs it actually grows the economy. While this might be true it's not the point. If your First Act of becoming a citizen is an illegal act what kind of message are you sending to the host country. Secondly why are not the countries of origin being held to the same kind of scrutiny as the United States in regards to the misery of their Countryman.
Future
Victory Ride
The president can mobilize at any time
And I'm sure they are all immunized and aren't carrying any diseases.....Seriously who thewants these people in our country like this?
Future
Victory Ride
Smh ... this is the most stupid thing I have ever seen...... not really but close.... personally if they put one foot in this country ...my finger on a trigger would never come off
I would also consider that an invasion.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
So you're for gunning down unarmed women and children. Nice........
Future
Victory Ride
No ... I would take them by the hand ...gun on shoulder and take them 2 the proper place 2 enter the country
Future
Victory Ride
You can’t just storm our borders ...there is a process ...I stand firm on that
