you know adjust to changing conditions...think out of the box and all that.
take a good look at some of the other unions and see what they do.....the i.a.m. is a great place to look at.......
Those opportunities vanished when UPS paid it's withdraw liability from the Central States pension fund and moved into a single employer pension.any hours over a set amount and the company pays over-time but does not pay into health and pensions.....perhaps the teamsters and company can brainstorm together and adjust ..you know adjust to changing conditions...think out of the box and all that........I am sure that you folks have other solutions ........take a good look at some of the other unions and see what they do.....the i.a.m. is a great place to look at.......
22.4 union dues. Hourly wage discount progression. Those concessions would help the central plan. Wasn’t sure of PT contributions because we know they don’t stay pension. They are a undeniable constant churn of revenue.I always welcome different points of view.
Unfortunately, that's an "apples to oranges" comparison.
There will be no brainstorming by UPS, aside from finding a way out the guarantee to retirees that left since 2008.
Oh and btw, the IAM recently cut pension benefits and raised the minimum retirement age, a notion deemed unacceptable by the membership and the government a few years back.
Union dues has nothing to do at all with the pension.22.4 union dues. Hourly wage discount progression. Those concessions would help the central plan. Wasn’t sure of PT contributions because we know they don’t stay pension. They are a undeniable constant churn of revenue.
22.4 union dues. Hourly wage discount progression. Wasn’t sure of PT contributions because we know they don’t stay pension. They are a undeniable constant churn of revenue.
Those concessions would help the central plan.
And as far as putting part of your pay raises into the pension fund ask upstate New York how that worked out for them?
I wasn't talking about him trust me, I was talking about his pension fund.He couldn't afford a cat any longer ?
I wasn't talking about him trust me, I was talking about his pension fund.
Those guys up there was making a couple dollars an hour less than everyone else and they still got their pension cut
Those opportunities vanished when UPS paid it's withdraw liability from the Central States pension fund and moved into a single employer pension.
There will be no brainstorming by UPS, aside from finding a way out the guarantee to retirees that left since 2008.
Oh and btw, the IAM recently cut pension benefits and raised the minimum retirement age, a notion deemed unacceptable by the membership and the government a few years back.
Corporate would of found a loophole already if they get out of that 2007 withdraw agreement..done deal and one of the reasons they gutted their management pension plan, frees up roughly 5 billion in contributions annually.
The UPS plan for mostly part timers will be on the table come 2023. I can see the company offered a matched 401k. The western’s peer 80 will still have part timers contributing monetary, very healthy returns currently.
The IAM pension plan were paying out similar to the Peer 80 plan, but had to reduce their future retiree benefits. Simply not enough newer participants to cover the benefits promised for the older ones.
I believe that the weekly contributions per full time members is bordering over 2,000 a month, if the stock market and investment annuities continue to grow it should provide a healthy pension benefit for our members..Good news for most of use...
Expect UPS to use it as a negotiation tool in every future contract.
Nope- not crying. But why would the trustees need to go to Disney World to hold a meeting regarding a New York State fund? I'm sure you will have one of your witty responses....since you know EVERYTHING.I just couldn't resist taking the shot.
If he had not been such an arrogant, condescending, management wanna-be....
There were numerous times I pointed out that there was no way, that fund could pay out what it promised.
$5500.00 a month for 30 years of service ? No way.
Thats why @What'dyabringmetoday??? cries on this forum so much.
It's the Unions fault.... "they are fat and eat at buffets".
But yet, they couldn't even muster a 50% member participation in their pension vote.
Who is the real problem ?
-Bug-
And you are 100% correct about the participation. But you will never admit that the "elected leaders" are partly to blame. Perhaps you are a stand-up representative. But many times it's not the case. But in our local- the "leaders" don't want participation and actually try to do what they can to inhibit it.I just couldn't resist taking the shot.
If he had not been such an arrogant, condescending, management wanna-be....
There were numerous times I pointed out that there was no way, that fund could pay out what it promised.
$5500.00 a month for 30 years of service ? No way.
Thats why @What'dyabringmetoday??? cries on this forum so much.
It's the Unions fault.... "they are fat and eat at buffets".
But yet, they couldn't even muster a 50% member participation in their pension vote.
Who is the real problem ?
-Bug-
How would you feel if your preloader had a higher hourly rate than drivers because the FT wages were diverted to prop up the pension?I wasn't talking about him trust me, I was talking about his pension fund.
Those guys up there was making a couple dollars an hour less than everyone else and they still got their pension cut
Our part-time pension is separate hereHow would you feel if your preloader had a higher hourly rate than drivers because the FT wages were diverted to prop up the pension?
What's better is that we support the plan for everyone outside of UPS whose companies went out of business. But if they had monies paid in ,where did that money go? Gee-I wonder....How would you feel if your preloader had a higher hourly rate than drivers because the FT wages were diverted to prop up the pension?
Our part-time pension is separate here
None of the part-time money goes into the full-time pension plan