Wally
BrownCafe Innovator & King of Puns
Has zero to do with the company. Their contributions are the same.And it's a windfall for the company
Has zero to do with the company. Their contributions are the same.And it's a windfall for the company
Their contributions are based on 40 hours so any overtime money you lost is back into a company pocketHas zero to do with the company. Their contributions are the same.
I know you're not talking about mine.His pension fund is nothing worth talking about
I believe yours is slightly underfunded. And you retired with a very large health care bill and no guarantees on your pensionI know you're not talking about mine.
Ours is not underfunded, it's in good shape. You're thinking of someone else.I believe yours is slightly underfunded. And you retired with a very large health care bill and no guarantees on your pension
Nope, it goes it the pension fund.Their contributions are based on 40 hours so any overtime money you lost is back into a company pocket
You better check againNope, it goes it the pension fund.
All we did was add to the original amount going in. Our contribution doesn't enrich the company in any way.You better check again
It only goes by 40 hoursAll we did was add to the original amount going in. Our contribution doesn't enrich the company in any way.
All of those OT hours don't count.It only goes by 40 hours
Correct in a company is pocketing the overtime moneyAll of those OT hours don't count.
Right. So I guess we add even more for those overtime hours.It only goes by 40 hours
I'm telling you the pension is based on 40 hours over time does not go into the calculationRight. So I guess we add even more for those overtime hours.
Those employers took advantage of tax and bankruptcy laws to escape their obligation. But many are still in business with re-iterations of ownership and name changes. Some even kept their name after stiffing their pension obligation...eg Hostess.I guess I would rather see the employers that the Teamsters in CS actually worked for have to clean up the pension obligations to the members rather than you and I have to pay for it with higher and higher taxes.
Wrong. The CSPF was constrained by law to not reduce retiree benefits which would've helped their funding shortfalls. The head administrator Tom Nyhan of CSPF introduced a plan to keep the CSPF solvent in 2010. No action was taken by the Republican controlled Congress. When the opportunity to reduce benefits arose in late 2014, the new more drastic CSPF plan was rejected by the Treasury dept as "insufficient" to avoid their eventual collapse. UPS lobbied heavily against that plan.The Central had decades to make changes, did nothing.
You got a 25% extra pension payout in 2020.
Are you sure? Mine is the first 2080 hours worked. Straight time and overtime. Rarely get contributions in November, and never in December.Correct in a company is pocketing the overtime money
They only contribute 2080 total so if you work more than that you're not going to pay an extra nickel inAre you sure? Mine is the first 2080 hours worked. Straight time and overtime.
I'm telling you the pension is based on 40 hours over time does not go into the calculation
You said based on 40 hours, not 2080. There is a big difference.They only contribute 2080 total so if you work more than that you're not going to pay an extra nickel in