Lineandinitial
Legio patria nostra
Every year we seem to have more to do and we get less for doing it.
So are you guys bummed or not? It seems like you're losing more every year.
Just asking.
the company is grateful for you support. I personally think you're much too bright to miss the point that future promotions will miss out on the half month bonus.
Hi joe welcome to management. Your starting salary is x amount of dollars. As recognition for the extra time and effort you will put in at peak we built in an extra 3 percent into your check.
How long do you honestly think future managers will try to sell that song and dance?
I dont necessarily agree with the woe is me management is getting screwed opinion of the poster you responded to but I did think his point was relevant to this thread.
I decided to call a friend in corporate compensation today. She said that the salary ranges and mid points would move up 4.2% to compensate for the 1/2 month check change.
So, new supervisor used to come in at 90% of midpoint. Assuming he/she still comes in at 90% of midpoint the yearly pay is the same.
Your argument of taking advantage of new supervisors could exist in all cases. All corporate would have needed to do is lower the midpoint or bring people in at a less percent of the mid than before.
When new people are told of their pay, it includes MIP and 1/2 month. If the intent was to hide the change, it would have been very obvious when the total package was presented.
I'm not ready to take it to the "taking advantage of new supervisors" level. I think the plan is to eliminate it and this is the quick and quiet way to do so. they will never miss what they never had.
I'm not ready to take it to the "taking advantage of new supervisors" level. I think the plan is to eliminate it and this is the quick and quiet way to do so.
I guess all I'm saying is that there are other easy ways to eliminate the 1/2 month compensation (if they wanted to).
They could have left the 1/2 month in, and reduced raises by 1.5% for 3 years.
Personally, I liked the 1/2 month because I was nice for christmas presents. I think people will not save the money all year long.
So, while I'm not a fan of the change, I do not see it as a sign of more future elimination.
"When new people are told of their pay, it includes MIP and 1/2 month. If the intent was to hide the change, it would have been very obvious when the total package was presented."
When I came on I specifically recall language regarding the 1/2 Month as being "In addition to". Back in those days it was a handshake as UPS was the Employer that "took care of its Employees"; and they did. I was a guy really wanting to be Brown!!
I was very happy with the Company in the 1980's and 1990"s.
I miss my Turkey and I will definitely miss my 1/2 month. It made Peak special and understandable to my Family. I guess I need a Christmas Club now to show them how my Employer values my commitment and the extra load on m y Family during the Holidays.
I'm going to KXXX this Peak and I won't be home until Christmas Eve. Missing Returning Children/ Family Gatherings / Friends' Gatherings/ etc................No one seems to understand the Human Side of this.
Heather...nice Post
Considering the hours you folks put in during peak I can see why the 1/2 half month bonus will be missed. Even though it comes out in the wash, it's not the same as getting the extra cash at Christmas when you need it. My wife has a Christmas club account at work. $50 a week. $2600 for the Holidays is beautiful!
What is the benefit to the company in changing the compensation structure?
If the management people aren't loosing anything, how can the company gain anything? If it's a wash, why change it?
It seems to me that holding on to an extra $100 million or so would be beneficial to the company. Why pay it out early? The interest on a $100 million has to outweigh the expense of processing the checks.
If it makes sense to pay out the bonus early in equal increments, why not pay out MIP early? There has to be something more to the plan.
I have talked to many people in corporate and cannot see any huge beneift to the company or unterior motive. Let's look at it....
1/2 month: There must be some simplified processing, by not having to complete 30,000 extra checks at the beginning of the year.
MIP: There is certainly a time value of money savings to the company. They will defer a payment for 3 months. The deferred payment applies only to the cash portion I think. (remember, they will also give you one month's pay, so I'm not sure how much the time value of money savings is) MIP is already accrued monthly in the books.
LTIP / LTI: They eliminated extra correspondence, materials, etc.
Ownership guidelines: I'm unclear about this one.... Seems that they have seperated the ownership guidelines and how the 1/2 month is calcualted, nothing more... They "may" put some teeth in the guidelines now. I think that would be good.
I do not know if you have the complete material, presentation, and FAQ's. I do and have read them multiple times.
They say that there are some simplified processes as mentioned above. They also say it aligns MIP to the fiscal year. Finally they say that there is not a cost savings for the company.
The examples as well as my own calculations do not show any loss to the employee. (They show a small increase).
Will a "gotcha" come? I don't know. I just don't see it now.
BTW, I liked the old program. I liked getting the extra 1/2 month check. I liked all the incentives seperated. I'm just saying I don't see problem with this one.
Pretzel..
1. As far as processing the 1/2 month payroll. I (a long time ago), was in payroll and did the 1/2 month paycheck for mgmt. This process took all of 4 hours. Having a consolidated site, will make that even faster. The one thing I see that will save is all those checks not having to be mailed out. But that's pretty minor.
2. MIP already being accrued. YOu are dead right, and this is really where the company is making their savings. All they need to do for the fiscal year 2011, is accrue for a small MIP payout (what did they say the max was, 1 month? So that is the huge savings for the fiscal year for UPS. In 2012, they will accrue that cost throughout the year, and the amount total that they pay in 2012, will be less by the payout in Dec 2011. A win win for UPS.
3. Ownership guidelines. If upper mgmt where doing a better job and getting the company to grow more, we wouldn't need incentives to keep the stock. When it was growing at 10-20% per year, people were borrowing to own more, borrow at 5% and earn 20% was a great deal. Lots of older mgmt made a lot doing that. But, now the stock hasn't really grown for years now (esp like it used to). The BOD and mgmt committee are responsible for long term share price growth. They've been doing a pretty bad job on that.
There were some rumors going round the building today that there would be some changes in management pay and maybe MIP.
I don't think anyone had any details. Anybody heard any details?