well there must be bc cornel west said it.
climate catastrophe
- Thread starter rickyb
- Start date
he likely had same views on the environment from 1992 to 2000. didnt do a damnnn thing
Non liberal
Well-Known Member
Cornel west has the intelligence of a child.
Non liberal
Well-Known Member
I see why you like him
hes up there with jedi master chomsky
He wasn't in office in 1992 and as vice president it wasn't his call.
he was vice president for 8 years and he did nothing
again liberals fight for nothing. which is why none of hte ppl i listen to are liberals
You obviously don't understand that as vice-president his duties are mostly ceremonial.
lord dick cheney was vice prez but he was probably the evil emperor. w bush was too stupid.
newolddude
Well-Known Member
St. Louis and Kentucky flooding: 2 different 1-in-1,000-year flood events in same week
A historic flooding event unfolding in eastern Kentucky Thursday is coming just 48 hours after another historic rainfall event buried parts of the St. Louis area under feet of water, both considered 1-in-1,000-year flooding events.
www.foxweather.com
Next Day Error
X - Other
The average global temperature is up a little over 1ºC because of humanity burning hydrocarbons. This is a fact. Climatologists have controlled for all other known variables. If we don't start from a basis of the best science we will be walking willfully blind into catastrophe.
Children born today are 700% more likely to face extremes in weather because of the climate changing so rapidly.
Children born today are 700% more likely to face extremes in weather because of the climate changing so rapidly.
Non liberal
Well-Known Member
You mean pedophile Chomsky.
likely a smear job by the same ppl who smear assange.
ive never heard of that before about master chomsky
Non liberal
Well-Known Member
Oh yeah, he was in court for it. Major pedo.
Non liberal
Well-Known Member
Tainted temperature recordings. They’re using noaa to lie to you. Sorry don’t know how to post the whole article.
Attachments
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
Non liberal
Well-Known Member
Then why do some scientists who actually know what studies were done and also know how to decipher those studies disagree with your assumption? It’s just like the studies on vaccines, instead of using a placebo of sugar water against the vaccine, the “placebo will be sugar water with aluminum in it and then they’ll say, see, you get the same effects from both. Well yeah, perhaps it’s the aluminum in both that’s causing the problem. You really have to look close and know all the variables involved in the studies to know how to actually read the information.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Similar threads
