Another swing and a miss. Like most locals, our officers pensions are the same as the members. In some UPS locals in the Central, officers/agents pensions are worse.
Strike two...If dues was all that concerned the IBT why didn't they legally charge back dues on retro checks for any UPS employee? Our local union lost close to $56,000 by not getting dues increases for those 7 months. Why does the IBT continue to negotiate improved benefit contributions that don't raise one cent of dues revenue?
You need some batting practice.
Why didn't the Union retroactively charge for 7 months? Is this what you're seriously asking? Go ahead and charge members retro for 7 months. See how long you stay in office. Really?
I may have been wrong in collecting dues being the main focus. Collecting dues is probably secondary to keeping their positions.
Improved Benefits is a matter of opinion. I don't see that our benefits have increased. We are fighting to just remain where we are. The retirees have lost a HUGE amount in their Health Benefits. The cost of their health benefits has gone up big, for worse converge. Maybe we'll hear from some retirees who have experienced better coverage, for less cost? I don't know of any. Do you?
"Why does the IBT continue to negotiate improved benefit contributions". This is not even taking into account the retirees who are now taking it in the shorts with drastic cuts to their pensions, AFTER THEY'VE RETIRED! IBT improving benefits? Sorry, but I don't see the improvements. What I see is a Union going after the easy target. The target that can't hit them back through voting. Retirees can't vote. Why were active employees not hit with retro charges?? Active employees can vote!