Coronavirus

zubenelgenubi

I'm a star
Follow the Science:


CDC/Xiao, 2020“Evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza…none of the household studies reported a significant reduction in secondary laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the face mask group…the overall reduction in ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza cases in the face mask group was not significant in either studies.”

Alfelali, 2020“By intention-to-treat analysis, facemask use did not seem to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9 to 2.1, p = 0.18) nor against clinical respiratory infection (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.4, p = 0.40).”

Weber, 1993“We conclude that the protection provided by surgical masks may be insufficient in environments containing potentially hazardous sub-micrometer-sized aerosols.”

Vincent, 2016“We included three trials, involving a total of 2106 participants. There was no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials…from the limited results it is unclear whether the wearing of surgical face masks by members of the surgical team has any impact on surgical wound infection rates for patients undergoing clean surgery.”

2018“We conclude that the filter efficiency test using the phi-X174 phage aerosol may overestimate the protective performance of nonwoven fabrics with filter structure compared to that against real pathogens such as the influenza virus.”

Jacobs, 2009“Face mask use in health care workers has not been demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.”

Alexander, 2021“In fact, it is not unreasonable at this time to conclude that surgical and cloth masks, used as they currently are, have absolutely no impact on controlling the transmission of Covid-19 virus, and current evidence implies that face masks can be actually harmful.”
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy

  • Scientists worldwide are closely tracking an Omicron subtype, called BA.2.
  • In Denmark BA.2 is surpassing the BA.1 Omicron subtype, the most common cause of new COVID-19 cases.
  • It's not yet clear if BA.2 will be more severe or contagious than BA.1.
 

Operational needs

Virescit Vulnere Virtus
296BD90F-768F-4B3E-984D-A6E533F31540.jpeg

So not only are they screwing up the minds of these poor children but they will have reminders of it for years, every time they look at their yearbooks. 😡😡😡
 

Fenris

Well-Known Member

  • Scientists worldwide are closely tracking an Omicron subtype, called BA.2.
  • In Denmark BA.2 is surpassing the BA.1 Omicron subtype, the most common cause of new COVID-19 cases.
  • It's not yet clear if BA.2 will be more severe or contagious than BA.1.
It would appear to the simple minded, such as myself, that if BA.2 is overtaking the highly contagious Omicron then it is more contagious. How else would it be overtaking it? I am losing faith in scientists (not in science)
 

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member

Operational needs

Virescit Vulnere Virtus
‘I have realized that there is an ironic logic to their decision: after all, there’s no point in protecting your brain if you don’t plan on using it.’ Lol
 

Operational needs

Virescit Vulnere Virtus
It really is sad that you fall for this fake news crap. Lol
What’s even more sad is how you’re so brainwashed that you think anything that doesn’t agree with what you believe MUST be fake news, despite proof to the contrary. Or the fact that you think ghetto thug life is something to be glorified. Or the fact that you think living in California is like living in paradise. Or……
 
Top