Coronavirus

zubenelgenubi

I'm a star
no i agree with you people probably havent been wearing a mask properly.

i dont see how social distancing is bad.

Eh, not necessarily bad, but probably not that effective. I prefer to keep a reasonable distance from others most the time anyway, just out of courtesy. And there is no right way to wear a mask to prevent, or even slow, the spread of viruses. You'd need a minimum of a scba for that.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Eh, not necessarily bad, but probably not that effective. I prefer to keep a reasonable distance from others most the time anyway, just out of courtesy. And there is no right way to wear a mask to prevent, or even slow, the spread of viruses. You'd need a minimum of a scba for that.
i dont believe that but i havent kept up on it.

how is staying at home not effective?
 

zubenelgenubi

I'm a star
i dont believe that but i havent kept up on it.

how is staying at home not effective?

Famial clusters have been the largest driving force behind the spread of the virus. Telling people to stay home in close quarters with family members for weeks, non-stop, should be considered depraved indifference to human life.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Famial clusters have been the largest driving force behind the spread of the virus. Telling people to stay home in close quarters with family members for weeks, non-stop, should be considered depraved indifference to human life.
so your saying that countries that didnt wear masks and didnt social distance have done well?

i know consumer reports recommends wearing masks last i checked.

you would think opening up the economy prematurely is indifference to human life too. a family cooped up all together sucks, but maybe children shouldnt be the ones suffering for their parents inability to self regulate how many children they can have.

also if the family is not going out, then how are they going to catch the virus? the failure in this system is the supermarkets. you cant safely get food.
 
Last edited:
Famial clusters have been the largest driving force behind the spread of the virus. Telling people to stay home in close quarters with family members for weeks, non-stop, should be considered depraved indifference to human life.
Telling people to stay home for weeks? If they stayed home for weeks the virus would run its course in the home. Now if they left home and went back home. Yes, they brought the virus from outside the home.
 

tonyexpress

Whac-A-Troll Patrol
Staff member
It's like banging your head against the wall over, and over, and over again...

The vulnerable, those that are elderly, and those with preexisting conditions should be the ONLY ones to quarantine. Don't shut down the entire economy causing much more harm than the virus itself. The list of harm is endless. At first, I was good with staying put for a few weeks so we didn't overwhelm hospitals, now??? This thing is political and full of misinformation, and we are harming many that should've never been harmed. Shame on all the "so-called" experts, politicians, agenda-driven people, and the media.
 

zubenelgenubi

I'm a star
Telling people to stay home for weeks? If they stayed home for weeks the virus would run its course in the home. Now if they left home and went back home. Yes, they brought the virus from outside the home.

It's ok. I can handle someone pointing out my typos. Don't always have time to review before posting. Do you know how long someone can be contagious with very mild symptoms? Where'd you get you "doctoral" degree to know that the virus would have run it's course if everyone stayed home? You are just a preload sup, you never went to "doctoral" school, so you don't have a right to talk about anything (Yes, I'm using your lame and incorrect argument against you to mock you and your lame, incorrect argument).

Did you know that an expedition to a science station in the south pole, wherein all the participants were healthy upon departure, and they remained in isolation from the rest of the world for months, ended up with an outbreak of a cold several weeks in. How could that possibly happen? Unless someone was partially immune, but carried the virus, then, when their immune system became compromised due to being inside for weeks, the virus started spreading because the partial immunity failed and the person got sick. You, and the experts you listen to, know nothing about viruses, or how they spread, apparently.
 
It's ok. I can handle someone pointing out my typos. Don't always have time to review before posting. Do you know how long someone can be contagious with very mild symptoms? Where'd you get you "doctoral" degree to know that the virus would have run it's course if everyone stayed home? You are just a preload sup, you never went to "doctoral" school, so you don't have a right to talk about anything (Yes, I'm using your lame and incorrect argument against you to mock you and your lame, incorrect argument).

Did you know that an expedition to a science station in the south pole, wherein all the participants were healthy upon departure, and they remained in isolation from the rest of the world for months, ended up with an outbreak of a cold several weeks in. How could that possibly happen? Unless someone was partially immune, but carried the virus, then, when their immune system became compromised due to being inside for weeks, the virus started spreading because the partial immunity failed and the person got sick. You, and the experts you listen to know nothing about viruses, or how they spread, apparently.
Here we go, he has no point. But, he‘ll write a book.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
Deaths have plummeted.

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Deaths - Statistics and Research

1.png


2.png
 
Top