deepsouthmamaw
Well-Known Member
oh ok guess thats why they r getting rid of marketing ppl the drivers have to do your job now so u have none
I thought I heard they are hiring marketing execs off the street.[/QUOTE ) You mean the ones with the hand written cardboard "work for food" signs?
They were primarily let go based on their results from last year's Marketing Competency Assessment. Last year, based on recommendations from McKinsey consulting, everyone in marketing was ranked by their manager on several core areas of marketing skills. Yes, some of the people that got laid off were not good employees. But, many of them seem to have gotten low scores on that assessment because they were not liked by their manager or because they had recently been asked to move into Marketing. Some were even PROMOTED recently! Then, BOOM, sorry, you don't have the skills we need, we'll NDA you your stuff. Something don't smell right about this.
One observation was that there was a MUCH higher proportion of employees laid off that had minority / double-minority status, relative to the proportion of minority people at UPS. Many women and african-americans. Could some subconscious level of implicit racism/not liking people that are different, by their managers, have played a role? I hope not. :-(
PS I've heard from a senior manager at corp. that other corp. departments should expect cuts. Some rumor-based guesses: Shared Services, HR, Automotive, Sales Training.
You must not make any money
sorry that should read YOU would not make any money
oh ok guess thats why they r getting rid of marketing ppl the drivers have to do your job now so u have none
I thought I heard they are hiring marketing execs off the street.
They were primarily let go based on their results from last year's Marketing Competency Assessment. Last year, based on recommendations from McKinsey consulting, everyone in marketing was ranked by their manager on several core areas of marketing skills. Yes, some of the people that got laid off were not good employees. But, many of them seem to have gotten low scores on that assessment because they were not liked by their manager or because they had recently been asked to move into Marketing. Some were even PROMOTED recently! Then, BOOM, sorry, you don't have the skills we need, we'll NDA you your stuff. Something don't smell right about this.
One observation was that there was a MUCH higher proportion of employees laid off that had minority / double-minority status, relative to the proportion of minority people at UPS. Many women and african-americans. Could some subconscious level of implicit racism/not liking people that are different, by their managers, have played a role? I hope not. :-(
PS I've heard from a senior manager at corp. that other corp. departments should expect cuts. Some rumor-based guesses: Shared Services, HR, Automotive, Sales Training.
Sure hate to tell you this, but it was never there to begin with. The (let them eat cake) mentality and study your history and see where this is heading....Now I'm not sure of the rumors you mention, but the first part of this post is true. It was not as objective as it should have been and some good, talented people were let go. The whole culture of this company has changed! So much for "promotion from within"! So much for "career development"! So much for the "partnership" concept - but then that's been gone for while now.
if you want to be the spelling and blogging police that might be a good job for youwow. and I am the one calling people out. you said people should be paid by their work performance. you guys are the one dumping all your work on the drivers. maybe if you did the work you guys dumped on the drivers you guys would still have something to do and you ppl would still have a job
is that what you really mean? MY PAY IS BASED ON PERFORMANCE. jerky.that would be jerket to you
was that sent from your blackberry? vry gd skilz haz u
From what I heard, they put them all in a conference room, let them know it was their last day and then told them they will be walked out and their personal belongings will be sent to them. Ouch.
I'm not sure I would have left without time to collect my personal items. There aren't too many LP folks around big enough to bounce me out of the club and the police would not support my being forced to leave without my personal items.
Good point - these folks probably access to a lot of "propriety" information.This seems to be a common corporate thing anymore, escorting former employees off the property,I've heard of this happening elsewhere. As far as I know the police would support this. You are an "at-will" employee, other than your briefcase or purse anything in your desk could be considered company property. It is a shame you can't get your pesonal photos or whatever. They don't want you sneaking that disc of confidential information with you.
Like what? The colonels secret ingredients? The next mullet commercial to air? They were treated like crap! Bottom line! Its uncalled for and we will all see the ripple effects hurting this company down the road.
Believe it or not, there are e-mails, memos, initiative description, etc. that UPS would like to keep out of lawyers and competitors hands.Like what? The colonels secret ingredients? The next mullet commercial to air?
While not SOP for United Parcel Service this is what other companies have been doing for years (including FedEx). UPS is just implementing Best Practices from Consultants and benchmarked companies. Terminating people that have not committed a terminatible offense is new territory for UPS but I know UPS researched this ... we always do!They were treated like crap! Bottom line! Its uncalled for and we will all see the ripple effects hurting this company down the road.
Like what? The colonels secret ingredients? The next mullet commercial to air? They were treated like crap! Bottom line! Its uncalled for and we will all see the ripple effects hurting this company down the road.
So much about being "Union Free".Believe it or not, there are e-mails, memos, initiative description, etc. that UPS would like to keep out of lawyers and competitors hands.
While not SOP for United Parcel Service this is what other companies have been doing for years (including FedEx). UPS is just implementing Best Practices from Consultants and benchmarked companies. Terminating people that have not committed a terminatible offense is new territory for UPS but I know UPS researched this ... we always do!
This is actually easier on the terminated employees and much less unsettling on the employees that stay. The bottom-line is that no matter how this is handled, it is still unsettling and demotivating to the remaining workforce.
As far as the ripple effect ... time will tell.
PS - Red, I am on vacation today ... just so you don't think I'm posting from work.![]()
Believe it or not, there are e-mails, memos, initiative description, etc. that UPS would like to keep out of lawyers and competitors hands.
While not SOP for United Parcel Service this is what other companies have been doing for years (including FedEx). UPS is just implementing Best Practices from Consultants and benchmarked companies. Terminating people that have not committed a terminatible offense is new territory for UPS but I know UPS researched this ... we always do!
This is actually easier on the terminated employees and much less unsettling on the employees that stay. The bottom-line is that no matter how this is handled, it is still unsettling and demotivating to the remaining workforce.
As far as the ripple effect ... time will tell.
PS - Red, I am on vacation today ... just so you don't think I'm posting from work.![]()
Believe it or not, there are e-mails, memos, initiative description, etc. that UPS would like to keep out of lawyers and competitors hands.
While not SOP for United Parcel Service this is what other companies have been doing for years (including FedEx). UPS is just implementing Best Practices from Consultants and benchmarked companies. Terminating people that have not committed a terminatible offense is new territory for UPS but I know UPS researched this ... we always do!
This is actually easier on the terminated employees and much less unsettling on the employees that stay. The bottom-line is that no matter how this is handled, it is still unsettling and demotivating to the remaining workforce.
As far as the ripple effect ... time will tell.
PS - Red, I am on vacation today ... just so you don't think I'm posting from work.![]()
SOP, and that is what has seserated us from everyone else, we have never operated like tht. This company has been run like the biggest family owned company forever. People mattered at the time when I started, now we are no different than Fedex in your own words. We thoought Eskew was bad? Davis is worse ad he has broght his outside influence in and done away with the way UPS should be run.
Evevryone should be pissed over this! Boycott the stock, some kind of employee uprising in retaliation!