We had a driver pass last yr. No wife no kids. Union kept it all. He had 20 yrs
A lump sum payment to his parents or sister. But, now that our local is cutting our pensions 45%. I will be the oldest driver in ups history. I am so anti union right now. Makes me sick
While I appreciate your compassion, it would be illegal for the pension fund to do that.
Where are you getting the 45% figure from? Did you guys have your meeting on the 5th?
Yes. Retirees also. Gonna try to be the 1st driver to have an electric scooter installed for deliver. Pension has 14k drawing. With 9500 working. It's unsustainable
While I appreciate your compassion, it would be illegal for the pension fund to do that.
Where are you getting the 45% figure from? Did you guys have your meeting on the 5th?
It's highly unlikely this is accurate. The "union" didn't keep anything as they aren't the pension plan. The Pension plan may not have dispersed a benefit if the terms of eligibility weren't met, but with 20 yrs, he's definitely vested. Therefore, the designated beneficiary would receive some type of benefit, normally sixty certain payments or a lump sum.We had a driver pass last yr. No wife no kids. Union kept it all. He had 20 yrs
It's highly unlikely this is accurate. The "union" didn't keep anything as they aren't the pension plan. The Pension plan may not have dispersed a benefit if the terms of eligibility weren't met, but with 20 yrs, he's definitely vested. Therefore, the designated beneficiary would receive some type of benefit, normally sixty certain payments or a lump sum.
He had no beneficiary listed. Family got nothing.
A lump sum payment to his parents or sister. But, now that our local is cutting our pensions 45%. I will be the oldest driver in ups history. I am so anti union right now. Makes me sick
And you're using this example to justify your displeasure with the union? So this guy didn't go through the monumental effort of listing a beneficiary, and that becomes a union deficiency? BTW, the "union" doesn't change your pension benefit, the pension fund does.He had no beneficiary listed. Family got nothing.
And you're using this example to justify your displeasure with the union? So this guy didn't go through the monumental effort of listing a beneficiary, and that becomes a union deficiency? BTW, the "union" doesn't change your pension benefit, the pension fund does.
His estate may have a claim depending on your state law.
The pension fund did what they were supposed to do based upon the rules of the fund.
So what's the answer? Should the plan trustees guess who he wanted as beneficiaries? I get the irritation, but it's 100% on him. The Fund didn't seize anything, he left it there by his inaction. Without a spouse/kids the Fund has no way to determine who of his surviving family gets how much. That was his call.No the displeasure is all mine. I just feel a lump payment to his family instead of seizure of the entire yrs is wrong.
All I remember is that I took every dime I could get and the wife would be on her own after I died. (We did agree on that)
Find this impossible to believe. His pension would go to his estate. If no will or beneficiaries are listed, then intestacy would apply.He had no beneficiary listed. Family got nothing.
Find this impossible to believe. His pension would go to his estate. If no will or beneficiaries are listed, then intestacy would apply.
Must be because of your state estate/inheritance laws. In Wisconsin his pension would fall to his estate with 60 certain payments.Nope. My steward and I looked into it also. His fault for not listing his sister or parent.