barnyard
KTM rider
Has anyone here tested any of the potential Diad 5 devices?????
They were in my center 2 weeks ago and I was chosen to test one for a day. I wrote up 2 pages critiquing my test unit (I hated it, the people that recommended the device I used are the suckiest bunch of sucks that have ever sucked.) The 1st paragraph read something like, "If I were a decision maker, I would not waste anymore development money on this device...."
There were 4 units, 2 that looked usable and 2 that looked like a complete waste of time. To me, the disappointing thing was that a supe from another center rode with us to sheet with Diad 4 because the test devices could not communicate with UPS. I say disappointing because most of the other drivers gave the bare minimum amount of feedback and noone else wrote suggestions or why they particularly liked or disliked a device.
Seems that if a diad design person would have gone along, they could have learned a bunch more about why a driver would do well with a board and why he/she would not do well. There were alot of things that came up during the day that the driver supe and I talked about that could make Diad 4 or the next diad better, that I forgot about by the time I got to the person from Maryland (I think that's where she was from....) I think I wrote up about 1/2 of the stuff that I went over during the day.
So, if you were one of the testers, how was your experience???
TB
They were in my center 2 weeks ago and I was chosen to test one for a day. I wrote up 2 pages critiquing my test unit (I hated it, the people that recommended the device I used are the suckiest bunch of sucks that have ever sucked.) The 1st paragraph read something like, "If I were a decision maker, I would not waste anymore development money on this device...."
There were 4 units, 2 that looked usable and 2 that looked like a complete waste of time. To me, the disappointing thing was that a supe from another center rode with us to sheet with Diad 4 because the test devices could not communicate with UPS. I say disappointing because most of the other drivers gave the bare minimum amount of feedback and noone else wrote suggestions or why they particularly liked or disliked a device.
Seems that if a diad design person would have gone along, they could have learned a bunch more about why a driver would do well with a board and why he/she would not do well. There were alot of things that came up during the day that the driver supe and I talked about that could make Diad 4 or the next diad better, that I forgot about by the time I got to the person from Maryland (I think that's where she was from....) I think I wrote up about 1/2 of the stuff that I went over during the day.
So, if you were one of the testers, how was your experience???
TB