SKAGITDRIVER
Well-Known Member
you report to work and if that work wants you to line up and walk through a guard shack/metal detector fine but pay me for it
you report to work and if that work wants you to line up and walk through a guard shack/metal detector fine but pay me for it
I never stand in line at Walmart. They can have someone else's money, not this union member's.
Good point!Put the timeclock before the guard shack. Bet your ass the check in will take half as long if your getting paid to do it!!
if mgmt is there and wants to start playing talky- talky ask if you`re on the clock. if not they can wait or put you on. i would ask for a steward if it headed in the direction that one was needed.i this this topic has way of the track. the topic is about if weigarten applys to UPS managers asking questions at the guard shack. we have always had (going out) to be searched at ups addison but this was done by Silverhawk Security and not ups management. now ups management has placed themselves in the guard shack and have been harassing people. but i do like the idea of getting paid to stand inline for a security check
i this this topic has way of the track. the topic is about if weigarten applys to UPS managers asking questions at the guard shack. we have always had (going out) to be searched at ups addison but this was done by Silverhawk Security and not ups management. now ups management has placed themselves in the guard shack and have been harassing people. but i do like the idea of getting paid to stand inline for a security check
This doesn't seem to be a gray area to me.
We are paid for our time and if the circumstances change to were it takes an inordinate amount of time to negotiate the security check, then maybe UPS will need to expand their guard shack capabilities.
In the workplace to classify something as a normal day to day delay to me is an oxymoron.
It would be better labeled as planned opulence if it was permitted to continue.
Insufficient parking would be a parallel issue.
A grievance seems to the right course of action.
This doesn't seem to be a gray area to me.
We are paid for our time and if the circumstances change to were it takes an inordinate amount of time to negotiate the security check, then maybe UPS will need to expand their guard shack capabilities.
In the workplace to classify something as a normal day to day delay to me is an oxymoron.
It would be better labeled as planned opulence if it was permitted to continue.
Insufficient parking would be a parallel issue.
A grievance seems to the right course of action.
What an awesome message to send to the hourlies working in the hub. You need more hours this week? Just call in a threat, UPS will have to pay you extra time for the effort they put into keeping you safe from your own threat.
Awesome. Just awesome.
What an awesome message to send to the hourlies working in the hub. You need more hours this week? Just call in a threat, UPS will have to pay you extra time for the effort they put into keeping you safe from your own threat.
Awesome. Just awesome.
How do you get that from my post?
But he should still grieve to get paid from his scheduled start time. There is no way he should be docked that time because there is a line to get into the building.
From reading all the posts it appears there was a unscheduled delay and he has the right to grieve. But if this was a normal day to day delay,at that start time,then he should plan accordingly to arrive with time to spare.
Depending on our start or leave time at the Cach you can sail right through the shack or be in line with hundreds,same as finding a parking spot. It`s not UPS` fault that you arrive with others unprepared to go through.
This doesn't seem to be a gray area to me.
We are paid for our time and if the circumstances change to were it takes an inordinate amount of time to negotiate the security check, then maybe UPS will need to expand their guard shack capabilities.
In the workplace to classify something as a normal day to day delay to me is an oxymoron.
It would be better labeled as planned opulence if it was permitted to continue.
Insufficient parking would be a parallel issue.
A grievance seems to the right course of action.
Can you read?