At what income separates the two?...and the divide between the "haves and have nots" grows ever steeper.
Several. Biggest is probably the roughly 50% that have nothing in the stock market.At what income separates the two?
They should either be smarter or work harder.Several. Biggest is probably the roughly 50% that have nothing in the stock market.
40k? 50k? I hear that from time to time, but never know what income is a "have not"?Several. Biggest is probably the roughly 50% that have nothing in the stock market.
Good point. But do you think a family of 5 making 50k a year can afford investment? If wages have remained basically flat, pensions bankrupted, and education costs constantly on the rise, where does investment income come from?40k? 50k? I hear that from time to time, but never know what income is a "have not"?
Or change the rules.They should either be smarter or work harder.
Cramerism that makes sense: Bears make money. Bulls make money. Pigs get slaughtered.So time to get out, wait for the correction, then back in?
You're a maroon if you have 3 kids and only make 50k a yearGood point. But do you think a family of 5 making 50k a year can afford investment? If wages have remained basically flat, pensions bankrupted, and education costs constantly on the rise, where does investment income come from?
The country is full of morons.You're a maroon if you have 3 kids and only make 50k a year
To what?Or change the rules.
Yeah it is and they already get more than enough handed to them.The country is full of morons.
The taxation rules. Didn't you get just a little queasy hearing that Republicans wanted to limit 401(k) contributions to $2400 per year to pay for tax breaks at the top?To what?
This isn't 1990 where everyone needs to buy thru a broker.
Some people will always have loads of cash. Some people will always be broke. Just the way it is. No matter what the rules are.
For starters doing so would be political suicide.The taxation rules. Didn't you get just a little queasy hearing that Republicans wanted to limit 401(k) contributions to $2400 per year to pay for tax breaks at the top?
Now who's getting too much handed to them?
How about the ones on welfare that have 6 kids.You're a maroon if you have 3 kids and only make 50k a year
if you take the top rate down 1 percent the rich will get a tax break. They have more money so the 1 percent would be bigger for them. However it isnt the rate, it is the deductions they get.The taxation rules. Didn't you get just a little queasy hearing that Republicans wanted to limit 401(k) contributions to $2400 per year to pay for tax breaks at the top?
Now who's getting too much handed to them?
Yes and no.the dow going up is good for pensions that are in trouble
Political suicide that was being seriously considered.For starters doing so would be political suicide.
Second it wouldn't cap the contributions at $2400 only the tax break.
Third you're talking about an ultra rich elite that will never play by the same rules. That's just a fact. If they are playing by the same rules we've collapsed America as it is and would be living in hell essentially