Elon Musk Exposes the Hatred of Free Speech

floridays

Well-Known Member
If you call this a response to your claim that we can can be saved like the thief on the cross and not by what Jesus told his disciples to preach to save the world..I can't help you because this isn't exchange.

Abraham lived in the Patriarchal age.
The thief lived in the Mosaic age.
We live in the gospel (Christian age)age.
God's dealings and requirements for people were different in every age.
The gospel dispensation is the last age.
We do.

Jesus Christ is eternal, the same yesterday, today, and forever.
I think the problem resides in your head, you attempt to make things conform to how you want them to be.

Was water baptism required to be deemed righteous?

Has believing, trusting God's word, believing what God says been constant, old and new testament?

Being declared righteous is what we are seeking.
How to be declared righteous, what is required is the question.

What remains unchanged, what is demanded from God, who is the same yesterday, today and forever is the question.

Believing God, trusting Him is the constant, old and new testament.

Don't believe that, just ask Abraham and the thief on the cross.
Both have been justified, neither have been water baptized.
Both however have been baptized.

You have to have something to boast about. Keep up your part of the deal, you work under a conditional pardon.

In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace; (Galatians 3:6)

Nothing for me to boast about in the bolded above, I'm satisfied.
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
We do.

Jesus Christ is eternal, the same yesterday, today, and forever.
I think the problem resides in your head, you attempt to make things conform to how you want them to be.

Was water baptism required to be deemed righteous?

Has believing, trusting God's word, believing what God says been constant, old and new testament?

Being declared righteous is what we are seeking.
How to be declared righteous, what is required is the question.

What remains unchanged, what is demanded from God, who is the same yesterday, today and forever is the question.

Believing God, trusting Him is the constant, old and new testament.

Don't belive that, just ask Abraham and the thief on the cross.
Both have been justified, neither have been water baptized.
Both however have been baptized.

You have to have something to boast about. Keep up your part of the deal, you work under a conditional pardon.

In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace; (Galatians 3:6)

Nothing for me to boast about in the bolded above, I'm satisfied.
How and when do the scriptures teach one comes in contact with the blood in order to receive the forgiveness of his sins because of his grace?
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
I'm gonna play your silly game with your rules.
You answer my questions, I'll respond in kind.
I thought I did.
Your verse is a good one.
My silly question you refuse to answer comes right from it .
How and when do the scriptures teach one comes in contact with the blood in order to receive the forgiveness of his sins because of his grace?

You got an answer?
 

floridays

Well-Known Member
I was talking about anyone disagreeing with him is an attack.
I gathered that. A response to a challenged position is just that. His observation dealt with challenges that didn't deal with the subject being discussed.
Correct me if I'm in error @Fred's Myth.

There is nothing wrong with attacking an idea, agressive rebuttal or advocacy is to be commended in support of one's well thought beliefs or positions. In fact it is required if one makes claims.

That's just the way I see it, it's my opinion.
In my view I wish I was more constrained and as succinct as he is.

Alas, I'm the mouthy type.

Fred could have said all I just did in three sentences. And not the run on type I'm famous for.

Just my opinion
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
We do.

Jesus Christ is eternal, the same yesterday, today, and forever.
Yes.
I think the problem resides in your head, you attempt to make things conform to how you want them to be.

Was water baptism required to be deemed righteous?
Not until the great commission.
Has believing, trusting God's word, believing what God says been constant, old and new testament?
Definitely
Being declared righteous is what we are seeking.
Definitely
How to be declared righteous, what is required is the question.

What remains unchanged, what is demanded from God, who is the same yesterday, today and forever is the question.
No… God does not require you to raise a knife to kill your son as Abraham God does not require you to sacrifice animals on an alter as Moses.. God does require you today to listen and obey his son.
Believing God, trusting Him is the constant, old and new testament.
Yes
Don't believe that, just ask Abraham and the thief on the cross.
Both have been justified, neither have been water baptized.
Both however have been baptized.
Abraham could be obedient the gospel. Jesus wasn’t around.Different dispensations required different commands.
You have to have something to boast about. Keep up your part of the deal, you work under a conditional pardon
I have nothing to boast about. I was obedient to what Jesus, Peter, Paul taught and because I was responded to what they said to do and did not reject it , I was forgiven because of the grace and mercy and became a Christian .

In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace; (Galatians 3:6)

Nothing for me to boast about in the bolded above, I'm satisfied.

Deal with post 221, you may find some of the answers you seek.
 

floridays

Well-Known Member
How and when do the scriptures teach one comes in contact with the blood in order to receive the forgiveness of his sins because of his grace?
Old testament when someone took a spotless lamb to the priest to have it's blood shed on their behalf.
They did as proscribed by law if they believed the blood of that spotless lamb would satisfy God.

In Exodus for the death angel to passover blood was placed on the door casing, it just happened to be in the likeness of a cross.

In the new testament God provided the spotless, unblemished Lamb, Jesus. Just as he supplied the sacrifice for Abraham. Abraham believed God and it was counted to him as righteousness.

God the father slaughtered another Lamb, on my behalf. God has been clear why His son was slain from the foundation of the world, to pay for my sin. I see the Lamb God provided, I believe why he was placed there, and the Blood God shed is accounted to me. His blood is credited to my account precisely the moment I believe exactly why His Lambs Blood was shed.

When I was water baptized it was merely a picture, outwardly, of an event that had already happened. I had already been placed in Jesus death, and raised to life.

You reject all I say here, and will count this as a non answer because it does not satisfy you.

Keep up the terms of your pardon, You are still under the Law of Moses.
The shed blood of Jesus is not sufficient for you, and there will not be another spotless Lamb, be on your P's and Q's.
 
Last edited:

floridays

Well-Known Member
Abraham could be obedient the gospel. Jesus wasn’t around.Different dispensations required different commands.
Jesus wasn't was around?

Scripture claims there was nothing made that was not made by Jesus.

Is that a correct statement?

Was Jesus around for all "dispensations?"
 

Shift Inhibit

He who laughs last didn't get it.
DC9E73AC-C77A-4ADF-8B46-510535BA01DD.jpeg
 
Top