Would you like to name which of this pathetic bunch has their priorities backwards? Quite judgemental on your part. It is a fact, that the truth has been covered up, and we would like to know why. Not one of the witnesses said there was not enough time for some back up to get there. A flyover would have sent the attackers scurrying for cover. I never heard them say the event was over long before any help could be sent. They were told not to go by Someone. Us pathetics who do not worship the ground our government walks on would like to know who that was, and why.
I have noticed that most of us pathetics, post our views without namecalling. I think it is pathetic when multitudes disagree with you, that for some reason you get to be judge and jury on our intelligence.
No one reports you any more because most just ignore you. I happen to think this is an important topic so I keep reading it. I could appreciate your opinion, if you could do it without slander. But that's just you, you need to throw the insult in, because for some strange, deranged reason, you think it solidifies your point. It don't.
Not being judgemental, the thoughts and expressions about bengazi by the majority group in current events speak for themselves. You say the "TRUTH" has been covered up. So I again ASK you, what is the truth???
You have no clue what that is, and you have to wait until you are again told what to believe before you could even possibly answer the question. TO you "hunt at any cost" crowd, you are searching for a ghost.
"WHO CHANGED THE TALKING POINTS", "WHO GAVE THE ORDER TO STAND DOWN"... blah blah blah... WHO CARES?
Did the talking points kill the ambassador? Did the talking points affect the militarys inability to mobilized sooner? The event was going to happen anyways. The outcome would have still remained the same.
As your for your knowledge, the reason you havent heard about the testimony about responses, it goes without saying that you DIDNT listen to the hearings, and the selective hearing you do have is all based on what is presented to you by FOX NEWS.
Here's Leon Pannetas explanation about the events, since you SAID you didnt hear it the first time..
WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. military did not quickly intervene during the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya last month because military leaders did not have adequate intelligence information and felt they should not put American forces at risk, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Thursday.
In his most extensive comments to date on the unfolding controversy surrounding the attack in Benghazi, Panetta said U.S. forces were on heightened alert because of the anniversary of 9/11 and prepared to respond. But,
he said, the attack happened over a few hours and was over before the U.S. had the chance to know what was really occurring.
"(The) basic principle is that you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on; without having some real-time information about what's taking place," Panetta told Pentagon reporters. "And as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation."
Panetta: US lacked early info on Benghazi attack
Understand now?
In war and on the battlefield, there are "calls" that have to be made. Sometimes, people are in harms way, and decisions to not send help depend on the likelyhood of rescue. If the rescue would then endanger more lives , then its not sent. Those people at the CIA black site and the temp embassy were dead meat either way.
Maybe if Darryl Issas CUT to the defense of our embassys worldwide hadnt reduced the ability to protect our ambassadors, they would be alive today. But I BET this is something you will reject. YOUR very own political party was DIRECTLY responsible for cutting the funding for protection, and YET, drone on today about why these people were killed and adequate security wasnt provided.
YOU rely on a news source whos only intention is to MISLEAD you, to FOOL you, to TREAT you like a maroon and to KEEP you in the pathetic crowd.
Americans that were PAYING ATTENTION to the hearings HEARD L Panetta state that help wasnt send because the EVENT WAS OVER and he wasnt going to endanger further lives without knowing the full extent of the attack.
You apparently, were one of the minority voters who werent paying attention.
As for the name calling, listen bro, your "gang" does most of the name calling around these parts, and just because your the majority around here doesnt mean that YOUR side has it right. Respect is something that is earned, and while I accept that I am on the "other side" of you all, I take what is dished out without reporting anyone.
Maybe , if you could step away from fox news long enough to research your own facts, you would walk away from this non issue, but your hatred for our president will not allow you to do that. He only has 3 years remaining, and he will be out. Hopefully, you all can go on with your lives after that point.
But for now, its about attempting to hurt the president with useless charges against his character, and also, to attempt to scare Hillary for 2016. This political theatre being conducted by the republicans in the house is laughable at best, and the reason WHY the GOP will lose the house in 2014.
The jokes on you TOONER, whether you like it or not.
Peace
TOS
Because the company you work for isnt going to hire more workers to cover for you when you are off.
