Ending DACA

[oldngray]

How exactly
What changes in another executive order would be acceptable to Roberts?

Roberts asmits DACA is illegal but twists things with excuses. Trump is making the changes Roberts wanted and going to file again but Roberts will find some other excuse when it comes to him again.

 

[It will be fine]

How exactly
What changes in another executive order would be acceptable to Roberts?

An actual justification for the change in policy that considers its impact on people and society.

 

[vantexan]

Lol!, Worse coverage?!?!? More Americans had insurance that covered more conditions and therapies under Obama than at any other time in history!!

Why didn't he fix DACA? You do know who had to implement DACA because Congress refused to do anything right?

He had complete control for two years. Why wasn't it fixed then? And by worse coverage I should be more clear. Americans are now responsible for more of the costs with much higher deductibles.

 

[vantexan]

Because no solution exists politically and democratically. Only peaceful separation.

They are playing political football with people's lives. Both sides. We should do everything possible to stop the flow of illegals but little kids brought over are innocent victims. This is their home and all they know. They should be allowed to stay and not have a cloud over their status. Unless they commit a felony.

 

[Wally]

An actual justification for the change in policy that considers its impact on people and society.

The court rules on laws legalities, not impacts. That is the job of the other two branches.

 

[oldngray]

DACA was never meant to be a permanent solution. Obama justified his executive order by calling it a temporary measure until Congress did something.

 

[Wally]

Horowitz: Time for Trump and conservatives to crush judicial supremacy. Here’s how. | Blaze Media

Where to go from here.

www.conservativereview.com

 

[Wally]

DACA was never meant to be a permanent solution. Obama justified his executive order by calling it a temporary measure until Congress did something.

John Roberts and his posse now are congress. They make the law.

 

[oldngray]

John Roberts and his posse now are congress. They make the law.

You have to wonder who has dirt on Roberts to get him to make these decisions.

 

[Wally]

You have to wonder who has dirt on Roberts to get him to make these decisions.

I think he's an swamp dweller elitist who sees it as his calling to preserve the Obama legacy.

 

[It will be fine]

The court rules on laws legalities, not impacts. That is the job of the other two branches.

The law requires a justification that takes into account the impacts of EOs.

 

[oldngray]

The law requires a justification that takes into account the impacts of EOs.

No it doesn't.

 

[Wally]

The law requires a justification that takes into account the impacts of EOs.

Where's that in the constitution?

 

[It will be fine]

No it doesn't.

According to the SCOTUS it does.

 

[It will be fine]

Where's that in the constitution?

Ask the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

 

[oldngray]

According to the SCOTUS it does.

Nope. Not what the SCOTUS said. And they can't write laws.

 

[Serf]

They are playing political football with people's lives. Both sides. We should do everything possible to stop the flow of illegals but little kids brought over are innocent victims. This is their home and all they know. They should be allowed to stay and not have a cloud over their status. Unless they commit a felony.

Agree to disagree Van. As much as it pains me, even the most beautiful latinas with babies in tow have to go back.

 

[It will be fine]

Agree to disagree Van. As much as it pains me, even the most beautiful latinas with babies in tow have to go back.

So a child raised in the states, educated with our tax dollars that is now gainfully employed as an adult should be deported to a country they’ve never known? Who benefits exactly?

 

[vantexan]

Agree to disagree Van. As much as it pains me, even the most beautiful latinas with babies in tow have to go back.

Their culture isn't Mexican or Honduran or whatever. They didn't break the law, their parents did. Send them back to what exactly? Poverty? Too bad for them? I'm 100% for sending any convicted felon back. Staying in the States would be a privilege, not a right, and breaking the law loses that privilege. I just think we're a bigger, better country than one that would destroy people's lives by playing politics.

 

[Fred's Myth]

So a child raised in the states, educated with our tax dollars that is now gainfully employed as an adult should be deported to a country they’ve never known? Who benefits exactly?

You paint an idealistic picture. What about a realistic picture? That adult could just as easily be a welfare burden, or a criminal.
A one-size-fits-all solution won’t work. That’s why forcing Congress to do their job is necessary.