I gave you a case where the court not only recognized it, but cited it in another case. They recognize it, you don't. Not my problem.
First, You never gave me any case where Fedex was respondent or a party regarding classification.
What you just just posted is a is a misrepresentation at best, a lie if offered to deceive.
Second, No case exists with Fedex answering to a challenge of their designation.
It can easily be put to bed. All it takes is for the Western Division drivers to wake up in the morning and refuse to go to work.
If a strike injunction (demand to appear at work) is issued, who will the injunction be delivered to and how?
This classification determines only one thing, who will represent the class.
@MAKAVELI, work your ass off to organize, it won't take all the Western Divison.
Put what I say to the test.