grgrcr88
No It's not green grocer!
As to the termination, I would like more info as well as to why he was terminated. The fact that he was allowed to finish his day after the crash would mean the company could not terminate him for the crash. There has to be other circumstances involved.
Also, in the Central, to be terminatd for a crash it must be (Article 17(d)) "gross negligence, resulting in a serious accident. A serious accident is defined as one in which there is a fatality, a bodily injury to a person who, as a result of the injury, receives immediate medical treatment away from the scene of the accident, or $4400 or more in damages."
or(friend) "failure to report an accident that the driver had or should have had knowledge of"
or(g) "an avoidable runaway accident"
I know other supplements are different but I have been involved in several cases that the company allowed the driver to continue work after the crash and the worst that any of them ever got was a warning letter.
I would like to hear all the details to this case as well as the outcome of the meeting Monday.
Also, in the Central, to be terminatd for a crash it must be (Article 17(d)) "gross negligence, resulting in a serious accident. A serious accident is defined as one in which there is a fatality, a bodily injury to a person who, as a result of the injury, receives immediate medical treatment away from the scene of the accident, or $4400 or more in damages."
or(friend) "failure to report an accident that the driver had or should have had knowledge of"
or(g) "an avoidable runaway accident"
I know other supplements are different but I have been involved in several cases that the company allowed the driver to continue work after the crash and the worst that any of them ever got was a warning letter.
I would like to hear all the details to this case as well as the outcome of the meeting Monday.