Lifer
I find your narrow definition of a war president remarkably strange since we now have wars that last decades with American troops in harms way and potential casualties on multiple fronts. Is a president's prosecution of a war 10 years later any less harrowing? I think you should reconsider.
Also, we were not thrown into war with Iraq. We walked right into that one.
So what is your definition of a war president?
Because, every president from the mid 20th century could be categorized as a war president. My definition is more of a reaction to being attacked. A war president puts processes and procedures in place to keep America secure and safe. The key point to me is we were attacked and went to war. We were put on the defensive reeling back on our heels, and had to take the offensive.
Protecting another nation is different to me. Starting your term during an occupation and withdrawal is different also.
Also, you were putting words in my mouth. I never said anything about about being thrown into a war with Iraq.