The only people who take Al serious are mostly verbal spin doctors of political narratives. For the one time I might see Al's name mentioned among those who hold the global warming view, I see his name mentioned 20 times by a political opposition mostly related to the GOP. Everytime the temp hit below 32 degrees, here it comes. I've not been to Drudge but I'm betting somewhere in his page today will be weather stories. Not that I'm opposed to weather stories either but the whole thing is a framed political narrative as opposed to any real discussion of the facts of what is actually known. One of the reasons I posted Judith Curry's interview on Econ Talk above which I'm laying odds you never even gave the first thought of listening too.
Al Gore among the hardcore climate change folk is a joke. A midway carney who is all about selling the idea of a tax model to which he in turn built a
commodity investment model (that's collapsed for the moment) on which he can profit. Gore's model doesn't make global warming go away, it would insure it because it creates a profit center in which CO2 for example would need to thrive into order for his market to grow. Why would you create a profit motive to something bad if the idea was to make it do away or could you be trying to create a monopoly?
Go check out Al Gore's investment company
Generation Investment Management and then read the
white paper from Oct. 2013' still pushing for a commodity infrastructure for greenhouse gases.
You wanna discuss Al Gore? Then bone up and let's discuss his real motives and not feed the false dilemmas of political spin.
because we all know why their is a hoax of global warming? ($$$$)
