Your pres. wants to make it impossible for the coal companies.............impossible regulations..........seems like cutting off your nose to spite your face.I know it's hard to grasp the concept, but no one has said we need or can switch in one day. But there is a need to invest in the future and reduce the use of fossil fuels as much and fast as we can. Technology is advancing very fast and it is possible. But the closed minded will always live in the past and refuse to embrace technology and progression. Good luck with that.
Your pres. wants to make it impossible for the coal companies.............impossible regulations..........seems like cutting off your nose to spite your face.
That doesn't mean we should just give up. Technology and science are constantly evolving.
You're right. Give up now, surrender to the people YOU really hate, and screw our grandkids.No one does't want to find viable alternatives. Scientists and engineers have been working forever to find some. So far, fossil fuels still make the best overall energy source. The replacement is likely something beyond anything we can comprehend right now. It's going to be all about oil, natural gas, coal, and nuclear for years to come. Whether you like it or not.
You're right. Give up now, surrender to the people YOU really hate, and screw our grandkids.
Lyin' gubbemint scientists...
Pretty soon you'll have Easter Bunny foot prints across the hood of that car.View attachment 12139 No global warming here?
The $1.3 million, eighteen-month project will deploy the Altaeros BAT at a height 1,000 feet above ground.
It's called research. Research always costs money. We wouldn't have the technology today without " investing" in research.The $1.3 million, eighteen-month project will deploy the Altaeros BAT at a height 1,000 feet above ground.
“The project will generate enough energy to power over a dozen homes."
Not exactly a cost effective solution. Just a PR stunt.
1 out of 70. 1 out of 70. 1 out of 70. Hmmm.......One of the 70 authors of a draft U.N. report on climate change said he had pulled out of the writing team because it was "alarmist" about the threat.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/27/us-climatechange-idUSBREA2Q1FX20140327