All this talk about what is legitimate science or blindly believing what is said to be widely accepted science or criticizing those that may doubt global warming as science deniers....
How about an example this past week of a wide scientific study that has disproved the link between saturated fat and heart disease. It was absolute science before that saturated fat was a direct link to heart disease. You notice each month such new studies arise concerning diet and nutrition and its affects on the human body basically disprove previous scientific belief. It's the 21st century and we can't figure out how food affects the body over a relative short period of time.
Climate studies are looking at a tiny spec of time in a timeline that spans billions of years. We can't even figure out with certainty how food affects us in our tiny 75 year life. Why is it so far fetched to question the so called science behind climate change, which consequently, has changed dramatically over billions of years. And we didn't have SUV's billions of years ago, at least I don't think so. Yet, the earth warmed dramatically to get out of an ice age. Actually, to get out of 5 known ice ages. Noticing and up and down pattern?
Climate would change significantly even if the human race didn't exist. We didn't exist each of the 5 times the earth went through an ice age and warmed out of one.
News alert! Climate changes!!!