bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
No. Both of those clauses are being abused. I like that you pointed them out to me though.
I don’t see how interstate commerce applies to drug policy, police, firefighters, or really anything else. Besides interstate commerce.
Well the problem is that we are set up as a nation so that the Supreme Court determines whether or not laws are constitutional or not and not your opinion on the matter.

And yes. That’s constitutional.
 

El Correcto

god is dead
Well the problem is that we are set up as a nation so that the Supreme Court determines whether or not laws are constitutional or not and not your opinion on the matter.

And yes. That’s constitutional.
It might be made legal, but I don’t think it’s constitutional.
 

El Correcto

god is dead
Probably was made legal, challenged and found to be constitutional.
I’d disagree. Supreme courts are made up of people like every other branch of government. People are fallible and make bad decisions based on the time they live in. We live in a post constitutional regime. It’s no longer about what is constitutional, it’s about centralizing our federal government. It’s going to get to a point where it doesn’t even matter what state you live in. It’ll be a formality if we consider those two clauses to give federal government scope on anything they please.
 

Non sequitur

Well-Known Member
The entertainment industry most definitely echoes strange ideas to the young and impressionable. I found these lyrics by imagine dragon suspicious:
Just a young gun with a quick fuse
I was uptight, wanna let loose
I was dreaming of bigger things
And wanna leave my own life behind
Not a yes sir, not a follower
Fit the box, fit the mold
Have a seat in the foyer, take a number
I was lightning before the thunder
Thunder, thunder
Thunder, thun', thunder
Thun-thun-thunder, thunder, thunder
Thunder, thun', thunder
Thun-thun-thunder, thunder
Thunder, feel the thunder
Lightning and the thunder
Thunder, feel the thunder
Lightning and the thunder
Thunder, thunder
Thunder
Kids were laughing in my classes
While I was scheming for the masses
Who do you think you are?
Dreaming 'bout being a big star
They say you're basic, they say you're easy
You're always riding in the back seat
Now I'm smiling from the stage while
You were clapping in the nose bleeds

And I like this song. More things to worry about then some nut yelling Allah akbar.
 

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
The entertainment industry most definitely echoes strange ideas to the young and impressionable. I found these lyrics by imagine dragon suspicious:
Just a young gun with a quick fuse
I was uptight, wanna let loose
I was dreaming of bigger things
And wanna leave my own life behind
Not a yes sir, not a follower
Fit the box, fit the mold
Have a seat in the foyer, take a number
I was lightning before the thunder
Thunder, thunder
Thunder, thun', thunder
Thun-thun-thunder, thunder, thunder
Thunder, thun', thunder
Thun-thun-thunder, thunder
Thunder, feel the thunder
Lightning and the thunder
Thunder, feel the thunder
Lightning and the thunder
Thunder, thunder
Thunder
Kids were laughing in my classes
While I was scheming for the masses
Who do you think you are?
Dreaming 'bout being a big star
They say you're basic, they say you're easy
You're always riding in the back seat
Now I'm smiling from the stage while
You were clapping in the nose bleeds

And I like this song. More things to worry about then some nut yelling Allah akbar.
better put on your pumped up kicks and run.
big deal.
people have been complaining for decades trying to blame it on music and tv and video games. it's bs. crazies gonna crazy.
 

Catatonic

Nine Lives
It’s even possible that Madison strongly disagrees with what the Federal government has become. Well, he’s dead and the “consent of the governed” today is what it is and they (we) determine through a representative republic what “necessary and proper” is.
“consent of the governed” - not in the Constitution

This is in the Constitution and allows Congress (not the SCOTUS) the power to make new laws implied in the Constitution (and Amendments).
The Necessary and Proper Clause allows Congress "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for
carrying into execution the [enumerated] Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States,or in any Department or Officer thereof." (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18). It is also sometimes called the "elastic clause." It grants Congress the powers that are implied in the Constitution, but that are not explicitly stated. That is why the powers derived from the Necessary and Proper Clause are referred to as implied powers.
 
Last edited:

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
maybe if people weren't so busy stroking off into the constitution they'd realize it's written on paper not stone. it's vague on purpose people, open to interpretation and change, by design. seriously, some people act like it's the bible for a country of snake handlers lol.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
Regretfully, it is not in the Constitution which is the LAW of the USA.

PS - I already googled it and read your link and 2 others.
It is something I believe in but is not a legal premise.
You are arguing what the founders intended and I am arguing what has come to be and the Supreme Court has (as is its constitutional right) declared to be constitutional.

The Founders are dead. For good or for ill the future remains for today’s citizens to mold.
 

tourists24

Well-Known Member
You are arguing what the founders intended and I am arguing what has come to be and the Supreme Court has (as is its constitutional right) declared to be constitutional.

The Founders are dead. For good or for ill the future remains for today’s citizens to mold.
Not as long as there are more “snake handler” originalist believers in constitutionality instead of the ones who think the meaning changes to fit the way they want it read. You may end up correct though when all is said and done by the way our court judges are nowadays
 

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
Not as long as there are more “snake handler” originalist believers in constitutionality instead of the ones who think the meaning changes to fit the way they want it read. You may end up correct though when all is said and done by the way our court judges are nowadays
The meaning has changed, many times. For better and worse. You're just arguing that your meaning is the same as someone who has been dead for 200 years and can't say otherwise. Seems presumptuous.
 

El Correcto

god is dead
You are arguing what the founders intended and I am arguing what has come to be and the Supreme Court has (as is its constitutional right) declared to be constitutional.

The Founders are dead. For good or for ill the future remains for today’s citizens to mold.
I notice you don’t answer, where do you think federal power ends and state power begins. The will of the governed can be expressed through state legislation. When the will of the governed in New York and California is being forced on Texas and Florida it’s called tyranny.
 
Top