tourists24
Well-Known Member
no no.... we just need more gun laws and more gun free zones so the only ones that have guns are the bad guys
guns
- Thread starter moreluck
- Start date
Homicide rates by firearm per 100,000 inhabitants.
List of countries by firearm-related homicide rates - Wikipedia
looks like youre in good company with a bunch of latin american countries.
tourists24
Well-Known Member
and??? I own several firearms and have never killed anyone. But I sure love the fact that if anyone comes into my house with bad intentions I stand a fighting chance of messing up their plansView attachment 520830
Homicide rates by firearm per 100,000 inhabitants.
21th worst country.List of countries by firearm-related homicide rates - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
looks like youre in good company with a bunch of latin american countries.
wheres canada on this list?
would jesus kill a home invader?
btw i seem to support your right of owning guns for defense of home invaders
And if you look at murder rate per 100,000 for all countries using all means, not just guns, the U.S. is ranked 89th out of 230. And if you take away our ten cities with the highest murder rates the U.S. is much safer than much of the world. And if you live in one of our high murder rate cities it would be wise to own a gun of your own to protect yourself and your family.View attachment 520830
Homicide rates by firearm per 100,000 inhabitants.
21th worst country.List of countries by firearm-related homicide rates - Wikipedia
looks like youre in good company with a bunch of latin american countries.
serbia is #5 for gun ownership and 39th for murder rate
america is #1 for gun ownership and 21st for murder rate
montenegro is #5 " and 30th for "
canada is 7 and 34
uruguay is 8 and 17
cyprus is 9 and 42
The U.S. is 21st for murder with guns. It's overall homicide rate places it at 89th. People use more than guns to kill others. People get stabbed, beaten, strangled, thrown off buildings or out of windows, poisoned, hanged, bombed, burned, run over with cars.
rod
Retired 23 years
Imagine what it would be if those gang bangers could actually hit anything.View attachment 520830
Homicide rates by firearm per 100,000 inhabitants.
21th worst country.List of countries by firearm-related homicide rates - Wikipedia
looks like youre in good company with a bunch of latin american countries.
sailfish
Master of Karate and Friendship for Everyone
Or at least just use the gun first.
Lineandinitial
Legio patria nostra
Canada is filled with murderers…
Babagounj
Strength through joy
This picture is misleading since a majority of Canadians live along the US' northern border and the rest of it's land mass is basically empty space.
How is this misleading and wat does it have to do with land?
Babagounj
Strength through joy
Entrapment
In the infamous anti-civil rights law, Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024, the legislature in its finite wisdom mandated the serialization and registration of modern firearms possessed in Massachusetts. There are some exemptions for antiques and pre-1968 pieces, etc.
On May 28, 2024, the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security (EOPSS) held a public hearing on the proposed regulations concerning the new registration and serialization mandates. Setting aside the Constitutional issues and other concerns about data being released intentionally or otherwise, there are serious other legal issues.
In the proposed regulations for serialization it states:
“Issuance of a serial number by DCJIS does not constitute a determination of the legality of any firearm under state or federal law.”
Excuse us, what? The Massachusetts administration under Governor Maura Healey has just announced that it is going to allow the serialization, and presumably registration, of illegal firearms.
How is it possible that our government make these mandates but not have within the system a warning or inability to proceed if the firearm is illegal to possess within the Commonwealth.
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Sounds like the Supreme’s will be looking into this.Entrapment
www.goal.org
In the infamous anti-civil rights law, Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024, the legislature in its finite wisdom mandated the serialization and registration of modern firearms possessed in Massachusetts. There are some exemptions for antiques and pre-1968 pieces, etc.
On May 28, 2024, the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security (EOPSS) held a public hearing on the proposed regulations concerning the new registration and serialization mandates. Setting aside the Constitutional issues and other concerns about data being released intentionally or otherwise, there are serious other legal issues.
In the proposed regulations for serialization it states:
“Issuance of a serial number by DCJIS does not constitute a determination of the legality of any firearm under state or federal law.”
Excuse us, what? The Massachusetts administration under Governor Maura Healey has just announced that it is going to allow the serialization, and presumably registration, of illegal firearms.
How is it possible that our government make these mandates but not have within the system a warning or inability to proceed if the firearm is illegal to possess within the Commonwealth.
Diana Ross to the rescue!
rod
Retired 23 years
Diana Ross was /is (what ever fits) a puke.
Similar threads
