Immigration

realbrown1

Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Does the military have more rights than any other citizen? So in your opinion an elderly person or disabled person who cannot make it to a poll physically has no right to vote?
There are always volunteers that are willing to help seniors get to the polls.

But you don't know about military service, since you never felt the need to serve your nation as I have done. So I don't think you get to speak on what rights or privileges they will get.
 

MAKAVELI

Well-Known Member
There are always volunteers that are willing to help seniors get to the polls.

But you don't know about military service, since you never felt the need to serve your nation as I have done. So I don't think you get to speak on what rights or privileges they will get.
You didn't answer my questions. While I have the utmost respect for anyone who serves our country, I do not believe they have any more or less rights to vote. I also believe anyone who cannot physically make it to the polls should be stripped of their right to vote. Everyone who has registered to vote has shown proof of eligibility and that is all that should be required. There is no system which would be fair to every citizen yet eliminate any chance of fraud completely. Maybe republicans should try earning the votes instead of trying to take away the rights of many.
 

realbrown1

Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
You didn't answer my questions. While I have the utmost respect for anyone who serves our country, I do not believe they have any more or less rights to vote. I also believe anyone who cannot physically make it to the polls should be stripped of their right to vote. Everyone who has registered to vote has shown proof of eligibility and that is all that should be required. There is no system which would be fair to every citizen yet eliminate any chance of fraud completely. Maybe republicans should try earning the votes instead of trying to take away the rights of many.
I would give military personnel the privilege of absentee voting.
No one else would get that privilege.
Figures that you wouldn't give our military, the people willing to fight and die for us, any extra rights or privileges. IT'S BECAUSE LIKE MOST LIBERAL DEMOCRATS, YOU HATE OUR MILITARY.
 

MAKAVELI

Well-Known Member
I would give military personnel the privilege of absentee voting.
No one else would get that privilege.
Figures that you wouldn't give our military, the people willing to fight and die for us, any extra rights or privileges. IT'S BECAUSE LIKE MOST LIBERAL DEMOCRATS, YOU HATE OUR MILITARY.
Voting is a right, not a privilege. Those who serve, do so because they want to, not to have extra rights that civilians don't.
 

upschuck

Well-Known Member
You didn't answer my questions. While I have the utmost respect for anyone who serves our country, I do not believe they have any more or less rights to vote. I also believe anyone who cannot physically make it to the polls should be stripped of their right to vote. Everyone who has registered to vote has shown proof of eligibility and that is all that should be required. There is no system which would be fair to every citizen yet eliminate any chance of fraud completely. Maybe republicans should try earning the votes instead of trying to take away the rights of many.
How is having them prove they did register(showing ID), taking away their right? Got to show ID for a lot of lesser things.
 

ch317273

When your bank says no, champion says YES
How is having them prove they did register(showing ID), taking away their right? Got to show ID for a lot of lesser things.
Yeah I agree with chuck here having to show valid id to vote should be a no brainer and anyone that had an issue with providing a valid id I would look at slightly skeptical as to why they'd have an issue with this procedure, and I disagree with the insinuation that republicans aren't earning voters, on the contrary it's the democrats who have successfully brainwashed most "uneducated " voters (I.e. Many lower income voters and people who rely on government to live) to simply vote democrat no matter who the candidate is, and I've watched as the dems continue to spew bogus propaganda to immigrants and minorities that the dems are the party who will look out for them when in actuality it's the exact opposite, the dems don't do squat for immigrants but keep them under their control, immigrants aren't viewed by dems as people but simply as votes, if u wanna laugh go google videos of some uneducated voters voting democrat at the polls, reporters ask them questions like who is the Vice President? Who is Nancy pelosi? Who was bushs vp? And they don't even know!!!! They just know how to find the democrat ballot box! It's insane!!!!they vote and don't even know who the heck they're voting for or what the candidates stand for! Nuts!
 

ch317273

When your bank says no, champion says YES
Everybody has a ID. Not having to provide it to vote invites fruad and undermines our whole system.
Yes! Absolutely right! My goodness how anyone in their right mind cannot agree with this is mind blowing, but sadly the reality of the situation in the country at this moment in time, truly sad , another fine example of the retardation epidemic sweeping the nation
 

ch317273

When your bank says no, champion says YES
U don't got an id, can't prove citizenship , get off the voting line, plain and simple and anyone who is offended by this or has issue with providing a valid Id to vote should be thrown in gitmo and water boarded just for being a :censored2:
 

ImWaitingForTheDay

Annoy a conservative....Think for yourself
You are correct. I forgot about illegal aliens and minors.

But they can't vote anyways, so it's all good.
According to Wisconsin Republican Gov. Koch-Roach Scott Walker is claiming that he voted for Ronald Reagan, but this is impossible because Walker wasn’t old enough to vote in 1980 or 1984.The problem is that Koch-Roach Scott Walker was 13 years old in 1980, and 17 years old in 1984. The legal voting age is 18. There is no way that KOCH-ROACH Scott Walker could have legally voted for Ronald Reagan unless he committed voter fraud. This is another example of why KOCH-ROACH Scott Walker could be a formidable 2016 candidate for the Republican presidential nomination. The man will lie about anything. He has no conscience when it comes to lying...
 

oldngray

nowhere special
According to Wisconsin Republican Gov. Koch-Roach Scott Walker is claiming that he voted for Ronald Reagan, but this is impossible because Walker wasn’t old enough to vote in 1980 or 1984.The problem is that Koch-Roach Scott Walker was 13 years old in 1980, and 17 years old in 1984. The legal voting age is 18. There is no way that KOCH-ROACH Scott Walker could have legally voted for Ronald Reagan unless he committed voter fraud. This is another example of why KOCH-ROACH Scott Walker could be a formidable 2016 candidate for the Republican presidential nomination. The man will lie about anything. He has no conscience when it comes to lying...
No, Scott Walker didn’t say he voted for Reagan
 

ImWaitingForTheDay

Annoy a conservative....Think for yourself
No, Scott Walker didn’t say he voted for Reagan
Update: John Hawkins, the "Right Wing News" editor who published the interview in question with Scott Walker, is now saying he reported Walker's statement incorrectly because of an error by his transcriptionist. He now claims that Walker said, "A vote for Ronald Reagan meant limited government, you know, smaller government, lower taxes..." and included a short video clip that begins with the quote, somewhat truncated.

"[A]n excerpt from that interview which seemed insignificant at the time that has gotten a lot of attention from liberal blogs today," Hawkins wrote, by way of explaining why he was double-checking the tape of his already-published interview with the governor just now.

It's impossible to tell what was said before that point in the audio clip and weird that Hawkins omitted it. His original transcript and story remain uncorrected. The Walker administration never offered any comment, not even to say that the governor had been misquoted.
 

oldngray

nowhere special
Update: John Hawkins, the "Right Wing News" editor who published the interview in question with Scott Walker, is now saying he reported Walker's statement incorrectly because of an error by his transcriptionist. He now claims that Walker said, "A vote for Ronald Reagan meant limited government, you know, smaller government, lower taxes..." and included a short video clip that begins with the quote, somewhat truncated.

"[A]n excerpt from that interview which seemed insignificant at the time that has gotten a lot of attention from liberal blogs today," Hawkins wrote, by way of explaining why he was double-checking the tape of his already-published interview with the governor just now.

It's impossible to tell what was said before that point in the audio clip and weird that Hawkins omitted it. His original transcript and story remain uncorrected. The Walker administration never offered any comment, not even to say that the governor had been misquoted.

You just don't want to admit the truth and continue to repeat lies.
 

ch317273

When your bank says no, champion says YES
You just don't want to admit the truth and continue to repeat lies.
classic dem/liberal approach to anything, smokescreen with irrelevant details while speaking nothing of the truth or actual viable solutions to anything, while promising the world on a platter to everyone, "free o'charge" as the irish say
 

ImWaitingForTheDay

Annoy a conservative....Think for yourself
You just don't want to admit the truth and continue to repeat lies.
Pathological liars create more lies to verify their previous lies.Now remember. Its not a lie if you believe it. Which leads us to the mental health issue. Pathological psychosis.Koch-Roach walker lied.
In other news, the sun rose.
 

ch317273

When your bank says no, champion says YES
i think its time for a lil classic liberal democrat of the week winner....
image.jpg
re-elected after all the scandal, hero of the people, put in office by the people, and always acting FOR the people....coulda been a ham sandwich on the ballot and if it was on the democrat line on the ballot the sandwich woulda been mayor of DC
 

ImWaitingForTheDay

Annoy a conservative....Think for yourself
You are such a loyal Gruberite.
So Oldycan't tell reality from fantasy. What else is new?No one cares (oldy,CH3187876640983465213) because they have no distinction between truth and lies or fiction and non-fiction or real or made up or right and wrong. Facts and truth are totally irrelevant .
 

oldngray

nowhere special
So Oldycan't tell reality from fantasy. What else is new?No one cares (oldy,CH3187876640983465213) because they have no distinction between truth and lies or fiction and non-fiction or real or made up or right and wrong. Facts and truth are totally irrelevant.

Exactly. You just repeated the mantra of liberals.
 

ch317273

When your bank says no, champion says YES
democrat wendy davis' attempt at the texas governors office was going great until it was revealed she lied about her life story as a struggling single mom, turns out she divorced her then husband the day after he finished paying her law school tuition, and the laundry list goes on
image.jpg
 
Top