Immigration

[MAKAVELI]

actually you're arguing semantics. I made the first post on this subject to the point that the US does not recognize dual citizenship.
in my references i also showed that the US does not do anything to anyone that has through some process acquired dual citizenship.
you folks have been trying to argue that point with semantics.

So by not requiring one to relinquish their foreign citizenship they're not recognizing dual citizenship? Got It.

 

[Fred's Myth]

So by not requiring one to relinquish their foreign citizenship they're not recognizing dual citizenship? Got It.

No, dip, by not OFFICIALLY recognizing dual citizenship, they're not recognizing dual citizenship. Allowing, and recognizing, are two distinct situations. NOW you've got it!

 

[vantexan]

No, dip, by not OFFICIALLY recognizing dual citizenship, they're not recognizing dual citizenship. Allowing, and recognizing, are two distinct situations. NOW you've got it!

What matters most to the U.S. is unless you renounce your citizenship you're on the hook for taxes no matter where you reside. There are generous exemptions for income earned overseas but above that they want their cut. Only they and one or two other countries, small ones, do this.

 

[rickyb]

americans are already overly concerned about immigration and there is no economic crisis unravelling (great recession event).

just wait till the next banking crisis, america and nazi germany might look increasingly comparable

 

[MAKAVELI]

No, dip, by not OFFICIALLY recognizing dual citizenship, they're not recognizing dual citizenship. Allowing, and recognizing, are two distinct situations. NOW you've got it!

Same difference d******. Again you cuckservatives love to argue semantics.

 

[Sportello]

Sixty percent of voters polled agreed with the president’s argument that Democrats are more interested in "exploiting the nation's immigration issue for political gain,” compared to 34 percent of respondents who said Democrats are more interested in "resolving the nation's immigration issue."

And 54% believed that tRUmp was more interested in exploiting immigration for political gain.

It was not a good survey for you tRUmp lovers.

 

[newfie]

So by not requiring one to relinquish their foreign citizenship they're not recognizing dual citizenship? Got It.

look at mak going for the consolation prize . enjoy your participaton trophy

 

[newfie]

Same difference d******. Again you cuckservatives love to argue semantics.

I have to say this was one of my easiest trolls i have executed here. I knew you cuckholsters would kill yourself to jump all over this bait

 

[newfie]

And 54% believed that tRUmp was more interested in exploiting immigration for political gain.

It was not a good survey for you tRUmp lovers.

which part? the part that said 75 percent want stronger borders?

 

[MAKAVELI]

I have to say this was one of my easiest trolls i have executed here. I knew you cuckholsters would kill yourself to jump all over this bait

Read these two paragraphs very slowly and then please quote where it says us does not recognize dual citizenship.
Dual Nationality
U.S. law does not mention dual nationality or require a person to choose one nationality or another. A U.S. citizen may naturalize in a foreign state without any risk to his or her U.S. citizenship. However, persons who acquire a foreign nationality after age 18 by applying for it may relinquish their U.S. nationality if they wish to do so. In order to relinquish U.S. nationality by virtue of naturalization as a citizen of a foreign state, the law requires that the person must apply for the foreign nationality voluntarily and with the intention to relinquish U.S. nationality. Intent may be shown by the person’s statements and conduct.

Dual nationals owe allegiance to both the United States and the foreign country. They are required to obey the laws of both countries, and either country has the right to enforce its laws. It is important to note the problems attendant to dual nationality. Claims of other countries upon U.S. dual-nationals often place them in situations where their obligations to one country are in conflict with the laws of the other. In addition, their dual nationality may hamper efforts of the U.S. Government to provide consular protection to them when they are abroad, especially when they are in the country of their second nationality.

 

[newfie]

Read these two paragraphs very slowly and then please quote where it says us does not recognize dual citizenship.
Dual Nationality
U.S. law does not mention dual nationality or require a person to choose one nationality or another. A U.S. citizen may naturalize in a foreign state without any risk to his or her U.S. citizenship. However, persons who acquire a foreign nationality after age 18 by applying for it may relinquish their U.S. nationality if they wish to do so. In order to relinquish U.S. nationality by virtue of naturalization as a citizen of a foreign state, the law requires that the person must apply for the foreign nationality voluntarily and with the intention to relinquish U.S. nationality. Intent may be shown by the person’s statements and conduct.

Dual nationals owe allegiance to both the United States and the foreign country. They are required to obey the laws of both countries, and either country has the right to enforce its laws. It is important to note the problems attendant to dual nationality. Claims of other countries upon U.S. dual-nationals often place them in situations where their obligations to one country are in conflict with the laws of the other. In addition, their dual nationality may hamper efforts of the U.S. Government to provide consular protection to them when they are abroad, especially when they are in the country of their second nationality.

you're still wrong . the US does not recognize dual citizenship . man this is the best fishing bait ever

 

[MAKAVELI]

you're still wrong . the US does not recognize dual citizenship . man this is the best fishing bait ever

Still waiting for that quote. Don't worry I'll give you a little more time.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Same difference d******. Again you cuckservatives love to argue semantics.

seems like the common person in discussing semantics is you.

 

[newfie]

Still waiting for that quote. Don't worry I'll give you a little more time.

i already listed credible sources that back up my point. how much are you paying me to find you more quotes?

 

[newfie]

seems like the common person in discussing semantics is you.

see thats what I thought . if i lead a discussion by making a point and someone comes along and argues the verbage of that argument then the johnny come lately is the semanticteer.

 

[MAKAVELI]

i already listed credible sources that back up my point. how much are you paying me to find you more quotes?

I listed the government website with the very definition of the law. What website did you list?

 

[newfie]

I listed the government website with the very definition of the law. What website did you list?

same , go back and find it. I dont repeat myself.

look at him he's still trying fight for somethin

 

[MAKAVELI]

same , go back and find it. I dont repeat myself.

look at him he's still trying fight for somethin

Yeah umum findlaw is not a government website. Try telling another big fish story. You seem to be very good at that.

 

[newfie]

Yeah umum findlaw is not a government website. Try telling another big fish story. You seem to be very good at that.

oh look maks back begging for more, 30 posts later he finally reads some of my information. god I hope we dont have to do another 30 posts before you reference the rest.

 

[BakerMayfield2018]

oh look maks back begging for more, 30 posts later he finally reads some of my information. god I hope we dont have to do another 30 posts before you reference the rest.

Hi is riding a high. Lakers got LeBron now he can’t control himself