Immigration

Turdferguson

Just a turd
Sadly, you think this is applicable. SMH
No , I think it is how he would think.. Because no one has ever built a tunnel in the history of the world to get under a wall. A wall is a stupid idea. If you want to monitor it build border outpost with drones to patrol. Anything about a wall is just political BS to appeal to his base
 

Fred's Myth

Nonhyphenated American
No , I think it is how he would think.. Because no one has ever built a tunnel in the history of the world to get under a wall. A wall is a stupid idea. If you want to monitor it build border outpost with drones to patrol. Anything about a wall is just political BS to appeal to his base
Drones would only be useful if they were armed. Are we ready to go there?
 

Fred's Myth

Nonhyphenated American
I would be all in for drones to take out all the business owners that hire the undocumented. If you don't hire them they won't come.
Cheaper than a wall too.
If it works for 'undocumented immigrants', then we could expand the concept to drug users, and maybe win the war on drugs.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
@It will be fine getting this discussion back on the immigration page and off the abortion page here are the percent of no show decisions rendered per politifact . still looking for your 99 percent number king makeitupita

so per politifact a heavily biased liberal source as many as 43 percent of all cases did not show up for their scheduled court cases in fy15. the best argument you can make is that "most" showed up

XHm0KYaHL3MYiNetgaGUyB_uBrzwl81IDIsn3DKLaFgvaR0S82kMmqL9yXG6Ds-GJZkzfoOs2jn7avcOxOHd9MQ800XDA0Nz43cOdvGY40C5CMrBfiRT86q0TECGhhufwMTmVjs5
 

It will be fine

Well-Known Member
@It will be fine getting this discussion back on the immigration page and off the abortion page here are the percent of no show decisions rendered per politifact . still looking for your 99 percent number king makeitupita

so per politifact a heavily biased liberal source as many as 43 percent of all cases did not show up for their scheduled court cases in fy15. the best argument you can make is that "most" showed up

XHm0KYaHL3MYiNetgaGUyB_uBrzwl81IDIsn3DKLaFgvaR0S82kMmqL9yXG6Ds-GJZkzfoOs2jn7avcOxOHd9MQ800XDA0Nz43cOdvGY40C5CMrBfiRT86q0TECGhhufwMTmVjs5
For the love of Pete, keep up.
ICE Shuts Down Program for Asylum-Seekers - The Atlantic

There are better cheaper alternatives to child abuse that produce better results to boot.

“Since January 2016, the program has served asylum-seekers in numerous cities across the U.S., including Chicago, Miami, New York, Los Angeles, Baltimore, and Washington, D.C. According to a letter signed by Ann Schlarb, the senior vice president of The GEO Group—the prison company that runs the case management program—99 percent of the program’s participants “successfully attended their court appearances and ICE check-ins.” Schlarb even noted that “families have thrived” under the relaxed conditions.”
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
For the love of Pete, keep up.
ICE Shuts Down Program for Asylum-Seekers - The Atlantic

There are better cheaper alternatives to child abuse that produce better results to boot.

“Since January 2016, the program has served asylum-seekers in numerous cities across the U.S., including Chicago, Miami, New York, Los Angeles, Baltimore, and Washington, D.C. According to a letter signed by Ann Schlarb, the senior vice president of The GEO Group—the prison company that runs the case management program—99 percent of the program’s participants “successfully attended their court appearances and ICE check-ins.” Schlarb even noted that “families have thrived” under the relaxed conditions.”

your example sampled 600 examples my sampling hundreds of thousands.
 

It will be fine

Well-Known Member
your example sampled 600 examples my sampling hundreds of thousands.
That’s because it was a pilot program. Well run organizations will run pilot programs and expand the successful ones. This one was successful and Trump shut it down, he said it was too humane and too cost effective.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
That’s because it was a pilot program. Well run organizations will run pilot programs and expand the successful ones. This one was successful and Trump shut it down, he said it was too humane and too cost effective.

pilot programs run in small samplings with low risk asylum seekers that you then presented as an overall result.
 
Top