I guess people dying by the tens of thousands is no big deal to you, huh?LMFAO.
Little scaredy cat.
Kek
I guess people dying by the tens of thousands is no big deal to you, huh?LMFAO.
Little scaredy cat.
Kek
Casualties...I guess people dying by the tens of thousands is no big deal to you, huh?
I'm 100% for it. If the citizens vote in the majority to make some drugs legal so be it. Should still try to keep the hard stuff out.Casualties...
I've always been against the the drug war.
How bout you?
K.I'm 100% for it. If the citizens vote in the majority to make some drugs legal so be it. Should still try to keep the hard stuff out.
Sanctuary city policies in San Francisco kept an illegal immigrant who'd already been deported numerous times from being handed over to ICE. He went on to kill Kate Steinle. That's the kind of garbage I'm referring to. As for a wall being expensive, how many trillions have been spent in the war on poverty? Do you think the poverty rate will get better letting in millions of uneducated, nonEnglish speaking migrants? The money we spend on them annually is much more than the one time cost of the wall. It's not about caring for the poor, it's about future Democrat votes. Period.
Exactly!K.
Well if you support the drug war you support the problems that come with prohibition so stop bitching.
I think your estimate is way too low ... the war on drug usage has killed millions of innocent people in the way of the criminals and the enforcement personnel.I guess people dying by the tens of thousands is no big deal to you, huh?
This is the reason I rarely engage some people ... some people’s expressed views are so evil and ignorant, I just let the black wave take them over.Wrong, wrong, and super-wrong.
Trifecta!
so you support states making drugs legal?I'm 100% for it. If the citizens vote in the majority to make some drugs legal so be it. Should still try to keep the hard stuff out.
Don't support it but we live in a majority rule country unless the Supreme Court strikes it down.so you support states making drugs legal?
It appears that way since there is no actual means for people to vote for anything at the US National government level.
Was talking about fentanyl but your point is valid.I think your estimate is way too low ... the war on drug usage has killed millions of innocent people in the way of the criminals and the enforcement personnel.
People who are for the war on drugs are bereft of compassion and have no soul ... they be going straight to hell.
I'm glad you're admitting you're wrong! About time!Wrong, wrong, and super-wrong.
Trifecta!
No we don’t!Don't support it but we live in a majority rule country unless the Supreme Court strikes it down.
Where in the world did you get 700 million?No we don’t!
We live in the USA which is a representative democracy.
Citizens do not vote on laws ... they vote on representatives who then make the laws.
When less than 1000 people make the laws for 700 million citizens, it is not a majority rules.
2130 census.Where in the world did you get 700 million?
You're ahead of your time.2130 census.
Supreme Court is majority rules. And if candidate gets majority of electoral votes he gets hopefully to put at least one justice on the court who will vote his viewpoint and his constituents who put him there.No we don’t!
We live in the USA which is a representative democracy.
Citizens do not vote on laws ... they vote on representatives who then make the laws.
When less than 1000 people make the laws for 700 million citizens, it is not a majority rules.
Heck yaput at least one justice on the court who will vote his viewpoint .
That’s easily the worst judicial philosophy I’ve ever heard.Supreme Court is majority rules. And if candidate gets majority of electoral votes he gets hopefully to put at least one justice on the court who will vote his viewpoint and his constituents who put him there.
Except for your everything is fine as long as they vote how I want philosophy.That’s easily the worst judicial philosophy I’ve ever heard.