Impeachment Trial of The Don

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
butcher the character and reputations of career military and diplomats such as Taylor, Yovanovitch Vindman and Fiona Hill that's not going to bode well for Republicans in swing states.
Lol, you think anyone knows who those people are? You live in a liberal news bubble.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
Yovanovitch....state department officials who have faithfully served presidents of both parties for decades having their careers disemboweled in congress
She did not faithfully serve the president. She served a group of people and organizations who think they are the fourth branch of government.

She was crooked doing the will of corrupt people, rather than her job to serve at the pleasure of the president.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Not one of them went through the evisceration that Kavanaugh went through and you were all for that. I'd put his career before any of the folks you just mentioned and not one of them was a fact witness save the EU ambassador and he admitted Trump said no quid pro quo. You got nothing.
You talking about Sondland? The hotel guy and Trump appointee who contributed one million dollars to Trump's inaugural committee ?
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
She did not faithfully serve the president. She served a group of people and organizations who think they are the fourth branch of government.

She was crooked doing the will of corrupt people, rather than her job to serve at the pleasure of the president.
Serving at the pleasure of the president does not mean breaking the law in order to do so.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
You talking about Sondland? The hotel guy and Trump appointee who contributed one million dollars to Trump's inaugural committee ?
And the one the Press thought was implicating Trump but under cross examination he clarified that Trump didn't make any demands. You have only hearsay witnesses, no fact witnesses.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
And the one the Press thought was implicating Trump but under cross examination he clarified that Trump didn't make any demands. You have only hearsay witnesses, no fact witnesses.
He's certainly not going to say anything that could impair his ability to recoup that cool million through future business dealings with foreign interests.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
Serving at the pleasure of the president does not mean breaking the law in order to do so.
The president did not ask her to break the law.

But it is certainly questionable that under Joe Biden she was dictating lists of corrupt people that should not be looked into to the Ukrainian prosecutor.

If anyone asked her to break the law it was the former administration.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
He's certainly not going to say anything that could impair his ability to recoup that cool million through future business dealings with foreign interests.
Hmmm, when all those foreign interests were contributing millions to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary was the Secretary of State and then the presumptive winner of the presidency you didn't seem to mind. Hey Bill, Hillary, here's $500k, give us a speech!
 

BrownArmy

Well-Known Member
The president did not ask her to break the law.

But it is certainly questionable that under Joe Biden she was dictating lists of corrupt people that should not be looked into to the Ukrainian prosecutor.

If anyone asked her to break the law it was the former administration.

Fake news.

Trump fired her because she was ‘in the way’.

Which is fine, but don’t turn it into something it’s not.

It’s the equivalent of firing the guy that cleans the floors because the dispatch is screwed up.

Sure, go ahead, but don’t come up with fake reasons.

Trump can let her go, he did, end of story.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
Fake news.

Trump fired her because she was ‘in the way’.

Which is fine, but don’t turn it into something it’s not.

It’s the equivalent of firing the guy that cleans the floors because the dispatch is screwed up.

Sure, go ahead, but don’t come up with fake reasons.

Trump can let her go, he did, end of story.
I'm not making anything up, everything in my post is factual. And yes, he can fire her for any reason so it's silly that liberals acted like he couldn't.
 

BrownArmy

Well-Known Member
She did not faithfully serve the president. She served a group of people and organizations who think they are the fourth branch of government.

She was crooked doing the will of corrupt people, rather than her job to serve at the pleasure of the president.

This is your fake news.

By all means, fire the floor cleaner to hide the sins of the dispatch manager.

I feel bad that the Dems dragged her into the spotlight, she’s just an Ambassador, and a good one, by all accounts.

But she got in Rudy’s way, soooo
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
This is your fake news.

By all means, fire the floor cleaner to hide the sins of the dispatch manager.

I feel bad that the Dems dragged her into the spotlight, she’s just an Ambassador, and a good one, by all accounts.

But she got in Rudy’s way, soooo
It's not fake news.
It is a fact she was dictating to the Ukrainian prosecutor lists of corrupt people to not look into.

Your problem is you only follow liberal news and they have refused to look into Biden's corruption from day one.
 

BrownArmy

Well-Known Member
It's not fake news.
It is a fact she was dictating to the Ukrainian prosecutor lists of corrupt people to not look into.

Your problem is you only follow liberal news and they have refused to look into Biden's corruption from day one.

Pics, or it's fake news.

Back that sht up Brenda, or shut yer mouth

8Chan doesn't count
 
Top