El Correcto
god is dead
He resigned. What do you think would of happened van?Nixon wasn't impeached, and Trump will leave office in either a year or in 5.
He resigned. What do you think would of happened van?Nixon wasn't impeached, and Trump will leave office in either a year or in 5.
They all promise wealth and prosperity. The only problem I have with Trump's way to go about it is his incessant need to crow about his success while slamming his enemies. The man never shuts up. Sometimes it's great theater. A lot of times it's grating. But I do agree that the spending has to get under control only in today's environment the one thing that would insure his defeat is pulling back on spending. We've gotten too used to the government flowing the money and if they reduce the flow significantly people will scream like stuck pigs.I don’t want to vote for someone promising to make me wealthy. I don’t even vote for the people promising they’ll make the Christians treat me like they would anyone else or give lip service to my union job.
I vote for people I think will leave us alone and quit using the federal government as a giving tree, there to provide happiness and right all of societies wrongs.
Trump isn’t that guy and that’s why I didn’t vote for him and why I probably won’t vote for him again. I’m on and off the fence with the guy.
Doesn't matter, he wasn't impeached. But if he had been it would have been bipartisan. This impeachment is a partisan hit job and if the Dems retain the House we'll probably see more of it. Very good chance they'll lose the House though.He resigned. What do you think would of happened van?
The whole electorate?No, the electorate sees this for what it is, a sham impeachment.
The majority who'll vote for Trump.The whole electorate?
And that’s why we have elections. And maybe Ukraine and Russia won’t interfere.The majority who'll vote for Trump.
And maybe Ukraine and Russia won’t interfere.
President Trump spent his entire 2016 campaign crying “RIGGED!!!”I can already hear the gears moving in Democratic minds over which countries would be good to blame in November if an absolute turd of a Democratic candidate is nominated and loses in November.
I can already hear the gears moving in Democratic minds over which countries would be good to blame in November if an absolute turd of a Democratic candidate is nominated and loses in November.
This time there’s a backstory.President Trump spent his entire 2016 campaign crying “RIGGED!!!”
What’s good for the goose....
President Trump spent his entire 2016 campaign crying “RIGGED!!!”
What’s good for the goose....
C’mon Ox. There’s more than theory here. A lot more.If Democrats wanna beat Trump, they can do the tenacious and ruthless tough guy/girl (if those terms aren’t too offensive) thing. The base would get it. Fight fire with Fire.
But the conspiracy theory thing probably wouldn’t go down as well. Even center-left folks don’t enjoy that like more conservative religious folks who enjoy a good fairy tale do.
If Democrats wanna beat Trump, they can do the tenacious and ruthless tough guy/girl (if those terms aren’t too offensive) thing. The base would get it. Fight fire with Fire.
But the conspiracy theory thing probably wouldn’t go down as well. Even center-left folks don’t enjoy that like more conservative religious folks who enjoy a good fairy tale do.
Judge Andrew Napolitano: Trump's Senate impeachment trial -- What does it take to remove a president?C’mon Ox. There’s more than theory here. A lot more.
Judge Andrew Napolitano: Trump's Senate impeachment trial -- What does it take to remove a president?Evidence of what crime exactly? A real crime?
Napoliano covers all of that. But if you want to hold fast to your Republican talking points, that is indeed your right.“Hence, his public denunciations of his Senate trial as a charade, a joke and a hoax. His trial is not a charade or a joke or a hoax. It is deadly serious business based on well-established constitutional norms.”
If the Democrats actually considered this impeachment a deadly serious business they would have gathered more evidence against Trump in the House before sending impeachment articles to the Senate instead of trying to get the Senate/jury to gather that evidence for them.
Pretty much same as last time, no interference.And that’s why we have elections. And maybe Ukraine and Russia won’t interfere.
Yah, and Napolitano has had it out for Trump ever since Trump wouldn't nominate him for the Supreme Court.
Napoliano covers all of that. But if you want to hold fast to your Republican talking points, that is indeed your right.
Democrats didn’t have a chance at removal but only because the Senate is working with the White House to prevent it. That’s not democrats botching it.Napolitano has been slapping his salami on screen and online to the idea of Trump going down ever since both he and I thought Mueller had him on Russian collusion.
I think Trump totally did this one. But House Democrats botched it when they had their chance.