It’s about to get real here in 705!

Dracula

Package Car is cake compared to this...
My 401k won’t ever run the risk of falling below 80% funded for any reason. The people keeping these funds alive deserve to be rewarded in other ways because pension increases look to be very unlikely.

I'm not taking a side in your little feud here, but your claim that your 401k won't ever run the risk of falling below 80% is fundamentally false. Since your 401k is invested into various funds, you could lose far more than 80%. If you have $500,000 in your 401k and your investments lost 50% in a market crash, you're at $250,000.

Do the math, Brother.

These 401k's have been sold as some sort of panacea to us by financial wizards, under the guise that the stock market, historically, returns a yearly average yield somewhere around 7%. Until it doesn't. Like, say, 2008. I don't know about you, but I lost almost 30% of my 401k balance in 2008.

Good thing I didn't retire that year.

401k's sound great, until you factor in fees, market fluctuations and their main purpose, to put the risk on the employee, instead of the employer.
 

Poop Head

Judge me.
I wouldn’t trust anything a feeder driver says....they gossip 100x worse than a bunch of old ladies at del Boca vista retirement community
you-think-you-can-keep-us-out-of-del-boca-vista.jpg
 

Feederquacker

Well-Known Member
.[/QUOTE]
I wouldn’t trust anything a feeder driver says....they gossip 100x worse than a bunch of old ladies at del Boca vista retirement community[/QUOTE]


I generally don’t trust most of what anyone in this company or Union says. Most everyone is full of :censored2: and talking out their :censored2:. Just take a look around here. On just about every thread you will find more than a few explanations of how whatever it is is supposed to be. Most people don’t have a dang clue what they’re talking about. The Company will lie to you, the Union will blow smoke up your arse and the members just make it worse.

You think I have a tad bit of cynicism?
 

burrheadd

KING Of GIFS
I wouldn’t trust anything a feeder driver says....they gossip 100x worse than a bunch of old ladies at del Boca vista retirement community[/QUOTE]


I generally don’t trust most of what anyone in this company or Union says. Most everyone is full of :censored2: and talking out their :censored2:. Just take a look around here. On just about every thread you will find more than a few explanations of how whatever it is is supposed to be. Most people don’t have a dang clue what they’re talking about. The Company will lie to you, the Union will blow smoke up your arse and the members just make it worse.

You think I have a tad bit of cynicism?[/QUOTE]

Not true the FNN is more reliable than CNN
 

710 steward

Well-Known Member
I'm not taking a side in your little feud here, but your claim that your 401k won't ever run the risk of falling below 80% is fundamentally false. Since your 401k is invested into various funds, you could lose far more than 80%. If you have $500,000 in your 401k and your investments lost 50% in a market crash, you're at $250,000.

Do the math, Brother.

These 401k's have been sold as some sort of panacea to us by financial wizards, under the guise that the stock market, historically, returns a yearly average yield somewhere around 7%. Until it doesn't. Like, say, 2008. I don't know about you, but I lost almost 30% of my 401k balance in 2008.

Good thing I didn't retire that year.

401k's sound great, until you factor in fees, market fluctuations and their main purpose, to put the risk on the employee, instead of the employer.


I have made all of my losses up and MORE than doubled my balance since then. I’m not sure if you realize this but $200 a week in a 401k without ever increasing the $200 is a tick under 700 grand at 5% interest compounded for 30 years. You could draw 4 grand a month out it for 25 years before it ran out of money. You keep your pension. I’ll gladly take the 700 grand and if I die it can be passed on to my loved ones.
 

Waldo

Well-Known Member
I generally don’t trust most of what anyone in this company or Union says. Most everyone is full of :censored2: and talking out their :censored2:. Just take a look around here. On just about every thread you will find more than a few explanations of how whatever it is is supposed to be. Most people don’t have a dang clue what they’re talking about. The Company will lie to you, the Union will blow smoke up your arse and the members just make it worse.

You think I have a tad bit of cynicism?

...but I really do have the hardest pull in the building.
 

ColdHarvest

Well-Known Member
I don't know what crap hole you all work in, but our feeder drivers are legit dudes. I've seen them help local sort load irregs, and they are always in a good mood and happy AF.
 

Dracula

Package Car is cake compared to this...
I have made all of my losses up and MORE than doubled my balance since then. I’m not sure if you realize this but $200 a week in a 401k without ever increasing the $200 is a tick under 700 grand at 5% interest compounded for 30 years. You could draw 4 grand a month out it for 25 years before it ran out of money. You keep your pension. I’ll gladly take the 700 grand and if I die it can be passed on to my loved ones.

Well, hopefully you will average a 5% return every year.
 

dudebro

Well-Known Member
I'm not taking a side in your little feud here, but your claim that your 401k won't ever run the risk of falling below 80% is fundamentally false. Since your 401k is invested into various funds, you could lose far more than 80%. If you have $500,000 in your 401k and your investments lost 50% in a market crash, you're at $250,000.

Do the math, Brother.

These 401k's have been sold as some sort of panacea to us by financial wizards, under the guise that the stock market, historically, returns a yearly average yield somewhere around 7%. Until it doesn't. Like, say, 2008. I don't know about you, but I lost almost 30% of my 401k balance in 2008.

Good thing I didn't retire that year.

401k's sound great, until you factor in fees, market fluctuations and their main purpose, to put the risk on the employee, instead of the employer.

It still returns 7%. Even if you'd retired in 2008, you wouldn't withdraw ALL the money. The market was back to 2007 level in 2009, and since 2003, counting the correction, it has averaged 11.25%.

Also, what makes you think a defined benefit pension plan puts the risk on the employer in the event of a correction? Ask the people who've had their pensions reduced how that works out.
 

Inthegame

Well-Known Member
It still returns 7%. Even if you'd retired in 2008, you wouldn't withdraw ALL the money. The market was back to 2007 level in 2009, and since 2003, counting the correction, it has averaged 11.25%.
The DJIA hit just over 14000 in 2007 and didn't return there until 2013.
Also, what makes you think a defined benefit pension plan puts the risk on the employer in the event of a correction? Ask the people who've had their pensions reduced how that works out.
Participating employers withdrawal/unfunded liability increases as the funding pct decreases.
 

dudebro

Well-Known Member
The DJIA hit just over 14000 in 2007 and didn't return there until 2013.
Participating employers withdrawal/unfunded liability increases as the funding pct decreases.

Don't forget the fact that if you were working and contributing to the market between 2009 and 2014, you bought at 6700 and less than 5 years later that money DOUBLED. So, you can point to 2008 as if the market always does that, it doesn't. I could sit here and point to 2009, and it doesn't always go UP 30% either.

On average, you get the 7%. And for what you pay in, a 401k on the worst day of the market is more money back than the defined benefit plans.
 

BuckyBadger

Well-Known Member
Don't hijack this thread. Obviously 705 members think they may be striking, and this is what this thread is about and the connection to 710.
 
Top