1989
Well-Known Member
Maybe you should not have a say in other peoples future. If not for the pay, you would be fine with it?
July 10th contract teleforum call
- Thread starter brown_trousers
- Start date
Bubblehead
My Senior Picture
No, it's just semantics.
They know what they have agreed to...and we don't and that's a problem for me.
F
Frankie's Friend
Guest
Dude, last time two whole regions voted to impose teamcare on us and they themselves didnt get it.
Some locals got the cba imposed on them when they voted no three times.
Do you have to be a problem child on here every day?
Last edited:
Yet the people they haven’t done the job in 25 years or EVER in some cases somehow are the end all knowledge base? If I want to know how to clean a toilet, I’ll call a porter. If I want to know about an engine, I’ll call a mechanic. If I want to know about delivering, I’ll call a guy that drove 25 years ago?? Nahhhh.
Rack em
Made the Podium
I just read that the company can work these 22.4s up to 14 hours a day ON ROAD and pay them less for it. No where does it say they have to perform inside work. Still voting NO
1989
Well-Known Member
Just because you haven’t seen it yet? Very little details are in the master. So wait until there is something to make an educated decision on.
Bubblehead
My Senior Picture
We deserved to know why they asked us for a strike authorization, but didn't get it.
We gave it to them anyway.
Now they have a "handshake agreement", but won't tell us what it is.
You sheep can accept that if you want, but I'm calling
....
DELACROIX
In the Spirit of Honore' Daumier
No 11: 22.4's positions will also be counted with 22.3's to fulfill the agreement in creating more full time opportunities under this contract. Will all these newly created jobs be under the classification of 22.4. Are the 22.3's inside positions also protected from morphing into 22.4?
I see that the only ones who would be interested in these jobs will be lower seniority part timers and applicants off the the street.
DirtySouth
Well-Known Member
IBT needs to give the membership that absolute minimum time possible to read the TA, discuss the TA, and figure out we have a lousy TA before they vote.
silenze
Lunch is the best part of the day
How can they have their own seniority list and be used to cover vacations and reduce overtime?
1989
Well-Known Member
Will you need to hire an attorney to read it for you?
1989
Well-Known Member
Strictly political for you then.We deserved to know why they asked us for a strike authorization, but didn't get it.
We gave it to them anyway.
Now they have a "handshake agreement", but won't tell us what it is.
You sheep can accept that if you want, but I'm calling
Rack em
Made the Podium
I believe in article 40 of the current contract it states the company can't make employees sit and wait off the clock. Now they want to do away with that too?!
Bubblehead
My Senior Picture
Ho so?
1989
Well-Known Member
We deserved to know why they asked us for a strike authorization, but didn't get it.
We gave it to them anyway.
Now they have a "handshake agreement", but won't tell us what it is.
You sheep can accept that if you want, but I'm calling
Only concerned about how you feel the process was handled.
Bubblehead
My Senior Picture
Did you ever notice how you frequently tend to be alone with your thoughts?
DELACROIX
In the Spirit of Honore' Daumier
Sorry, I responded on the quote..damn
1989
Well-Known Member
So that’s a yes, strictly political.
Similar threads
