MAKAVELI
Banned
To siphon enough volume from Express to make it profitable will be.It’s been implemented. It’s working fine. I don’t think it was terribly hard to pull off.
To siphon enough volume from Express to make it profitable will be.It’s been implemented. It’s working fine. I don’t think it was terribly hard to pull off.
It’s profitable to have express deliver the packages. The cost is even lower to give it to Ground. How do you think that results in lower profits?To siphon enough volume from Express to make it profitable will be.
I'm legitimately curious how much money the company saves by getting these packages off planes and into trailers and delivered by FXG. I've been picking up 2-3 a day during my pickups, and maybe our entire station has 50 outbound each night.
Not that Express drivers will see any of it, especially with the crazy talk of running 2 sorts and further ruining any efficiencies we can muster on road.
Deferred freight accounted for just over a million pieces of freight per day, $4.2 billion in revenue for the year, and collects just over $15 of revenue per piece.
You just fear you’re gonna lose your meaningless job. Why they keep a used diaper like you around is beyond me.What you know about the RLA exemption resembles the contents of a diaper.
Informative. I hadn’t looked up the numbers. But even on the low side, $100k a day adds up. If the actuals are 5x or 10x that, it’s huge.
I still don’t think they plan on taking care of the Express couriers. They’ve shown that already for years.
Oh, they plan on "taking care" of them alright.I still don’t think they plan on taking care of the Express couriers. They’ve shown that already for years.
Right now it's just theory. They haven't proved it's saved anything.They're shooting for much more than $100k a day and it shouldn't be too hard to accomplish once the LMO rollout is complete. In fact, $100k/day wouldn't be that much relative to the size of Express. Total Express operating expenses are $35 billion. Like you, I don't know what the target is or what the "worth it/not worth it" metric is. As of now they plan on focusing on those packages in PM areas where there's low volume and lots of driving (usually done by higher paid employees). It's a significant operational change and they expect it to yield significant results.
That said, it's not the be-all, end-all of changes. Others are coming. Richard Smith is going to be very busy over the next couple of years.
Depends on what you mean by "take care of."
What’s the difference in retail rates between 2day and Ground? They’ve saved at least that much on every package. Shipper pays $10 for 2day. Express pays Ground $7. Express pockets $3. What more proof do you need?Right now it's just theory. They haven't proved it's saved anything.
Right now it's just theory. They haven't proved it's saved anything.
What’s the difference in retail rates between 2day and Ground? They’ve saved at least that much on every package. Shipper pays $10 for 2day. Express pays Ground $7. Express pockets $3. What more proof do you need?
That hasn't been proven. When FedEx can actually show the numbers you can claim that. Until then it's just theory.What’s the difference in retail rates between 2day and Ground? They’ve saved at least that much on every package. Shipper pays $10 for 2day. Express pays Ground $7. Express pockets $3. What more proof do you need?
You just fear you’re gonna lose your meaningless job.
I don’t follow your argument. Shippers are paying for Express 2day shipments. At most Express would pay Ground retail rates to deliver it, in reality I’m sure Express gets a discount. Express keeps the difference without doing the work, mostly profit. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening.That hasn't been proven. When FedEx can actually show the numbers you can claim that. Until then it's just theory.
There's more to it than simply handing it to ground. Pu and sort by Express, pu from Express to Ground network, loss of productivity in Express routes. Not exactly a cost saving move.I don’t follow your argument. Shippers are paying for Express 2day shipments. At most Express would pay Ground retail rates to deliver it, in reality I’m sure Express gets a discount. Express keeps the difference without doing the work, mostly profit. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening.
I don’t follow your argument. Shippers are paying for Express 2day shipments. At most Express would pay Ground retail rates to deliver it, in reality I’m sure Express gets a discount. Express keeps the difference without doing the work, mostly profit. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening.
Probably will add up even more over time as couriers quit to find better paying jobs if this ultimately limits them to less than 40 hours. And older couriers might take their pension and leave, replaced by cheaper couriers. And over time they may be able to rework Express as a primarily part time workforce. A lot of scenarios possible that would result in more profits down the road.Informative. I hadn’t looked up the numbers. But even on the low side, $100k a day adds up. If the actuals are 5x or 10x that, it’s huge.
I still don’t think they plan on taking care of the Express couriers. They’ve shown that already for years.
There's more to it than simply handing it to ground. Pu and sort by Express, pu from Express to Ground network, loss of productivity in Express routes. Not exactly a cost saving move.
Are you sure about that? Much of it will still be flown as Ground can't make next day everywhere.Express turns it over at the origin ramp. They don't transport it to the respective hub, they don't unload it and sort it again at the hub, they don't transport it to the destination ramp, they don't unload it and transport it to the destination station, they don't unload it and sort it at the destination station, and they don't make the final delivery. The Express expenses are slashed by more than half.
You're overlooking a LOT.