So it sounds like you believe in science? While the person who says they believe in science is actually believing in someone’s feelings? But he’s calling you a fraud? And questioning your integrity. Also pretending you’re confused lol seems to make you right on the money.Where I've always been coming from:
Men can't be women and women can't be men.
I think I've been pretty clear about it.
So it sounds like you believe in science?
Yes, I was going to say it sounds like a religion. They just believe it by faith.Yep. There was a time when someone could ask me that question and then guess that I was a Democratic voter. That's no longer the case. Actual science has been replaced by the tenets of leftist religious views. Truly non-religious folks are now only toward the center of the political spectrum. The leftists who mock Bible thumpers are typically just as religious as they are.
I disagree survival is.Reproduction is the main drive of every living thing's existence.
What science describes the purpose of anything at all on this world? That isn’t the point of the “science”. Once you start ascribing purpose to things you are firmly outside the realm of science.So it sounds like you believe in science? While the person who says they believe in science is actually believing in someone’s feelings? But he’s calling you a fraud? And questioning your integrity. Also pretending you’re confused lol seems to make you right on the money.
So what you refuse to define without describing with purpose or design can’t be what you also refuse to describe without purpose or design?Where I've always been coming from:
Men can't be women and women can't be men.
I think I've been pretty clear about it.
Men can't be women and women can't be men.
I think I've been pretty clear about it.
So what you refuse to define without describing with purpose or design can’t be what you also refuse to describe without purpose or design?
Yeah bud you stumped me, not sure what you called me over here to discuss.
You’re trying to drag me down and beat me at a game you can play which is describing reality in your simple minded terms then declaring me wrong for not accepting them.I'm not interested in making very simple things complex and confusing. Men can't be women and women can't be men. And men shouldn't be competing in women's sports.
I just expect better arguments from someone who harasses me into having a conversation with them about something I don’t know much about which is being a transgender person.
If you’re at work right now, don’t get too caught up in the argument. Handle your business.
The annoying homo will be here after you clock out.
You don’t need a supporting argument, you just need to define your terms of what a man is and what a woman is and quit evading the original point of this argument.Why would someone need a supporting argument when they say that men can't be women and women can't be men? It's obvious reality.
Harass is too strong of a word with negative connotations, just like calling transwoman a man. I’d say you were definitely instigating this conversation though, is that more fair? Much like acknowledging trans women exist, a comfortable middle ground we can have a discussion on.And I harassed you into having a conversation about it? You apparently wanted this conversation so much that you were willing to wait here for me to continue it with you.
You don’t need a supporting argument, you just need to define your terms of what a man is and what a woman is and quit evading the original point of this argument.
What is a female.
One whose body was designed to produce ova, the large gamete in sexual reproduction.
Harass is too strong of a word with negative connotations, just like calling transwoman a man. I’d say you were definitely instigating this conversation though, is that more fair?
Yes calling trans women men is inappropriate and offensive. Go call a transwoman a man and see how they react to you.Do I need to also tell you what a male is now?
We're here to have conversations. Is there anything I've said that's offensive or inappropriate?
calling trans women men is inappropriate and offensive.
define your terms of what we are discussing, you’re declaring that trans women are men and not women, I want to know how you define these things.
A woman is an adult human female.
You used female to define woman, quit evading the question. You then talked about reproduction as a woman’s purpose, what they were “designed” for.Already done. You asked me what a female is after I defined what I woman is for you.
You used female to define woman
One whose body was designed to produce ova, the large gamete in sexual reproduction.
You then talked about reproduction as a woman’s purpose, what they were “designed” for.
I disagree vehemently with these things.
Which you shortly back tracked and refused to elaborate on just declaring yourself an atheist.What's wrong with that? I've defined what a female is for you: