Backtracked? What?
And I've been posting that I'm an atheist for at least 5 years now.
I'm just an old school atheist liberal who isn't interested in indulging the religious fantasies of either end of the political spectrum.
LGBTQ
- Thread starter moreluck
- Start date
Backtracked? What?
And I've been posting that I'm an atheist for at least 5 years now.
I'm just an old school atheist liberal who isn't interested in indulging the religious fantasies of either end of the political spectrum.
El Correcto
god is dead
Back tracked explaining to me the purpose and “design” of a woman. Don’t be a coward, speak your mind on it. Explain to me and any woman reading this the purpose of a woman and what designed them.
Brownflush would have no problem doing this, he is a man of his convictions.
Where? Is there a group that has "special" rights above and beyond their constitutional rights?
El Correcto
god is dead
White Christians to name one, especially the child molesting catholic priests to get even more specific.
Oh, trying to get me on my use of the word "design" since an argument can't actually be made to support the idea that men can be women and women can be men. Nothing about my use of the word "design" makes my point (definition of a female) any less true.
El Correcto
god is dead
Ya it absolutely does. You’re declaring designed left and right, “design” is your opinion of how biological functions of the body should be used.
That isn’t a good definition of a woman or man bud.
Let's try this again:
A woman is an adult human female
A female is one whose body was designed to produce ova, the large gamete in sexual reproduction.
The definitions of man/male work the same way.
It's quite simple.
El Correcto
god is dead
You go beyond just describing the functions, you’re stepping in to declare these functions the purpose of someone.
That is not scientific, that is your opinion, usually it’s based on “design”, a theist opinion. It just shows even with your lack of belief in god theist arguments still go through your head as sound logic.
That is not scientific, that is your opinion, usually it’s based on “design”, a theist opinion. It just shows even with your lack of belief in god theist arguments still go through your head as sound logic.
What rights do White Christians have that you don't have? Covering up things that would greatly embarrass and legally harm the Catholic Church isn't a right. It's appalling, but it's not a right. The sad truth is that people with an agenda try to protect that agenda anytime an associate acts out in a negative way. And negative can range from mouthing off to doing unspeakable acts. We're seeing all the time corrupt politicians being covered for. That's not special rights codified. That's an informal two tiered system of justice. Same for the Catholic Church or any other church that covers for their clergy.
No I'm not. They're biological realities. Not descriptions of one's purpose in life.
Biological realities are scientific. You're trying to run away from this by ascribing beliefs to me that I don't hold. An understandable fallback position.
El Correcto
god is dead
Okay now try to define these biological realities without the word design and arrive at using biological functions to define a woman.
There are women who can’t reproduce, are they designed not to? I don’t think so and I also think they are still a woman.
The whole point of biology is to fertilize an egg to propagate the species. Anything else is just one's idea of pleasure. Whether that pleasure is acceptable is the crux of the matter.
El Correcto
god is dead
Freedom to discriminate based on phony religious claims.
They have the right not to report sex offenders, do you even realize what we are talking about or do you really not realize tax free religion and not having to legally report past sex abuse crimes against minors as a problem and being a bit too much “rights” for religious freedom.
Women who can't actually reproduce still have female reproductive systems.
El Correcto
god is dead
What is a “female” reproductive system.
You still refuse to define this word without design and demeaning women’s purpose to their biological functions.
BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
Stop crying.
Perverting nature has always been around.
Since society began? Well, that makes it ooootay.
El Correcto
god is dead
But you’re also a science and fact based atheist, look even the Christians agree with you 
Well, in case you've never seen or learned about it:
Why is it demeaning? It's a description of a biological reality. It's like describing a person as generally having 2 arms and 2 legs.
I've already said it was appalling what they did. I think all those priests and any other paedophiles should be in prison. Yet I'm seeing people talk of MAP's. That's likely the next big push. Forgive them because they can't help it. Good to see you have a point that you draw a line at.
BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
Money covers a multitude of sins evidently. But, just here on the earth.