snookbunny420
Well-Known Member
we as a brotherhood should all walk, all of us.
we as a brotherhood should all walk, all of us.
well all but you ,Absolutely not.
So we all can be fired?we as a brotherhood should all walk, all of us.
really? not enough sups to drive and unload and sort and supervise.So we all can be fired?
I'm just saying. How many of those 250 drivers regret their decision they made on Feb. 26Th? Not all I'd bet, but I'd bet some do.really? not enough sups to drive and unload and sort and supervise.
You all are once again put in a hard spot. If you don't show up your done. In the same breath do you really want to help a company who may end up firing you?Maspeth driver here... and new to the forum. What are the best case and worst case scenarios for these drivers regarding a resolution? Also, I don't quite understand what the Local plans to bring to the negotiating table that they're trying to get UPS to agree to sit down to. Unless we threaten to strike again... what's going to get UPS to bargain? They're basically in a position of absolute power right now and in the process of replacing everyone. Why make it easier for them to transition? We're all just playing Russian Roulette every day we show up for work.
we as a brotherhood should all walk, all of us.
Don't think that Ron ever met Martin Davis, Michael Ansara or Alphonse "Little Al" D'Arco. And I'm pretty sure that he lived to regret the day that he met Jere Nash!Hey Ron, how are Martin Davis, Jere Nash and Michael Ansara, Rick Blaylock, Gerald Zero, Ed Burke and Alphonse "Little Al" D'Arco doing?
Sent using the conscience of Local 251
It really is a struggle they have to deal with everyday now. One way to deal with it would be if the rest of them all felt sick tomorrow. And maybe the next day.You all are once again put in a hard spot. If you don't show up your done. In the same breath do you really want to help a company who may end up firing you?
I didn't say that "UPS has no more choices but Arbitration". What I said was the decision on termination was the last decision that UPS gets to make. They do have other choices. They can sit down with Local 804 and attempt to resolve this issue. Or, they can roll the dice and proceed to arbitration. If they choose the latter, it just may be UPS that is at the "Mercy of what an Arbitrator will decide". Whatever you have decided was the correct action to take that day just doesn't matter, does it? You haven't been elected to make those difficult calls.Brown spider,
Lets see --you are not saying everything is great. After dismissal UPS has no more choices but Arbitration --open your eyes --The same can be said of the Union ----they have no decision at all --a lowly Business Agent already made it --Liam is not facing Arbitration --Correct ??
The correct action that day --was for Local 804 to file an expedited grievance on Procedure and the one dismissal ------not multiply the problem by 250 !!
You are saying that 250 Drivers and their Families are at the Mercy of what an Arbitrator will decide because of an Idiotic action by a Business Agent.
Of course UPS will just run to Arbitration even though their multi million dollar Attorneys have told them the Melville decision means they will automatically lose ??? I do not think so --and would not want to be one of the 250 !!
How do you think it will look in the court of public opinion?really? not enough sups to drive and unload and sort and supervise.
The Ibt has told local 804 that this was not a sanction strike! You better fix this on your own! Because your not gonna like what we will do!!
Will reformers be a group to give up our right to strike in 804.
And when exactly did the "Ibt" tell Local 804 that? It was good of them to copy you on that correspondence. Can you share it with us? No? Didn't think so.
The original driver was fired and walked out for allegedly changing his own start time. Even if this is true this is not stealing time. He was working. According to Reyes himself, he told his manager about a less senior driver starting before him and his manager said to start up early. It seems now the manager is denying that occurred. So they once again disregard our contract and walk this very senior driver (26 yrs), a former military man himself, for a non cardinal sin.Many are going to want to know why the original driver was fired in the first place. Apparently he was fired for dishonesty involving stealing time. Many here claim that he had a right to the grievance process, but isn't that a cardinal infraction? I have yet to hear any real proof that the company did something wrong in connection with this driver, and that would mean that the strike was, in fact, illegal, and hence a strike by all drivers would be illegal.
How many drivers would support that? I'm not sure it would be enough.
The original driver was fired and walked out for allegedly changing his own start time. Even if this is true this is not stealing time. He was working. According to Reyes himself, he told his manager about a less senior driver starting before him and his manager said to start up early. It seems now the manager is denying that occurred. So they once again disregard our contract and walk this very senior driver (26 yrs), a former military man himself, for a non cardinal sin.
According to our supplement, strikes are illegal "so long as the Company abides by the procedure prescribed for the settlement of disputes and differences and the decisions of the arbitrators as provided in this agreement."
The way I see it, UPS did not abide by that procedure. Of course, it most cases UPS gets away with it. But Liam seemed to want to make a stand on this. He knew that Dave had jumped the gun a bit in Melville. But Liam waited for them to actually walk him out on that bogus charge and he made his move. An arbitrator will see this and re-instate reyes as well as the 248 other drivers.