Local 804 Drivers Walked Out

Maspeth driver here... and new to the forum. What are the best case and worst case scenarios for these drivers regarding a resolution? Also, I don't quite understand what the Local plans to bring to the negotiating table that they're trying to get UPS to agree to sit down to. Unless we threaten to strike again... what's going to get UPS to bargain? They're basically in a position of absolute power right now and in the process of replacing everyone. Why make it easier for them to transition? We're all just playing Russian Roulette every day we show up for work.
 

Johney

Pineapple King
Maspeth driver here... and new to the forum. What are the best case and worst case scenarios for these drivers regarding a resolution? Also, I don't quite understand what the Local plans to bring to the negotiating table that they're trying to get UPS to agree to sit down to. Unless we threaten to strike again... what's going to get UPS to bargain? They're basically in a position of absolute power right now and in the process of replacing everyone. Why make it easier for them to transition? We're all just playing Russian Roulette every day we show up for work.
You all are once again put in a hard spot. If you don't show up your done. In the same breath do you really want to help a company who may end up firing you?
 

UPS Preloader

Well-Known Member
In the meantime, I hope the part timers grieve the crap out of them if they don't follow the contracts inside/outside ratio when hiring all the new drivers and grieve all instances of supervisors performing bargaining unit work.
 

'Lord Brown's bidding'

Well-Known Member
Many are going to want to know why the original driver was fired in the first place. Apparently he was fired for dishonesty involving stealing time. Many here claim that he had a right to the grievance process, but isn't that a cardinal infraction? I have yet to hear any real proof that the company did something wrong in connection with this driver, and that would mean that the strike was, in fact, illegal, and hence a strike by all drivers would be illegal.

How many drivers would support that? I'm not sure it would be enough.
 

Brown Spider

Well-Known Member
Hey Ron, how are Martin Davis, Jere Nash and Michael Ansara, Rick Blaylock, Gerald Zero, Ed Burke and Alphonse "Little Al" D'Arco doing?


Sent using the conscience of Local 251
Don't think that Ron ever met Martin Davis, Michael Ansara or Alphonse "Little Al" D'Arco. And I'm pretty sure that he lived to regret the day that he met Jere Nash!
But then again...the question is coming out of Providence, RI...home of Buddy Cianci, Stu Mundy and, last but not least, Stink219. Just gotta' tell ya' Stink, you picked one very appropriate screen name.
 

804brown

Well-Known Member
You all are once again put in a hard spot. If you don't show up your done. In the same breath do you really want to help a company who may end up firing you?
It really is a struggle they have to deal with everyday now. One way to deal with it would be if the rest of them all felt sick tomorrow. And maybe the next day.
 

Brown Spider

Well-Known Member
Brown spider,

Lets see --you are not saying everything is great. After dismissal UPS has no more choices but Arbitration --open your eyes --The same can be said of the Union ----they have no decision at all --a lowly Business Agent already made it --Liam is not facing Arbitration --Correct ??

The correct action that day --was for Local 804 to file an expedited grievance on Procedure and the one dismissal ------not multiply the problem by 250 !!

You are saying that 250 Drivers and their Families are at the Mercy of what an Arbitrator will decide because of an Idiotic action by a Business Agent.

Of course UPS will just run to Arbitration even though their multi million dollar Attorneys have told them the Melville decision means they will automatically lose ??? I do not think so --and would not want to be one of the 250 !!
I didn't say that "UPS has no more choices but Arbitration". What I said was the decision on termination was the last decision that UPS gets to make. They do have other choices. They can sit down with Local 804 and attempt to resolve this issue. Or, they can roll the dice and proceed to arbitration. If they choose the latter, it just may be UPS that is at the "Mercy of what an Arbitrator will decide". Whatever you have decided was the correct action to take that day just doesn't matter, does it? You haven't been elected to make those difficult calls.

And as far as you "would not want to be one of the 250", I'd have to agree with you on that! The Maspeth 250 showed a lot of courage. They showed that there comes a time when, after seeing countless grievances ignored by UPS and countless contract violations by UPS, there just comes a time when you have to take a stand. The Maspeth 250 took that stand. I'm sensing that, if you were there, they would have been the Maspeth 249. So much for "An injury to one is an injury to all".
 

Brown Spider

Well-Known Member
The Ibt has told local 804 that this was not a sanction strike! You better fix this on your own! Because your not gonna like what we will do!!


Will reformers be a group to give up our right to strike in 804.

And when exactly did the "Ibt" tell Local 804 that? It was good of them to copy you on that correspondence. Can you share it with us? No? Didn't think so.
 

member6045

Well-Known Member
And when exactly did the "Ibt" tell Local 804 that? It was good of them to copy you on that correspondence. Can you share it with us? No? Didn't think so.

What? You didn't get the email? Tim didn't forward it to you yet? Check your junk mail.


Will reformers be a group to give up our right to strike in 804.
 

804brown

Well-Known Member
Many are going to want to know why the original driver was fired in the first place. Apparently he was fired for dishonesty involving stealing time. Many here claim that he had a right to the grievance process, but isn't that a cardinal infraction? I have yet to hear any real proof that the company did something wrong in connection with this driver, and that would mean that the strike was, in fact, illegal, and hence a strike by all drivers would be illegal.

How many drivers would support that? I'm not sure it would be enough.
The original driver was fired and walked out for allegedly changing his own start time. Even if this is true this is not stealing time. He was working. According to Reyes himself, he told his manager about a less senior driver starting before him and his manager said to start up early. It seems now the manager is denying that occurred. So they once again disregard our contract and walk this very senior driver (26 yrs), a former military man himself, for a non cardinal sin.
According to our supplement, strikes are illegal "so long as the Company abides by the procedure prescribed for the settlement of disputes and differences and the decisions of the arbitrators as provided in this agreement."
The way I see it, UPS did not abide by that procedure. Of course, it most cases UPS gets away with it. But Liam seemed to want to make a stand on this. He knew that Dave had jumped the gun a bit in Melville. But Liam waited for them to actually walk him out on that bogus charge and he made his move. An arbitrator will see this and re-instate reyes as well as the 248 other drivers.
 

fedupups

Well-Known Member
UPS will fire all 250 eventually...what will happen in arbitration will happen...I doubt 10% of the drivers fired have enough in the savings account to wait even 3 months or so for a ruling( it took over 12 months to get 2 stewards their job back from Melville)...everyone agrees that UPS abuses the contract daily nationwide...unfortunately its their (UPS) mentality is to say grieve it because everything from the master contract to the supplement we have sux...we have given up so much in previous years and when this new supplement hits we will be given up more but that's a different thread...99% percent of drivers in Melville will never do another wildcat strike engineered by this local...the only way for a work stoppage would have to be Hoffa sanctioned and we all know that will never happen....this boards biggest cardinal sin is put 250 jobs in jeopardy for 1...and what hasn't been bought up so much is that I have heard from Dave O himself that the fired driver was a friend of this board...I wonder if Liam would have done the same thing for an anti-board member...but I hope they do figure a way for the drivers to get their jobs back asap...and I count myself lucky only to have received a 3 day suspension from the Melville wildcat and not get fired as my family and I cannot afford to lose a $90000/year job even though this company kicks u in the nuts everyday
 

'Lord Brown's bidding'

Well-Known Member
The original driver was fired and walked out for allegedly changing his own start time. Even if this is true this is not stealing time. He was working. According to Reyes himself, he told his manager about a less senior driver starting before him and his manager said to start up early. It seems now the manager is denying that occurred. So they once again disregard our contract and walk this very senior driver (26 yrs), a former military man himself, for a non cardinal sin.
According to our supplement, strikes are illegal "so long as the Company abides by the procedure prescribed for the settlement of disputes and differences and the decisions of the arbitrators as provided in this agreement."
The way I see it, UPS did not abide by that procedure. Of course, it most cases UPS gets away with it. But Liam seemed to want to make a stand on this. He knew that Dave had jumped the gun a bit in Melville. But Liam waited for them to actually walk him out on that bogus charge and he made his move. An arbitrator will see this and re-instate reyes as well as the 248 other drivers.

How is that not "dishonesty with an intent to defraud the company (I.e. take money from the company be means of the dishonest act)"? That's a cardinal infraction, rendering everything else you mention moot.

According to the earlier story, he received permission to start early one day back in January, from an on-car, not the center manager or dispatch supe. He assumed he could do it the alleged infraction day as well. That's all muddled, and would have been sorted out with the grievance procedure, but wasn't the best reason to call a strike on because of the ambiguity in it.
 
Top