newfie
Well-Known Member
you flatter yourself. Its normal for the herd to weed out the freaks within.I’d have to say I am humbled and flattered by this
you flatter yourself. Its normal for the herd to weed out the freaks within.I’d have to say I am humbled and flattered by this
We're looking at a big change in November. We're possibly seeing Roe vs. Wade reversed this month. We either work to make change through our system or we break it up getting a lot of people killed. No easy choices.I can appreciate what you’re saying but I believe you yearn for a time I fear has passed us buy. What you’re asking for is “common ground.” Which I would also like, but it’s very hard to do when you have one side Who….
Calls taking innocent life, “choice” up to the moment of conception and on-demand( and a few fruit cakes even shortly after that).
Calls People who love America and are Patriots White supremacist. white nationalist, Christian nationalists. Some of them not even white or Christian LOL.
Calls Gun confiscation, as well as charging people with pre-crime red flag laws “common sense gun laws”
Calls “personal healthcare” compulsatory medicine
Says having just a few political prisoners “really not a big deal” I guess because it’s not them.
I’m not sure where I can find common ground.
Although I would say most of these things are pushed from the top down.
What is your concern with how I spend my time?You really don't have anything better to do than to remind us to adhere to the rules?
It would be nice but I am not sure how we would accomplish this.Should we hold hands and sing "Cumbaya" too?
I’m flattered by this.you flatter yourself.
Humans in complex groups but IMO they are not herds.Its normal for the herd to weed out the freaks within.
Maybe by not acting like you’re in charge of something, you continue to complain about some imaginary people making something about you, while you are making it about you yourself. We welcome your ridiculous and childish opinions with open arms.What is your concern with how I spend my time?
That was not full purpose of that post anyway.
It would be nice but I am not sure how we would accomplish this.
Not so.Maybe by not acting like you’re in charge of something, you continue to complain about some imaginary people making something about you, while you are making it about you yourself.
Is that so? We? Are you a BC spokesperson?We welcome your ridiculous and childish opinions with open arms.
Now pull your skirt out of your face stop acting like a baby or the home monitor.
FYI you’re violating a TOS of BC. Again.
I am unaware of any theories that we came from "apes."if you believe in evolution than a question i would have would be why would the ape evolving into the human lose its fur.
Don’t break the prime directiveI am unaware of any theories that we came from "apes."
When you put "apes" in that context, it makes the theory of evolution seem less credible, and more ridiculous than it deserves.
I would suspect we lost our fur as a result of being in a temperate climate, and being in need of vitamin D.
Also, a genius among us learned to weave, and/or wear the fur of animals we scavenged or killed.
Personally, I entertain the notion that we are descended from primates that were inseminated by very horny, possibly intoxicated space aliens.
Can you imagine what a hilarious scene that would be? I can imagine the hung-over space aliens waking up, realizing what they'd done, doing a walk of shame, crawling and vomiting their way onto their ship, and leaving the scene at warp speed.
I think they visit us from time to time in order to observe us and re-affirm what an embarrassing, terrible, stupid thing they did. The infamous incident probably set a precedent for the protocol to follow when visiting the natives of other planets.
Rule #1: don't have intercourse with the natives.
That theory is no less ridiculous or incredible than plenty of stories from any text.
Okay, hombres, it's time for the great unwashed to solve the dilemma that our elected representatives are incapable of doing.
Please submit your proposal on how to:
A) Prevent mass shootings of innocent children, churchgoers, concert/theater attendees, etc., and
B) Preserve the 2nd Amendment Right of citizens to bear arms.
I ask that any criticism of any proposal be done with respect and a rational discussion of your disagreement, and your alternative solution.
Name calling is for losers.
My proposal is not a complete solution, but a starting point:
1) A Citizens Panel to determine which weapons are capable of inflicting mass casualties.
2) Requiring a 2-week classroom course and field training in the safe use of these weapons.
3) Trained instructors who are able to weed out unstable participants.
4) Prohibit the resale of these weapons.
This is my preliminary idea to address the issue, that will not satisfy anyone, but possibly work.
I would like to amend my opinion about the above solutions that I suggested as my participation in this thread.I believe in extensive background checks and thorough psychological screening of each person before a firearm purchase permit is issued.
Unfortunately I also believe that it has to be a federal standard and not in the hands of the state government.
You ignore the all too possible plausibility of your government oppressing its citizenry, even to the point of death.I would like to amend my opinion about the above solutions that I suggested as my participation in this thread.
My amendment includes my 2 above suggestions, I stand by them ad 1 suggestion this in addition:
Because of the difficulty individuals appear to have with reconciling the second amendment of the US Constitution with adequate and thorough gun regulation I firmly believe that the 2nd Amendment has outlived its intent and purpose and should be repealed. I believe this would enable a more reasonable amendment to address responsible gun ownership and protection of the innocent.
I hope you are able to welcome my opinion with open arms. Even if you don’t view it favorably.
You're not sure? Really? You?What is your concern with how I spend my time?
That was not full purpose of that post anyway.
It would be nice but I am not sure how we would accomplish this.
I would like to amend my opinion about the above solutions that I suggested as my participation in this thread.
My amendment includes my 2 above suggestions, I stand by them ad 1 suggestion this in addition:
Because of the difficulty individuals appear to have with reconciling the second amendment of the US Constitution with adequate and thorough gun regulation I firmly believe that the 2nd Amendment has outlived its intent and purpose and should be repealed. I believe this would enable a more reasonable amendment to address responsible gun ownership and protection of the innocent.
I hope you are able to welcome my opinion with open arms. Even if you don’t view it favorably.
Do you know what unalienable means?I hope you are able to welcome my opinion with open arms. Even if you don’t view it favorably.
He’s in the very small, elitist minority. There’s too many fools that believe the government will keep them safe. And what’s that plan look like? Defund and reduce police, release criminals with no bail, don’t charge them or seriously reduce their charges. Very safe.Do you know what unalienable means?
Yes.Do you know what unalienable means?
Yes.You're not sure? Really? You?
I can respect that.Every fiber of my being absolutely, vehemently disagrees with your entire opinion on this matter.
Thank You.And I mean that with all due respect.
I can see your point.Many times in the past, I have placed the source of this trend on the closures of mental health facilities, the coinciding beginning birth years of the Millennial generation, the watershed moment of Columbine, and the subsequent generations and perpetrators that followed.
We have neglected the needs of the mentally ill for so long that I do not have a viable solution other than the ugly, slippery slope of rounding up those with documented, inheritable mental health problems, and mental health evaluations of their descendants.
That would take awhile.
You really think what is happening is a plan under this administration?And as with every other plan under this administration, would undoubtedly be purposely corrupted to persecute those who are white, heterosexual, and male.
Isn’t the citizenry already oppressed. It seems to me our whole society is oppressed, even the career politicians.You ignore the all too possible plausibility of your government oppressing its citizenry, even to the point of death.
Difficult times for everyone.I point you to the oh so recent Covid protocol as fuel in that fire. We're getting hotter.
So you're for government mandates?Make it mandatory for everyone to be strapped. Problem solved, you're welcome.
Is there a reason you are in favor of trying to suppress the rights given to man by God?Yes.