you don't suppor fisa but you're supporting fisa
Is there no room in your head for nuance?
There are a number of things I don't personally support that I 'go along' with.
I don't support FISA, and most likely will never have to 'go along' with whatever being on the wrong end of FISA entails.
I'm not sure I'm on record as supporting FISA; if you got that impression, you're mistaken, otherwise point to me where I implied that, implicitly or explicitly.
You're in a mood and that's fine, but here's my point, if Nunes is going to be a strong advocate for FISA on one day, and then on another day impugn the FISA process as broken and point to the ease at which it can be gamed, then that's called:
Duplicity, will-full obfuscation, smoke and mirrors, etc.
In other words you support secret government spying and the abuses that come with it as long as it targets your political enemies.
100% not what I posted, but if that works for you, I say go with it.
It's becoming clear you're not interested in discussion, and that's fine.
Happy Friday.
you spent most of the night here bashing anyone that questions the FISA court until you had your words from before fed back to you.
Now you're moon walking and wobbling all over the place.
don't tell me you're against secret government courts and spying show me.
I have fd 302s done on me .a 302 is a form fbi agents use to take notes on
Oh, he's working on Hillary actions now ?Correct he's not investigating garbage. He's investigating real corruption.
Daily mail lol.Let's see how it plays overseas.
Trump green lights the release of explosive Nunes memo | Daily Mail Online
friend.B.I.A.S.E.D: Memo reveals James Comey used dodgy 'golden showers' dossier to get Trump team surveillance warrant even though top officials KNEW it was paid for by Hillary and British spy who wrote it was desperate to keep him out of office
- President Donald Trump gave approval for the House Intelligence committee to release an explosive memo
- Intelligence panel Republicans drafted it and voted for its release
- Republicans claim it shows bias in the FBI at the onset of the Russia probe
- They focus on a FISA court order that got surveillance of Trump advisor Carter Page
- Trump: 'I think it's a disgrace, what's happening in our country'
- Memo charges ex-British intelligence officer Chris Steele with 'financial and ideological motivations' who 'desperate that Donald Trump not get elected'
- Says FBI Deputy Director McCabe testified no warrant would have been sought without the dossier
- Says funding of dossier by Hillary Clinton's campaign wasn't revealed in warrant applications even though top FBI and DoJ officials knew
Oh, he's working on Hillary actions now ?
As far as I know he hasn't mentioned the efficacy of the FISA process or court. The claims basically are that the FBI lied by commission and omission to obtain the warrants. I assume when future applications are made the judge will do his job, judges don't like to be lied to or embarrassed in any way.Let's start over.
How can Nunes decry the FISA court he just reauthorized with zeal by claiming that it's a flawed process?
The memo is a 'nothing burger' and yes, you are correct.Days leading up to the memo being released " people will die " was the talking point.
Now it's " a nothing burger " .
From the same people .
I love fish and phish!you don't suppor fisa but you're supporting fisa
Not over nothing. Over partisan half truths and misleading innuendo that has Hannity and his @floridays followers adding 1 and 1 and getting 33000 missing Clinton emails, 200 corrupt officials, 4 dead marines, and a partridge in a pear tree.The memo is a 'nothing burger' and yes, you are correct.
The Dims and the Repugs were making this out to be a big deal and it was "Wut?".
So much hype over nothing.
Let's start over.
How can Nunes decry the FISA court he just reauthorized with zeal by claiming that it's a flawed process?
Not over nothing. Over partisan half truths and misleading innuendo