No. Nunez won't let their half out.schumer and Pelosi?
No. Nunez won't let their half out.schumer and Pelosi?
Let's start over.
How can Nunes decry the FISA court he just reauthorized with zeal by claiming that it's a flawed process?
No. Nunez won't let their half out.
I'm not the one taking Nunez and Hannity as gospel truthyou live in a bubble.
It doesn't fit the Fox/Trump narrative. That's the problem.Basic timeline
George Papadopoulis acts all shady with Russians.
FBI opens counter-intelligence investigation.
During course of investigation they find Carter Page acting all shady with Russians and obtain FISA warrant.
FISA surveillance continues to turn up enough evidence for 4 renewals of the warrant, the last of which were all authorized by Republican appointees.
I don't see the problem.
I'm not the one taking Nunez and Hannity as gospel truth
He's not against FISA, he's against the abuse of it, which clearly spying on political opponents is. Was that so hard?Let's start over.
How can Nunes decry the FISA court he just reauthorized with zeal by claiming that it's a flawed process?
I remember it was the Republicans screaming about how this was the biggest foundation shaking exposure of government corruption since Watergate.I don't watch Hannity . I do watch interviews with our leaders. I'm still looking for the catastrophic release of classified sources that was coming with this memo release. perhaps you point it out to me since you say schumer and Pelosi are honest brokers of the truth.
Basic timeline
George Papadopoulis acts all shady with Russians.
FBI opens counter-intelligence investigation.
During course of investigation they find Carter Page acting all shady with Russians and obtain FISA warrant.
FISA surveillance continues to turn up enough evidence for 4 renewals of the warrant, the last of which were all authorized by Republican appointees.
I don't see the problem.
Nah, Democrats voting for a woman who disappeared 33,000 emails under subpoena was the biggest scandal since Watergate. Everything pretty much flows from that.I remember it was the Republicans screaming about how this was the biggest foundation shaking exposure of government corruption since Watergate.
Lol. No.
I remember it was the Republicans screaming about how this was the biggest foundation shaking exposure of government corruption since Watergate.
Lol. No.
Any charges against Hilary Clinton ?any charges against carter page? did the FBI present the dossier as opposition research to the FISA court when they presented it as evidence to support the spying of an American citizen.
I have no interest in Carter Page. I do have an interest in the unjustified spying of our government on an American citizen.
Well you would think he'd be pushing for readily available changes to ensure abuses wouldn't happen?He's not against FISA, he's against the abuse of it, which clearly spying on political opponents is. Was that so hard?
Any charges against Hilary Clinton ?
I remember them saying it sets a bad precedent that will make Security more difficult because their actions will now be used as political fodder.You don't remember Pelosi and Schumer citing the need to protect our security sources? Dance for your masters my friend.
That's a no.let you know when the inspector general completes his review.
I remember them saying it sets a bad precedent that will make Security more difficult because their actions will now be used as political fodder.
To make sure no one passing for white gets in silly. But seriously, who could've foreseen this kind of abuse? Kind of stunning that people have the gall of this magnitude, thinking they'd get away with it. And if Hillary had won they would have.Well you would think he'd be pushing for readily available changes to ensure abuses wouldn't happen?
And perhas the Donald should have been "extreme vetting" his campaign staff. I know. They're white. Why would you use "extreme vetting" on white people?
That's a no.