Massive FBI Scandal?

newfie

Well-Known Member
Let's start over.

How can Nunes decry the FISA court he just reauthorized with zeal by claiming that it's a flawed process?

lets start all over your turn - why would a yahoo media article generated by the dossier be used as supporting evidence to secure the FISA warrant.
 

It will be fine

Well-Known Member
Basic timeline

George Papadopoulis acts all shady with Russians.

FBI opens counter-intelligence investigation.

During course of investigation they find Carter Page acting all shady with Russians and obtain FISA warrant.

FISA surveillance continues to turn up enough evidence for 4 renewals of the warrant, the last of which were all authorized by Republican appointees.

I don't see the problem.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
Basic timeline

George Papadopoulis acts all shady with Russians.

FBI opens counter-intelligence investigation.

During course of investigation they find Carter Page acting all shady with Russians and obtain FISA warrant.

FISA surveillance continues to turn up enough evidence for 4 renewals of the warrant, the last of which were all authorized by Republican appointees.

I don't see the problem.
It doesn't fit the Fox/Trump narrative. That's the problem.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
I'm not the one taking Nunez and Hannity as gospel truth

I don't watch Hannity . I do watch interviews with our leaders. I'm still looking for the catastrophic release of classified sources that was coming with this memo release. perhaps you point it out to me since you say schumer and Pelosi are honest brokers of the truth.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
I don't watch Hannity . I do watch interviews with our leaders. I'm still looking for the catastrophic release of classified sources that was coming with this memo release. perhaps you point it out to me since you say schumer and Pelosi are honest brokers of the truth.
I remember it was the Republicans screaming about how this was the biggest foundation shaking exposure of government corruption since Watergate.

Lol. No.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Basic timeline

George Papadopoulis acts all shady with Russians.

FBI opens counter-intelligence investigation.

During course of investigation they find Carter Page acting all shady with Russians and obtain FISA warrant.

FISA surveillance continues to turn up enough evidence for 4 renewals of the warrant, the last of which were all authorized by Republican appointees.

I don't see the problem.

any charges against carter page? did the FBI present the dossier as opposition research to the FISA court when they presented it as evidence to support the spying of an American citizen.

I have no interest in Carter Page. I do have an interest in the unjustified spying of our government on an American citizen.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
I remember it was the Republicans screaming about how this was the biggest foundation shaking exposure of government corruption since Watergate.

Lol. No.
Nah, Democrats voting for a woman who disappeared 33,000 emails under subpoena was the biggest scandal since Watergate. Everything pretty much flows from that.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
I remember it was the Republicans screaming about how this was the biggest foundation shaking exposure of government corruption since Watergate.

Lol. No.

You don't remember Pelosi and Schumer citing the need to protect our security sources? Dance for your masters my friend.
 

Turdferguson

Just a turd
any charges against carter page? did the FBI present the dossier as opposition research to the FISA court when they presented it as evidence to support the spying of an American citizen.

I have no interest in Carter Page. I do have an interest in the unjustified spying of our government on an American citizen.
Any charges against Hilary Clinton ?
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
He's not against FISA, he's against the abuse of it, which clearly spying on political opponents is. Was that so hard?
Well you would think he'd be pushing for readily available changes to ensure abuses wouldn't happen?

And perhas the Donald should have been "extreme vetting" his campaign staff. I know. They're white. Why would you use "extreme vetting" on white people?
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
You don't remember Pelosi and Schumer citing the need to protect our security sources? Dance for your masters my friend.
I remember them saying it sets a bad precedent that will make Security more difficult because their actions will now be used as political fodder.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Well you would think he'd be pushing for readily available changes to ensure abuses wouldn't happen?

And perhas the Donald should have been "extreme vetting" his campaign staff. I know. They're white. Why would you use "extreme vetting" on white people?
To make sure no one passing for white gets in silly. But seriously, who could've foreseen this kind of abuse? Kind of stunning that people have the gall of this magnitude, thinking they'd get away with it. And if Hillary had won they would have.
 
Top