Maybe it's time to change our representatives?

[Neanderthal]

Is Taylor also guilty when RPCD’s start getting laid off on Monday?
Why wouldn’t they have the after 4 year language for the 22.4’s then?

The company can lay you off Monday now and work the cheaper guy Saturday

There is no evidence that they have done that anywhere

 

[Neanderthal]

I’m over 95 weekly. About $250ish a week.

I’m asking what your settlement was with the language that calls for a meeting with the district labor manager

You said it would be zero result

How do you know that if it’s not been done?

 

[Neanderthal]

This is the language we currently work under for 9.5 greivances and the 5 month will be extended to a calendar year in the proposed agreement

 

[wide load]

The company can lay you off Monday now and work the cheaper guy Saturday

There is no evidence that they have done that anywhere

Yet. New England supplement negotiated language that protects RPCD from such a layoff.

 

[wide load]

I’m asking what your settlement was with the language that calls for a meeting with the district labor manager

You said it would be zero result

How do you know that if it’s not been done?

They could change the work load now without a labor manager. They will not agree and it will be settled months after if at all.

 

[Neanderthal]

They could change the work load now without a labor manager. They will not agree and it will be settled months after if at all.

So you are saying the language that has not been used to your knowledge doesn’t work

But now the people that bargained this contract got a 12 month period instead of a five month opt in period to make it more possible.

Sounds like they were not asleep at the wheel, but more aware that half of the language that was supposed to fix the problem for guys that truely wanted a reduction of overtime —- not just a penalty pay check.

This is a positive step in making this language actually useful

 

[Neanderthal]

Yet. New England supplement negotiated language that protects RPCD from such a layoff.

May you find that language and post it here for me to read please

 

[Kamikaze]

Is Taylor also guilty when RPCD’s start getting laid off on Monday?
Why wouldn’t they have the after 4 year language for the 22.4’s then?

You should probably stop getting spitroasted by O’Brien and Zuckerman and learn to be a leader not sheep.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

You should probably stop getting spitroasted by O’Brien and Zuckerman and learn to be a leader not sheep.

The proposal is bad.
You can take your Union politics and shove it, most of us don't care about that crap.

 

[Kamikaze]

The proposal is bad.
You can take your Union politics and shove it, most of us don't care about that crap.

Lol you’re voting no cause the Boston Bully said so.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Lol you’re voting no cause the Boston Bully said so.

I have no idea who you're talking about bro.

I'm voting no because I read the proposal, and it's full of concessions.

 

[542thruNthru]

May you find that language and post it here for me to read please

He posted it a long time ago. Here it is though.

 

[542thruNthru]

I have no idea who you're talking about bro.

I'm voting no because I read the proposal, and it's full of concessions.

Half truth... you damn well know who is he talking about but I 100% agree your not voting because of him.

This guys is the new wanna be union forum bully.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Half truth... you damn well know who is he talking about but I 100% agree your not voting because of him.

This guys is the new wanna be union forum bully.

I honestly don't.
I see people post about it all the time and never cared enough to ask.

 

[Brownslave688]

The 22.4 guy is like the majority of the 1-4 year drivers now that don’t have 9.5 protections except on rare occasions of having bid routes etc

All of our 1-4 year guys without route are on the 9.5 list that want to be. There's plenty of loopholes for someone that knows what they're doing.

 

[542thruNthru]

I honestly don't.
I see people post about it all the time and never cared enough to ask.

My apologies then. I believe you, just thought your were being current events difficult.

 

[Kamikaze]

I have no idea who you're talking about bro.

I'm voting no because I read the proposal, and it's full of concessions.

Please do us a favor and list each concession article by article.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Please do us a favor and list each concession article by article.

22.4, and feeder and surepost subcontracting are the ones that matter to me. There are plenty of other things, which you're already aware of Tony.

 

[wide load]

You should probably stop getting spitroasted by O’Brien and Zuckerman and learn to be a leader not sheep.

For too long I was a Hoffa sheep, just like you are. #walkaway

 

[wide load]

So you are saying the language that has not been used to your knowledge doesn’t work

But now the people that bargained this contract got a 12 month period instead of a five month opt in period to make it more possible.

Sounds like they were not asleep at the wheel, but more aware that half of the language that was supposed to fix the problem for guys that truely wanted a reduction of overtime —- not just a penalty pay check.

This is a positive step in making this language actually useful

Not only will it not work, this language is not what the members asked for. Why isn’t the penalty pay automatic?