Mueller report
- Thread starter moreluck
- Start date
Indecisi0n
Well-Known Member
He's already working on the next collusion report . That's not going to be good for Trump!
El Correcto
god is dead
“The peoples will soon realize that Germany under National Socialism does not desire the enmity of other peoples. ... I want once again to be a prophet. If the international Finance-Jewry inside and outside of Europe should succeed in plunging the peoples of the earth once again into a world war, the result will be not the Bolshevization”
Reichstag Speech — United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
Colorized hitler speeches subtitled would be cool to see. Wish people weren’t so gung-ho over erasing history.
You always see the little angry man with the weird mustache yelling and getting cheers, you just assume he is going on about Jewish conspiracies but I want to watch his speeches and see what the German people were really cheering him for and see what exactly he said about Jews, the United States, Russia and Europe.
1989
Well-Known Member
They are only going to make 4.5 billion more than in 2018. They’ll be broke by Christmas.
newfie
Well-Known Member
just dont get too close when Kelly beats that wimps ass
BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
Mueller grand jury extended for up to 6 months
By Katelyn Polantz, CNN
Updated 6:28 PM ET, Fri January 4, 2019
Maybe because he wasn't finished.....
newfie
Well-Known Member
up too
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
Grand jury involved in Mueller probe working 'robustly'
“A grand jury convened to examine evidence collected by Robert Mueller's special counsel investigation is continuing to operate "robustly" despite the end of Mueller's investigation, according to prosecutor David Goodhand.”
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
Hopefully looking into the origins and involvement related to the Steele Dossier and the FISA court.
You know contrary to what you might believe I'm no fan of Rachel Maddow but she made an important point on her show tonight. The Starr Report on the Clinton investigation was released to the public unredacted less than 48 hours after it was presented to Congress and given that the Starr Report like the Mueller report was also looking for impeachable offenses as it's core objective public pressure for a full release of the Mueller report may serve to honk off enough people that it motivates Barr to do something soon. Stalling and or holding back information the public believes that it has a right to know may not sit well with swing voters in the key states needed for a Trump victory next year.
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
I don’t see how that is possible.
It is strictly illegal to release any grand jury information.
Clinton was different in that foreign and domestic forces were not engaged in a coup attempt that was investigated by government agents.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
It's not illegal if they get court approval. Ttku...
Why would a court order that grand jury information be left unredacted in a report?
El Correcto
god is dead
Because @MAKAVELI isn’t convinced the president of the United States isn’t a Russian Manchurian candidate.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
Grand juries in the United States - Wikipedia
SecrecyEdit
Grand jury proceedings are secret. No judge is present; the proceedings are led by a prosecutor;[15]and the defendant has no right to present his case or (in many instances) to be informed of the proceedings at all. While court reporters usually transcribe the proceedings, the records are sealed. The case for such secrecy was unanimously upheld by the Burger Court in Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 US 211 (1979).[16][17] The dissenting opinion was joined by Justices Burger and Stewart but concurred with the Court's opinion as to the importance and rationale of grand jury secrecy. Writing for the Court, Justice Powell found that "if preindictment proceedings were made public, many prospective witnesses would be hesitant to come forward voluntarily"; "witnesses who appeared before the grand jury would be less likely to testify fully and frankly"; and "there also would be the risk that those about to be indicted would flee, or would try to influence individual grand jurors". Further, "persons who are accused but exonerated by the grand jury [should] not be held up to public ridicule".[16]
United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 US 677 (1958), permitted the disclosure of grand jury transcripts under certain restrictions: "a private party seeking to obtain grand jury transcripts must demonstrate that 'without the transcript a defense would be greatly prejudiced or that without reference to it an injustice would be done'" and must make its requests "with particularity".[16] Further, First Amendment protections generally permit the witnesses summoned by a grand jury to discuss their testimony, although Dennis v. United States, 384 US855 (1966), found that such public discussion permits release of the transcripts of their actual testimony.[16]
The Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, requires the government to disclose to the defense any statements made by the accused to the grand jury, and, with respect to non-party witnesses, that after a witness has testified on direct examination at trial, any statement made to the grand jury by such witness be disclosed to the defense.
Cool copy/paste. But that doesn’t explain why a judge would allow for grand jury information to remain unredacted in a report. To expedite a report’s release is not a sufficient reason to do so.
