Mueller report

vantexan

Well-Known Member
LMFAO.

You're railing against a report you haven't read.

Yes, that meeting took place.

You don't know what you don't know.

Again, you look dumb.

Argument From Ignorance
No meeting took place where Trump campaign members, family or otherwise, asked the Russians to interfere in our election. That would be collusion, and don't have to read report to know Mueller said there was no collusion. Schmuck.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
LMFAO.

You're railing against a report you haven't read.

Yes, that meeting took place.

You don't know what you don't know.

Again, you look dumb.

Argument From Ignorance
No meeting took place where Trump campaign members, family or otherwise, asked the Russians to interfere in our election. That would be collusion, and don't have to read report to know Mueller said there was no collusion. Schmuck.
 

BrownArmy

Well-Known Member
No meeting took place where Trump campaign members, family or otherwise, asked the Russians to interfere in our election. That would be collusion, and don't have to read report to know Mueller said there was no collusion. Schmuck.

So, you don't have to read the report to know what's in the report.

Engage, Captain!
 

BrownArmy

Well-Known Member
No meeting took place where Trump campaign members, family or otherwise, asked the Russians to interfere in our election. That would be collusion, and don't have to read report to know Mueller said there was no collusion. Schmuck.

Wait, I thought Mueller was a demosocialcommunist operative ?

You discount him, yet you count on him, he's fake, oh wait, he's real...

You're a joke.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
So, you don't have to read the report to know what's in the report.

Engage, Captain!
No, I already knew that Trump's son met with a Russian woman who said she had dirt on Hillary but only wanted to talk about adopting Russian children. Said woman has been connected to FBI. Name the meeting where campaign members met with Russians and encouraged them to interfere in our election.
 

BrownArmy

Well-Known Member
No, I already knew that Trump's son met with a Russian woman who said she had dirt on Hillary but only wanted to talk about adopting Russian children. Said woman has been connected to FBI. Name the meeting where campaign members met with Russians and encouraged them to interfere in our election.

It's amusing watching you wrap your incorrect statements and ideas together like the plastic braids that kids make at camp.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Wait, I thought Mueller was a demosocialcommunist operative ?

You discount him, yet you count on him, he's fake, oh wait, he's real...

You're a joke.
Known fact that Mueller has said there's no evidence of collusion with Russians. Why wouldn't I point that out? Mueller can't outright lie without putting himself in jeopardy. But he can allude to, suggest, infer certain things that could lead one to believe there was obstruction. And that's essentially what his report does. Trump didn't actually obstruct the investigation but you're hanging your hat on there were times where Trump wanted to. Might have a case if there was an actual underlying crime but not only was there no collusion, no treason, but the whole thing was built on lies put forth by high level people in the DOJ, FBI, and CIA. You won't acknowledge that because you want Trump's head.
 
Last edited:

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
Known fact that Mueller has said there's no evidence of collusion with Russians. Why wouldn't I point that out. Mueller can't outright lie without putting himself in jeopardy. But he can allude to, suggest, infer certain things that could lead one to believe there was obstruction. And that's essentially what his report does. Trump didn't actually obstruct the investigation but you're hanging your hat on there were times where Trump wanted to. Might have a case if there was an actual underlying crime but not only was there no collusion, no treason, but the whole thing was built on lies put forth by high level people in the DOJ, FBI, and CIA. You won't acknowledge that because you want Trump's head.
Lol.
You're so desperate.
 

LarryBird

Well-Known Member
It's amusing watching you wrap your incorrect statements and ideas together like the plastic braids that kids make at camp.
He is the dumbest guy on this board, which is only magnified by the smug demeanor he takes on while defending Trump by any means necessary.

I actually enjoy the back and forth with some of the conservatives on this board, because differences aside, I can respect their intellect and the fact that they're engaged in the political process of our country. @vantexan and @newfie are two notable exceptions - two blathering idiots, who come off like the uninformed Breitbart disciples they are.

I actually dislike them. Not just disagree with them politically, but truly dislike them as people. They are among the worst kind in my opinion - fools stuck in their own sad world, which consists of closed minds and wide open mouths.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
He is the dumbest guy on this board, which is only magnified by the smug demeanor he takes on while defending Trump by any means necessary.

I actually enjoy the back and forth with some of the conservatives on this board, because differences aside, I can respect their intellect and the fact that they're engaged in the political process of our country. @vantexan and @newfie are two notable exceptions - two blathering idiots, who come off like the uninformed Breitbart disciples they are.

I actually dislike them. Not just disagree with them politically, but truly dislike them as people. They are among the worst kind in my opinion - fools stuck in their own sad world, which consists of closed minds and wide open mouths.
Yep, when they pull out the knives you know you're getting under their skin.
 

BrownArmy

Well-Known Member
Can't name that meeting, huh?

Look guy, I'm not going to hold your hand.

I posted Mueller's 'Executive Summaries'.

You won't read the report (it's online), and you won't even read the summaries.

I'm not sure what you're asking of me.

If you don't want to educate yourself, that's not on me.

You are literally telling me that you're disputing something that you haven't read.

OK.

What do you think I should do with that?

You're asking me to defend assertions that I'm recounting from something you haven't read.

I'm not sure how to help you.

Do you want me to re-post the link to the 'Executive Summaries'?

Do you want me to re-post the link to the entire Report?

Guy, at some point, sht or get off the pot.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Look guy, I'm not going to hold your hand.

I posted Mueller's 'Executive Summaries'.

You won't read the report (it's online), and you won't even read the summaries.

I'm not sure what you're asking of me.

If you don't want to educate yourself, that's not on me.

You are literally telling me that you're disputing something that you haven't read.

OK.

What do you think I should do with that?

You're asking me to defend assertions that I'm recounting from something you haven't read.

I'm not sure how to help you.

Do you want me to re-post the link to the 'Executive Summaries'?

Do you want me to re-post the link to the entire Report?

Guy, at some point, sht or get off the pot.
Can't name the meeting, huh? Come on, you said there was a meeting. If so Mueller claims there was collusion. Tell us when Trump campaign members asked Russians to interfere in our election.
 

BrownArmy

Well-Known Member
Can't name the meeting, huh? Come on, you said there was a meeting. If so Mueller claims there was collusion. Tell us when Trump campaign members asked Russians to interfere in our election.

Reading isn't your strong suit, I get it.

I understand why you're hesitant to read the Mueller Report.

It's dense. LOTS of words and sentences. Complex sentences that sometimes span several lines on a printed page...they're that long.

I get it, it's much easier for you to be spoon-fed easily digested news-bits right into your mouth, like a baby-bird.

.

Read the report, or stfu.
 
Top