Mueller report

[floridays]

Reading isn't your strong suit, I get it.

I understand why you're hesitant to read the Mueller Report.

It's dense. LOTS of words and sentences. Complex sentences that sometimes span several lines on a printed page...they're that long.

I get it, it's much easier for you to be spoon-fed easily digested news-bits right into your mouth, like a baby-bird.

.

Read the report, or stfu.

I read it, every word, even the footnotes.
Make your point.

 

[vantexan]

Reading isn't your strong suit, I get it.

I understand why you're hesitant to read the Mueller Report.

It's dense. LOTS of words and sentences. Complex sentences that sometimes span several lines on a printed page...they're that long.

I get it, it's much easier for you to be spoon-fed easily digested news-bits right into your mouth, like a baby-bird.

.

Read the report, or stfu.

Nope, you aren't getting off the hook. Mueller said there was no evidence of collusion. You said Trump campaign members met with Russians and asked them to interfere in the election. How can that possibly be if Mueller said there was no collusion? And yet you won't back it up by saying when, where, and who. Claim it's in the report that exonerated Trump of colluding. Sounds to me like you're talking out of your backside.

 

[BrownArmy]

Nope, you aren't getting off the hook. Mueller said there was no evidence of collusion. You said Trump campaign members met with Russians and asked them to interfere in the election. How can that possibly be if Mueller said there was no collusion? And yet you won't back it up by saying when, where, and who. Claim it's in the report that exonerated Trump of colluding. Sounds to me like you're talking out of your backside.

I know, right?

Read Mueller's report.

It's difficult for me to have a substantive discussion with you when you refuse to join the game.

Again, I'm not sure what you want from me...you're trying to FIGHT me about Mueller's report, but you haven't read it, sooooo.

Like I said, sht or get off the pot.

I'm not going to hold your hand through this, you need to step up like an adult and be responsible with your actions.

So far, your actions amount to 'nah-nah-nah', 'didn't read it', 'don't need to read it'.

OK.

If that's the case, you and I are done discussing Mueller.

If you want to read the Report, or even the Executive Summaries, get back to me.

Otherwise, please enjoy the cesspool of your willful ignorance.

 

[floridays]

Nope, you aren't getting off the hook. Mueller said there was no evidence of collusion. You said Trump campaign members met with Russians and asked them to interfere in the election. How can that possibly be if Mueller said there was no collusion? And yet you won't back it up by saying when, where, and who. Claim it's in the report that exonerated Trump of colluding. Sounds to me like you're talking out of your backside.

Lett'em simmer Tex, lett"em get good and warm, cause when the hammer falls on anything heated it's mashed, compressed and formed to exactly what the smith wants it to be.
My hope is the smith metes out justice with the hammering, equal at least to what brought us, the United States, to this point.
The left always calls for justice, even when the purported wrongdoing is an illusion, I say fillem up with all the justice they think they can handle and give em more.

My thought is their back must be broken, they must be destroyed, period. Not one prisoner, to save the Nation that is the requirement.

I'm passionate in my beliefs, and happy to be that way.
@newfie I respect and thank you for noting my passion, long ago.

Kick the Anti- US bastards ass now.

 

[vantexan]

I know, right?

Read Mueller's report.

It's difficult for me to have a substantive discussion with you when you refuse to join the game.

Again, I'm not sure what you want from me...you're trying to FIGHT me about Mueller's report, but you haven't read it, sooooo.

Like I said, sht or get off the pot.

I'm not going to hold your hand through this, you need to step up like an adult and be responsible with your actions.

So far, your actions amount to 'nah-nah-nah', 'didn't read it', 'don't need to read it'.

OK.

If that's the case, you and I are done discussing Mueller.

If you want to read the Report, or even the Executive Summaries, get back to me.

Otherwise, please enjoy the cesspool of your willful ignorance.

You're the one who claims there was a meeting but refuses to back it up. I'm not going to read a B.S. report. If Mueller says no collusion, but you say there was, someone is either very mistaken or lying. Which are you, and which is Mueller? It's like IWBF not knowing Strzok and Page were part of Mueller's team. In your zeal to nail Trump you want to believe the very worst and ignore the obvious. The only collusion was between people loyal to Clinton(Democrats) and "Never Trumpers"(Republicans) who liked the Swamp as is and tried to figure out a way to either defeat him or get rid of him if he won. And to paraphrase a certain minister: their chickens have come home to roost.

 

[BrownArmy]

You're the one who claims there was a meeting but refuses to back it up. I'm not going to read a B.S. report. If Mueller says no collusion, but you say there was, someone is either very mistaken or lying. Which are you, and which is Mueller? It's like IWBF not knowing Strzok and Page were part of Mueller's team. In your zeal to nail Trump you want to believe the very worst and ignore the obvious. The only collusion was between people loyal to Clinton(Democrats) and "Never Trumpers"(Republicans) who liked the Swamp as is and tried to figure out a way to either defeat him or get rid of him if he won. And to paraphrase a certain minister: their chickens have come home to roost.

Okay.

 

[bbsam]

It's because she got away with so much. And your side just yawns. No one will ever accuse Democrats of being the Law and Order party.

I don’t think republicans are in danger of being called the “Law and Order” party for
A good long time.

Not with a straight face at least.

 

[bbsam]

Smart guy is my term, . Keep playing your game, the chickens are working overtime for the egg on the face crowd. @bbsam @MAKAVELI

Last I checked, neither the word “smart”, nor the word “guy” have been trademarked.

Nor has the conjunction of the two been trademarked.

Carry on.

 

[bbsam]

Lett'em simmer Tex, lett"em get good and warm, cause when the hammer falls on anything heated it's mashed, compressed and formed to exactly what the smith wants it to be.
My hope is the smith metes out justice with the hammering, equal at least to what brought us, the United States, to this point.
The left always calls for justice, even when the purported wrongdoing is an illusion, I say fillem up with all the justice they think they can handle and give em more.

My thought is their back must be broken, they must be destroyed, period. Not one prisoner, to save the Nation that is the requirement.

I'm passionate in my beliefs, and happy to be that way.
@newfie I respect and thank you for noting my passion, long ago.

Kick the Anti- US bastards ass now.

You truly have gone off the deep end.

 

[floridays]

Last I checked, neither the word “smart”, nor the word “guy” have been trademarked.

Nor has the conjunction of the two been trademarked.

Carry on.

Understood smart guy, when I say it it just seems to piss certain people off. Kinda like when I got in a particular guys kitchen using the Socratic method, You got that Smart guy, or should I say Bozo,? @Sportello loves the clowns as well.

 

[bbsam]

Understood smart guy, when I say it it just seems to piss certain people off. Kinda like when I got in a particular guys kitchen using the Socratic method, You got that Smart guy, or should I say Bozo,? @Sportello loves the clowns as well.

Socratic method? Is that when you bend over and spread ‘em?

 

[floridays]

You truly have gone off the deep end.

Not at all, I've called it a coup for over a year, maybe a year and a half, it will be proven.
Second part, all that don't want to reside under the Constitution, the founding document of are country should either leave to fulfill their desires or be dismissed.
The only other acceptable choice is to amend the Constitution, provision is made within to do afford that.
Beyond that, I think your type may come up against strong resistance if you clowns @Sportello persist.
It is what it is, keep backing a quite guy into a corner and when he decides to come out you wont't like it, it won't be pretty.
Yeah, I'm off the deep end, I love my country as founded not what it's trying to be twisted and shaped into by the leftist progressives.
You side has a problem, one that if you keep pushing, in the end you can't deal with.
Just a word to the wise or to those who have ears let them hear.

 

[bbsam]

Not at all, I've called it a coup for over a year, maybe a year and a half, it will be proven.
Second part, all that don't want to reside under the Constitution, the founding document of are country should either leave to fulfill their desires or be dismissed.
The only other acceptable choice is to amend the Constitution, provision is made within to do afford that.
Beyond that, I think your type may come up against strong resistance if you clowns @Sportello persist.
It is what it is, keep backing a quite guy into a corner and when he decides to come out you wont't like it, it won't be pretty.
Yeah, I'm off the deep end, I love my country as founded not what it's trying to be twisted and shaped into by the leftist progressives.
You side has a problem, one that if you keep pushing, in the end you can't deal with.
Just a word to the wise or to those who have ears let them hear.

 

[floridays]

Socratic method? Is that when you bend over and spread ‘em?

I'm not queer, so that would be a no.
Greeks were fairly keen on young boys, I'm not Greek, but I do know how to ask a question to elicit an answer either voluntarily or by compulsion, volunteerism is all that exists here. Lucky for you, you'd like me less in another venue.

If your attempt was humor, the answer is once, my prostate was checked once. My preference was a young female Asian with slender fingers, didn't happen, it was my regular doc and I left my lost virtue and defilement in the examination room.

We all got to do it or not.

 

[floridays]

Ok, I wanted to joke on my response to the socratic method, we never joke so I didn't. I did try to offer some humor noting a slender asian, maybe I should have
offered a picture or short porn clip?

 

[bbsam]

Ok, I wanted to joke on my response to the socratic method, we never joke so I didn't. I did try to offer some humor noting a slender asian, maybe I should have
offered a picture or short porn clip?

Maybe a long porn clip.

Not too long. Maybe 12 minutes or so.

 

[It will be fine]

Known fact that Mueller has said there's no evidence of collusion with Russians.

“...collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law.”

 

[newfie]

He is the dumbest guy on this board, which is only magnified by the smug demeanor he takes on while defending Trump by any means necessary.

I actually enjoy the back and forth with some of the conservatives on this board, because differences aside, I can respect their intellect and the fact that they're engaged in the political process of our country. @vantexan and @newfie are two notable exceptions - two blathering idiots, who come off like the uninformed Breitbart disciples they are.

I actually dislike them. Not just disagree with them politically, but truly dislike them as people. They are among the worst kind in my opinion - fools stuck in their own sad world, which consists of closed minds and wide open mouths.

I enjoy taking you out of your snowflake comfort zone. thanks for the tears it made my day.

 

[vantexan]

“...collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law.”

You say potato, I say potahto. No conspiracy either.

 

[bbsam]

You say potato, I say potahto. No conspiracy either.

Why 'numerous links' between Trump campaign and Russia didn't add up to conspiracy