Mueller report

bacha29

Well-Known Member
There simply wasn't much Mueller could do but to simply put the onus back where it belongs and that's with Congress. His job is finished. What Congress does going forward is something it and it alone must decide. As we all know a sitting president cannot be indicted. But, he most definitely can be after he leaves office. And this is when the fun will begin. Can you imagine the firestorm if his successor is a Republican who pardons him? We're just in year two of what could be a decade long process. What we could end up with a another Nixon. As Gerald Ford pointed out by the time all the indictments, trials , sentences and appeals are heard Nixon would have likely have died before serving a day of his sentence.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
There simply wasn't much Mueller could do but to simply put the onus back where it belongs and that's with Congress. His job is finished. What Congress does going forward is something it and it alone must decide. As we all know a sitting president cannot be indicted. But, he most definitely can be after he leaves office. And this is when the fun will begin. Can you imagine the firestorm if his successor is a Republican who pardons him? We're just in year two of what could be a decade long process. What we could end up with a another Nixon. As Gerald Ford pointed out by the time all the indictments, trials , sentences and appeals are heard Nixon would have likely have died before serving a day of his sentence.
Looking forward to all the indictments about to come down for the people who put this sham together in an attempt to unseat the president. Trump ultimately won't be convicted of anything because the investigation was based on lies. There was no underlying crime. If Trump gets re-elected I wonder when the statute of limit runs out?
 

Staydryitsraining

Well-Known Member
Looking forward to all the indictments about to come down for the people who put this sham together in an attempt to unseat the president. Trump ultimately won't be convicted of anything because the investigation was based on lies. There was no underlying crime. If Trump gets re-elected I wonder when the statute of limit runs out?
5 years.
 

It will be fine

Well-Known Member
Looking forward to all the indictments about to come down for the people who put this sham together in an attempt to unseat the president. Trump ultimately won't be convicted of anything because the investigation was based on lies. There was no underlying crime. If Trump gets re-elected I wonder when the statute of limit runs out?
The underlying crime was Russian interference in the 2016 election. Why don’t you think that should have been investigated?
 

El Correcto

god is dead
Right wingers cry about the dossier because they’re scared of the word. They get easily confused by the pronunciation.
The right wingers have been more correct on this than the left wingers. The bias in the fbi’s investigation is glaring. Mueller’s lack of knowledge shows it was the Hillary donors doing the report and slapping his name on it.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
The underlying crime was Russian interference in the 2016 election. Why don’t you think that should have been investigated?
No, if you're investigating Trump, it's about crimes he may, or may not, have committed. You can't indict Trump on what the Russians did unless he colluded with them. No evidence he did. If you could you'd have to indict Obama. Russian interference happened under his watch, not Trump's.
 
Top