Non liberal
Well-Known Member
Keywords; “for now” that’s because UPS has been saying a deal will get done. Just the fact that he said “for now” pretty much means they will step in if an agreement can’t be reached. Dirty bastards! Scabs!!
Keywords; “for now” that’s because UPS has been saying a deal will get done. Just the fact that he said “for now” pretty much means they will step in if an agreement can’t be reached. Dirty bastards! Scabs!!
He exercised his presidential power to stop the strike. He didn’t have to. TF are you talking about?Tf are you talking about?
They will use the economy as an excuse to intervene. But not right awayKeywords; “for now” that’s because UPS has been saying a deal will get done. Just the fact that he said “for now” pretty much means they will step in if an agreement can’t be reached. Dirty bastards! Scabs!!
Signal
The rail strike?He exercised his presidential power to stop the strike. He didn’t have to. TF are you talking about?
The railway workers were covering under a different statute.He exercised his presidential power to stop the strike. He didn’t have to. TF are you talking about?
YesThe rail strike?
Biden signed the RLA in effect a month before the strike in order to deny the workers that right. Am I wrong in saying that? Because I’ve heard this before but don’t understand what you’re trying to say. Railworkers can strike normally right? Otherwise, what is the point of the union?The railway workers were covering under a different statute.
Did you actually read my post and what I responded to?
No, you’re right, but the teamsters at UPS are under the Taft/Hartley act. The president can intervene if it’s deemed harmful to the economy. Will he? Who knows with that imbecile.Biden signed the RLA in effect a month before the strike in order to deny the workers that right. Am I wrong in saying that? Because I’ve heard this before but don’t understand what you’re trying to say. Railworkers can strike normally right? Otherwise, what is the point of the union?
He doesn’t like you.Did you actually read my post and what I responded to?
Yup, guess I didn’t understand what u were saying though. The sentence was kind of a word salad. My bad if I misinterpreted.Did you actually read my post and what I responded to?
Yeah,Yup, guess I didn’t understand what u were saying though. The sentence was kind of a word salad. My bad if I misinterpreted.
Yes, really. Congress acts on the RLA. The president may act on the NLRA the under the Taft Hartley Act.
No, you’re right, but the teamsters at UPS are under the Taft/Hartley act. The president can intervene if it’s deemed harmful to the economy. Will he? Who knows with that imbecile.
Yes, Biden signed the Railway Labor Act into effect back in 1926.Biden signed the RLA in effect a month before the strike in order to deny the workers that right. Am I wrong in saying that? Because I’ve heard this before but don’t understand what you’re trying to say. Railworkers can strike normally right? Otherwise, what is the point of the union?
Then you go back or lose your job.But what could he possibly do? If he orders us back to work and we all refuse... then what
"Taking the easy way out". Some of your stories are pretty good...No it wasn't.
The members didn't participate in the strike vote. Or the contract vote.
There weren't any options left for the IBT.... as they followed the IBT Constitution.
Place the blame where it belongs.
It's all a game- she's letting him do this in return for a favor...I agree. This stuff should be posted on the app. We should not have to "surf" the web just to find status updates. Maybe there hasn't been any negotiations updates. Just Congressmen/women, joining the fight. And no real updates to post.
I don't know, I'm just a dumb truck driver.
Then you go back or lose your job.
Maybe. Would you give up a 42 an hr job if the government orders you back to work?Would be ALOT of quiet quitting and injuries going on