Palestinian-Israel Conflict (War?)

[rickyb]

And yet it’s still Israel.

no and thats why theres violence out there

its satanic. its not capitalist.

 

[tourists24]

no and thats why theres violence out there

its satanic. its not capitalist.

View attachment 468038

And will continue until Hamas is dead. So yeah, the violence will continue. You side with Hamas it’s not the way to peace.

 

[rickyb]

And will continue until Hamas is dead. So yeah, the violence will continue. You side with Hamas it’s not the way to peace.

i dont side with hamas. i side with truth - its the christian way.

stealing land is not a free market.

 

[tourists24]

i dont side with hamas. i side with truth - its the christian way.

stealing land is not a free market.

Your truth doesn’t make it true. You’re using the UN to make it your truth. Your truth is supporting Hamas in this case. It will only keep the war going

 

[rickyb]

Your truth doesn’t make it true. You’re using the UN to make it your truth. Your truth is supporting Hamas in this case

a free market would be israel paying for land or israelis paying for land and palestinians agreeing.

jesus would be disappointed by this violent theft.

 

[tourists24]

a free market would be israel paying for land or israelis paying for land and palestinians agreeing.

jesus would be disappointed by this violent theft.

This assumes that your truth is the truth. Many disagree with your truth so the war will continue.

 

[rickyb]

This assumes that your truth is the truth. Many disagree with your truth so the war will continue.

a decision has already been made

Israeli-occupied territories - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

its truly satanic

 

[tourists24]

a decision has already been made

View attachment 468045

Israeli-occupied territories - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

its truly satanic

You’ve said this before and still doesn’t make it more true. The UN isn’t the arbitrator of truth. You’re also the one inserting Jesus into this. What red letters does Jesus justify violence to solve these problems

 

[rickyb]

You’ve said this before and still doesn’t make it more true. The UN isn’t the arbitrator of truth. You’re also the one inserting Jesus into this. What red letters does Jesus justify violence to solve these problems

i believe the ICJ and the UN are arbitrators of truth. but i can check it out more

yes common sense would say jesus is against violent stealing of land, and killing 40,000 people and lying about it saying you are after hamas.

 

[rickyb]

the founder of comics journalism

 

[vantexan]

yes gaza is palestine

Is it an independent country?

 

[vantexan]

no under intl law they were allowed to attack on oct 7 but not civilians

But they attacked civilians. Brutally. Intentionally. And now they're paying for it.

 

[vantexan]

i dont support hte russian occupation of ukraine anymore than i support the israeli occupation of palestine

notice how our politicians are hypocrites about occupations

Do yoh have an occupation?

 

[oldngray]

Do yoh have an occupation?

Under a bridge somewhere?

 

[BrownFlush]

they dont occupy any territory last i heard

I was talking about what the idiots did on 10/7

Somebody forgot to tell the Palestinians that.

 

[Box Ox]

no under intl law they were allowed to attack on oct 7 but not civilians

But they attacked civilians. Brutally. Intentionally. And now they're paying for it.

Comrade Ricky says “but not civilians” to make his position sound reasonable. But he doesn’t think there are any Israeli civilians. So he disagrees that civilians were attacked.

 

[Thebrownblob]

Comrade Ricky says “but not civilians” to make his position sound reasonable. But he doesn’t think there are any Israeli civilians. So he disagrees that civilians were attacked.

Occasionally, he tries to add the comment that well they were “having fun too close to the border” so I guess they deserved to slaughtered.

 

[rickyb]

Comrade Ricky says “but not civilians” to make his position sound reasonable. But he doesn’t think there are any Israeli civilians. So he disagrees that civilians were attacked.

the position IS reasonable under intl law. why do you think people under occupation have no right to fight back?

 

[rickyb]

Occasionally, he tries to add the comment that well they were “having fun too close to the border” so I guess they deserved to slaughtered.

its not that htey deserved it, but its in bad taste to throw a rave near a concentration camp lol

 

[rickyb]

Do yoh have an occupation?

yea we occupy native american land