Please don't follow FedEx method

[Savage21]

Is there any poster here that actually delivers in NYC or LA like a real big city? I want to know how that works...

 

[BrownSnowFlake]

Is there any poster here that actually delivers in NYC or LA like a real big city? I want to know how that works...

The only posters on this board are from podunk nowhere towns with more cows than people. If they lived in a real city they’d be out taming some strange and not arguing on the Internet like a bunch of nerds.

(There is that one uphill gardener from San Francisco but he doesn’t count bc Californians aren’t people.)

 

[sailfish]

The only posters on this board are from podunk nowhere towns with more cows than people. If they lived in a real city they’d be out taming some strange and not arguing on the Internet like a bunch of nerds.

(There is that one uphill gardener from San Francisco but he doesn’t count bc Californians aren’t people.)

I'm actually more inclined to go out and do stuff because I'm in one of those podunk nowhere towns. If I was stuck in some city ran by goons shoulder to shoulder with people I don't want to see anyway I'd probably just stay on lockdown with two deadbolts and three door latches because it takes an hour to travel five miles.

 

[TSB]

Yes some individuals go by “They or Them” but I think that is a small percentage, I do not know anyone personally that wants me to refer to their person as “They or Them” so again I think you are wrong.

You say “when you get to know a person.” The problem seem to arise at times before someone gets to know a person. Just like why this whole conversation has started. It is because a poster on here called someone a pronoun that could be wrong so then they used the word “it” to describe the person and then you seemed to think something was wrong with calling an individual “it.”

I think this whole problem started because there are individuals that don’t want to be “uncomfortable“ being mislabeled. Maybe they need to “step out of their comfort zone.”

Then there's always Cousin Itt.

 

[rod]

I have no problem with people filming in public (if its for a decent reason) but some of these skumbuckets go out of their way to cause problems where there isn't any.

 

[UnionStrong]

I have no problem with people filming in public (if its for a decent reason) but some of these skumbuckets go out of their way to cause problems where there isn't any.

Ignore or wave.

 

[rod]

Ignore or wave.

Oh we don't have any of that kind of problem around here. I'm talking about some of those idiots on the Youtube videos I've seen. We don't have much of any problems around here.

 

[Savage21]

I have no problem with people filming in public (if its for a decent reason) but some of these skumbuckets go out of their way to cause problems where there isn't any.

There is a probelm. These officers are corrupt and don't know their own laws.

 

[KearsargeCoop]

There is a probelm. These officers are corrupt and don't know their own laws.

Possibly, but the honestly just seem plain stupid to me.

 

[JL 0513]

Heard IT'S voice. What year is this? My Lord. Would you say IT to her face?

!!!!Wokester alert!!!!!

 

[jimdandy3]

!!!!Wokester alert!!!!!

Typical emotional Republican response. BDS is strong with you.

 

[Ou812fu]

Good luck with that, videoing in public is perfectly legal. Like it or not.

Not if someone doesn't give consent.

 

[Ou812fu]

Good luck with that, videoing in public is perfectly legal. Like it or not.

If you tell them that you don't consent. There are plenty of options when they continue to record. The only problem with the ring door camera is. You are on someone personal property. You have no right to tell them not to record you. They have every right to tell you to stop doing things in their property.

 

[UnionStrong]

If you tell them that you don't consent. There are plenty of options when they continue to record. The only problem with the ring door camera is. You are on someone personal property. You have no right to tell them not to record you. They have every right to tell you to stop doing things in their property.

Your option in public is to walk away. Period. No consent is needed to film in public. Check the law.

 

[UnionStrong]

Not if someone doesn't give consent.

Wrong

 

[UnionStrong]

Not if someone doesn't give consent.

Did you give consent to all the cameras filming you as you walk past them on the street? Lol

 

[UnionStrong]

Not if someone doesn't give consent.

 

[Ou812fu]

Did you give consent to all the cameras filming you as you walk past them on the street? Lol

Did you call the people that control them and tell them that you do not consent? By not saying anything you allow them to do what they want.

 

[Ou812fu]

Wrong

Is it legal for someone to record me when I say I don’t consent?

Answer (1 of 5): If you are in a two-party consent state, that means that all sides of a conversation must be aware that recording is taking place. If you are in a one-party consent state, only one person in the conversation need be aware, and it can be the person recording. If it’s a one-party ...

www.quora.com

 

[Thebrownblob]

Is it legal for someone to record me when I say I don’t consent?

Answer (1 of 5): If you are in a two-party consent state, that means that all sides of a conversation must be aware that recording is taking place. If you are in a one-party consent state, only one person in the conversation need be aware, and it can be the person recording. If it’s a one-party ...

www.quora.com

Recording of a private conversation is not the same thing as recording video of people in public, where there is no reasonable, expectation of privacy.