DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Kill yourself you POSYour most intelligent post in weeks.
Proud of ya!
Kill yourself you POSYour most intelligent post in weeks.
Proud of ya!
"What does it matter now?!"something Hilary Clinton said to the union in a video message
“What difference does it make?”"What does it matter now?!"
Did I just log into twitter?Kill yourself you POS
Just a quick bit of math for all you strike no matter what cheer leaders.
In '97 UPS held about 80% of the small package market. Which means when we stopped moving packages, the infrastructure that had been moving 20% of the volume (UPS' competition) had to try and move that other 80% as well. They failed miserably.
Today that math is nearly reversed. UPS' market share is just North of 20%. So when you go on strike this time, it will be the infrastructure of the 80ish % trying to pick up that extra volume. Still a big task, but much more doable.
Likely, much more of the volume will move by other means than happened in 97. Which also means much more will not come back after the strike.
Do you do this on your own or does the machine pay you to post your drivel
They will have a harder time picking up the 20% then they did the 80%.
That should make you quite happy when they send you out on the PC to deliver because by your estimates the volume will be very little. The last time in 97, management seemed to have a lot of problems making commitments on deliveries. At least you won't have to put in for the 9.5 list with so little volume that you expect.Just a quick bit of math for all you strike no matter what cheer leaders.
In '97 UPS held about 80% of the small package market. Which means when we stopped moving packages, the infrastructure that had been moving 20% of the volume (UPS' competition) had to try and move that other 80% as well. They failed miserably.
Today that math is nearly reversed. UPS' market share is just North of 20%. So when you go on strike this time, it will be the infrastructure of the 80ish % trying to pick up that extra volume. Still a big task, but much more doable.
Likely, much more of the volume will move by other means than happened in 97. Which also means much more will not come back after the strike.
Work your numbers using actual volume numbers. Not distorted market share numbers.How do you figure that?
That should make you quite happy when they send you out on the PC to deliver because by your estimates the volume will be very little. The last time in 97, management seemed to have a lot of problems making commitments on deliveries. At least you won't have to put in for the 9.5 list with so little volume that you expect.
That infrastructure they have now is used to push their greater volume load. Again, you need to use volume numbers and market share numbers.Never said it would be a small amount of volume. I was pointing out that the infrastructure of our competitors is vastly larger now than it was back then, so their ability to handle the influx from our customers trying to switch to them will be much greater this time around.
That infrastructure they have now is used to push their greater volume load. Again, you need to use volume numbers and market share numbers.
On track cannot keep employees. Were I do 235 stops in 10 hours. On track does 75 in over 12 hours. Of the 12 post offices ive delivered to the last 5 year, they cannot handle the pkg volume they have now. Amazon and Uber would look good delivering 2-130lb trampling boxes.OK.
Fedex, according to their website does about 14 million pieces a day. Their peak day almost twice that. Lets say just 21 million for peak day. UPS does about 20M per day. So Fedex goes into peak mode in a strike, they can pick up roughly 7 million pieces a day. The post office does even more than UPS does in delivery, but they don't have the backbone network for huge amounts of packages, so lets only give them 4 million. That's still over half the UPS volume and that is only 2 competitors. It does not include the Lazerships, On-Track, Amazon Delivery, Uber delivery and all the rest that currently exist and will pop up to try and take the business in a strike.
I don't think they can get it all, at least not right away. But their ability to ramp up and take a large chunk of it is much greater than it was in 1997.
Just a quick bit of math for all you strike no matter what cheer leaders.
In '97 UPS held about 80% of the small package market. Which means when we stopped moving packages, the infrastructure that had been moving 20% of the volume (UPS' competition) had to try and move that other 80% as well. They failed miserably.
Today that math is nearly reversed. UPS' market share is just North of 20%. So when you go on strike this time, it will be the infrastructure of the 80ish % trying to pick up that extra volume. Still a big task, but much more doable.
Likely, much more of the volume will move by other means than happened in 97. Which also means much more will not come back after the strike.
On track cannot keep employees. Were I do 235 stops in 10 hours. On track does 75 in over 12 hours. Of the 12 post offices ive delivered to the last 5 year, they cannot handle the pkg volume they have now. Amazon and Uber would look good delivering 2-130lb trampling boxes.
Where will they get the extra work force? UPS could not hire during peak. I hear other did too.
Just a quick bit of math for all you strike no matter what cheer leaders.
In '97 UPS held about 80% of the small package market. Which means when we stopped moving packages, the infrastructure that had been moving 20% of the volume (UPS' competition) had to try and move that other 80% as well. They failed miserably.
Today that math is nearly reversed. UPS' market share is just North of 20%. So when you go on strike this time, it will be the infrastructure of the 80ish % trying to pick up that extra volume. Still a big task, but much more doable.
Likely, much more of the volume will move by other means than happened in 97. Which also means much more will not come back after the strike.