browniehound
Well-Known Member
I say do what they say and don't worry about making the driver happy. Its your ass not his that has to deal with your supervisor. I'm a driver and am happy when the packages are actually where they are supposed to be in the truck. I understand this is not always possible, but if its close that is good for me.
I'm not sure as a preloader that you know how much smoother the day goes when the truck is loaded stop for stop. I'm not sure UPS understands this. If UPS understood this they would give the preload more time to make the loads perfect instead of shoving the packages down your throat for 4 hours.
I truly believe I would be paid under everyday if my truck was loaded stop for stop, so why not give the preload the time to do this? So say I'm 15 minutes paid under instead of 15 minutes paid over. That would be a savings of $48.39/2=$24.24 in labor savings. Multiply that by 3 (the minimum # of cars the preloader does) and it comes to $72.63 is driver labor savings.
The preloader at $9.50/hour would have to work 7.6 more hours in one day over what he now does now to negate those savings gained from the driver. Why not give him an extra hour to really perfect the load? It will only cost you $9.50 and give you $63.13 in driver labor cost savings. You can do the math with 80,000 drivers and the 200+ working days/year. Yet you can't idle the truck or go over your ORION mileage by 1 or 2. That might waste 1/2 gallon of fuel or about $1.70. Its trivial compared to the 64 bucks they COULD be saving.
But, the preload is on a different cost account than the drivers so their managers don't care. How about the higher-ups? Don't you care? Can you get the big picture? Or is just about micro-managing to achieve certain numbers in each segment of the business only to hurt the entire business as a whole?
Yes, its a rhetorical question. We all know the answer. But why? How does the management committee allow this to continue?
So sorry that I went on this tangent. My intent was 1 paragraph at the start.
I'm not sure as a preloader that you know how much smoother the day goes when the truck is loaded stop for stop. I'm not sure UPS understands this. If UPS understood this they would give the preload more time to make the loads perfect instead of shoving the packages down your throat for 4 hours.
I truly believe I would be paid under everyday if my truck was loaded stop for stop, so why not give the preload the time to do this? So say I'm 15 minutes paid under instead of 15 minutes paid over. That would be a savings of $48.39/2=$24.24 in labor savings. Multiply that by 3 (the minimum # of cars the preloader does) and it comes to $72.63 is driver labor savings.
The preloader at $9.50/hour would have to work 7.6 more hours in one day over what he now does now to negate those savings gained from the driver. Why not give him an extra hour to really perfect the load? It will only cost you $9.50 and give you $63.13 in driver labor cost savings. You can do the math with 80,000 drivers and the 200+ working days/year. Yet you can't idle the truck or go over your ORION mileage by 1 or 2. That might waste 1/2 gallon of fuel or about $1.70. Its trivial compared to the 64 bucks they COULD be saving.
But, the preload is on a different cost account than the drivers so their managers don't care. How about the higher-ups? Don't you care? Can you get the big picture? Or is just about micro-managing to achieve certain numbers in each segment of the business only to hurt the entire business as a whole?
Yes, its a rhetorical question. We all know the answer. But why? How does the management committee allow this to continue?
So sorry that I went on this tangent. My intent was 1 paragraph at the start.